Petre Inspirescu — 023. Petre Inspirescu at TON 21 Dec 23 (Episode 3 - Virtus Intrinsic)
Indie House · 2h 22m · analysed 25 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com
Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Petre Inspirescu.
In short
023. Petre Inspirescu at TON 21 Dec 23 (Episode 3 - Virtus Intrinsic) by Petre Inspirescu scores 74/100 in the SOONOS analysis (solid). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (97/100) and the weakest is TECHNIQUE (55/100).
This is not just a DJ set; it is a curated sonic experience that bridges the gap between the concert hall and the club.
Key takeaways
What worked
- Unique sonic identity.
- Flawless technical execution.
- Deep emotional resonance.
What weakened the set
- Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 10:00, 14:00, 22:00, 28:00, 95:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
Timestamped insights
Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.
A masterclass in patience; the transition is almost imperceptible as the new string section emerges.
Seamlessly introduces vocal elements while maintaining the harmonic center of the previous track.
A masterclass in minimal mixing. The transition is felt through the shifting sub-harmonics and the introduction of the vocal layer.
Smooth transition into a more percussive-driven track. The groove remains locked throughout.
Perfectly executed handover where the incoming groove replaces the outgoing texture without a seam.
About this indie house set
023. Petre Inspirescu at TON 21 Dec 23 (Episode 3 - Virtus Intrinsic) is a indie house DJ set by Petre Inspirescu, running 2h 22m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 74/100 overall — solid.
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
This is not just a DJ set; it is a curated sonic experience that bridges the gap between the concert hall and the club.
How the score breaks down
SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 97/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 55/100.
Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.
Energy and structure
The energy curve was sampled at 33 points, moving between 20 and 78 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.
5 transitions were detected and scored individually.
Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 2165.7 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 87 ms.
How this score is built
Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.
Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.
Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.
Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.
Full SOONOS analysis
This is not just a DJ set; it is a curated sonic experience that bridges the gap between the concert hall and the club.
The 8 dimensions
Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.
Score breakdown
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
25%55
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
25%92
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
20%88
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
15%88
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
15%97
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
Energy arc
Transitions analysed (5)
Long harmonic blend of orchestral layers
A masterclass in patience; the transition is almost imperceptible as the new string section emerges.
EQ-balanced choral introduction
Seamlessly introduces vocal elements while maintaining the harmonic center of the previous track.
Long, textural EQ blend
A masterclass in minimal mixing. The transition is felt through the shifting sub-harmonics and the introduction of the vocal layer.
Percussive layering and EQ swap
Smooth transition into a more percussive-driven track. The groove remains locked throughout.
Long EQ blend with vocal layering
Perfectly executed handover where the incoming groove replaces the outgoing texture without a seam.
Technical subscores
91
EQ balance
95
Beat alignment
89
Energy control
94
Tempo stability
89
Loudness control
94
Musical coherence
96
Harmonic compatibility
93
Transition cleanliness
Measured (DSP)
87 ms
Beat-grid drift (median)
Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.
222 ms
Drift p95
Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.
8,527
Boundaries detected
Points where the audio changes track or section.
10
Hard cuts / h
Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.
49
Clipping events
Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.
879
Level jumps
Sudden volume steps between tracks.
Measurement confidence 97% · analysed on the full audio.
Recurring patterns
Long static loops (6×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 10:00, 14:00, 22:00, 28:00, 95:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What SOONOS heard
- Unique sonic identity.
- Flawless technical execution.
- Deep emotional resonance.
Timeline
- 0:00Cinematic Opening
- 10:30Choral Peak
- 14:20Cinematic Peak
- 19:45Groove Lock
- 25:15Vocal/Groove Synthesis
Curious how your own set scores?
Methodology and limitations
This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.
Read the full SOONOS methodology →Questions about this analysis
- What score does Petre Inspirescu's 023. Petre Inspirescu at TON 21 Dec 23 (Episode 3 - Virtus Intrinsic) get?
- 023. Petre Inspirescu at TON 21 Dec 23 (Episode 3 - Virtus Intrinsic) scores 74/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (solid), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
- How long is 023. Petre Inspirescu at TON 21 Dec 23 (Episode 3 - Virtus Intrinsic)?
- The analysed recording runs 2h 22m.
- Which part of the mix scores best?
- IDENTITY is the strongest category at 97/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 55/100.
- How is this score calculated?
- SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.
More Petre Inspirescu sets analysed
Similar indie house sets
- Bell Towers — H.A.N.D. MIX 078 - Bell Towers (Halloween Special)74
- Damian Lazarus — Damian Lazarus @ The Bunker Afterhours, Los Angeles - August 201074
- Trikk — BBC Essential Mix Trikk 29 June 202475
- DJ Koze — 2025-04-09 - Benji B - DJ Koze Album Mode + Ganavya In 3 Records73
- Bell Towers — In-Store 006 - BELL TOWERS73
- Bell Towers — B.P.T. Hi-NRG Radio 009: Bell Towers73
- Daniel Avery — Daniel Avery - NTS Radio (27th February 2018)73
- Daniel Avery — Daniel Avery - NTS Radio (2nd January 2018)73
Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.
Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.
Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research