Pawsa — PAWSA LIVE @ SPACE MIAMI 🇺🇸 SOLID GROOVES MMW 25.03.22
Tech House · 2h 01m · analysed 24 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com
Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Pawsa.
In short
PAWSA LIVE @ SPACE MIAMI 🇺🇸 SOLID GROOVES MMW 25.03.22 by Pawsa scores 85/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (94/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (81/100).
This DJ understands that the space between the beats is as important as the beats themselves.
Key takeaways
What worked
- Exceptional groove maintenance
- Professional EQ and level management
- Strategic use of vocal hooks
What weakened the set
- Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (21:00, 26:00, 30:00, 36:00, 41:00, 48:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What to try next
- Use more dramatic filter sweeps to build tension.
- Experiment with layering a third percussive element for short bursts.
- Introduce a track with a contrasting tonal center to create a narrative 'zap'.
- Introduce more dramatic filter sweeps to create artificial tension.
Timestamped insights
Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.
Masterful transition where the incoming bassline takes over without a ripple.
Smooth integration of a new vocal loop over the existing groove.
Transparent transition that maintains the rolling energy perfectly.
About this tech house set
PAWSA LIVE @ SPACE MIAMI 🇺🇸 SOLID GROOVES MMW 25.03.22 is a tech house DJ set by Pawsa, running 2h 01m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 85/100 overall — festival ready.
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
This DJ understands that the space between the beats is as important as the beats themselves.
How the score breaks down
SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 94/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 81/100.
Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.
Energy and structure
The energy curve was sampled at 39 points, moving between 75 and 92 on the SOONOS energy scale — a narrow dynamic range across the set.
5 transitions were detected and scored individually.
Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 426.0 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 19 ms.
How this score is built
Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.
Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.
Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.
Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.
Full SOONOS analysis
This DJ understands that the space between the beats is as important as the beats themselves.
The 8 dimensions
Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.
Score breakdown
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
25%87
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
25%89
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
20%83
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
15%81
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
15%94
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
Energy arc
Transitions analysed (5)
Perfect Blend
Surgical EQ Swap
Long EQ blend with low-end swap
Masterful transition where the incoming bassline takes over without a ripple.
Percussive layering and filter fade
Smooth integration of a new vocal loop over the existing groove.
Long EQ blend with low-end swap on phrase
Transparent transition that maintains the rolling energy perfectly.
Technical subscores
90
EQ balance
95
Beat alignment
90
Energy control
97
Tempo stability
89
Loudness control
92
Musical coherence
86
Harmonic compatibility
92
Transition cleanliness
Measured (DSP)
19 ms
Beat-grid drift (median)
Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.
218 ms
Drift p95
Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.
7,226
Boundaries detected
Points where the audio changes track or section.
73
Hard cuts / h
Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.
60
Clipping events
Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.
807
Level jumps
Sudden volume steps between tracks.
Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.
Recurring patterns
Long static loops (6×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (21:00, 26:00, 30:00, 36:00, 41:00, 48:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What SOONOS heard
- Exceptional groove maintenance
- Professional EQ and level management
- Strategic use of vocal hooks
Timeline
- 13:45Seamless Low-End Swap
- 19:15Vocal Hook Peak
- 30:00Vocal Peak
Coaching notes
- Use more dramatic filter sweeps to build tension.
- Experiment with layering a third percussive element for short bursts.
- Introduce a track with a contrasting tonal center to create a narrative 'zap'.
- Introduce more dramatic filter sweeps to create artificial tension.
- Experiment with a 'reset' moment using a long breakdown to refresh the ears.
- Layer in more unique FX or field recordings to further distinguish the signature sound.
Curious how your own set scores?
Methodology and limitations
This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.
Read the full SOONOS methodology →Questions about this analysis
- What score does Pawsa's PAWSA LIVE @ SPACE MIAMI 🇺🇸 SOLID GROOVES MMW 25.03.22 get?
- PAWSA LIVE @ SPACE MIAMI 🇺🇸 SOLID GROOVES MMW 25.03.22 scores 85/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
- How long is PAWSA LIVE @ SPACE MIAMI 🇺🇸 SOLID GROOVES MMW 25.03.22?
- The analysed recording runs 2h 01m.
- Which part of the mix scores best?
- IDENTITY is the strongest category at 94/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 81/100.
- How is this score calculated?
- SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.
More Pawsa sets analysed
Similar tech house sets
- Marco Carola — Marco Carola: live at Sound Nightclub - Los Angeles, February 24 201785
- Loco Dice — LOCO DICE PRESENTS USED+ABUSED RADIO SHOW #3 - DUBFIRE85
- Hot Since 82 — Hot Since 82 - Live From a Lagoon in Argentina85
- Ilario Alicante — Ilario Alicante | Awakenings Summer festival 202385
- Jamie Jones — Jamie Jones live at Time Warp Mannheim 201685
- Jamie Jones — Jamie Jones @ Time Warp Mannheim 2014 (05.04.2014)85
- Joseph Capriati — Joseph Capriati _ disco set @ Pikes _ Ibiza 03.09.2025 [Disco Disco night]85
- Loco Dice — LOCO DICE PRESENTS USED+ABUSED RADIO SHOW #5 - dOP (live)85
Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.
Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.
Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research