Patrick Topping — Patrick Topping Essential Mix 18/04/2015

    Tech House · 2h 00m · analysed 21 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    87/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    2h 00m
    Genre
    Tech House

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Patrick Topping.

    In short

    Patrick Topping Essential Mix 18/04/2015 by Patrick Topping scores 87/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (93/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (84/100).

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (28:30, 36:00, 41:30, 60:00, 65:45, 70:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Introduce more melodic elements to create emotional peaks.
    • Experiment with longer breakdowns to build more tension.
    • Use subtle FX (reverb/delay) to add depth to the percussive layers.
    • Use subtle high-pass filter sweeps during long blends to create more space.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 02:15Measured (DSP)90/100Listen at 02:15

      Seamless handover of low-end frequencies.

    • 04:30Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 04:30

      High-energy transition that maintains momentum.

    • 08:15Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 08:15

      Effective use of vocal samples to bridge tracks.

    • 13:22Measured (DSP)95/100Listen at 13:22

      Masterful handover of the low-end. The incoming track's hats are introduced so subtly they feel like part of the original arrangement.

    • 18:45Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 18:45

      Smooth transition using high-pass filtering to swap the basslines without any muddy overlap.

    • 22:15Measured (DSP)90/100Listen at 22:15

      High-impact transition that introduces a vocal element, shifting the energy from pure groove to a peak-time feel.

    • 26:42Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 26:42

      A textbook tech-house transition. The incoming kick is introduced subtly, and the swap at the phrase change is imperceptible.

    About this tech house set

    Patrick Topping Essential Mix 18/04/2015 is a tech house DJ set by Patrick Topping, running 2h 00m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 87/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 93/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 84/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 40 points, moving between 40 and 92 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    7 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 132.9 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 20 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%86
    Beat Alignmentmeasured82
    Transition Qualitymeasured87
    Phrase Accuracymeasured93
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured89
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured95
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured60

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%90
    Narrative ArcAI92
    ProgressionAI90
    Tension & ReleaseAI85
    Section AwarenessAI90
    Flow ContinuityAI94
    PayoffAI90

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%87
    Energy Curvemeasured83
    PacingAI91
    MomentumAI94
    Peak ManagementAI87
    Energy HandoffAI90
    Fatigue ControlAI71

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%84
    Unexpected MomentsAI81
    ContrastAI83
    Transition Varietymeasured93
    Selection RiskAI87
    FreshnessAI71
    Surprise ControlAI81

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%93
    Selection QualityAI92
    Identity ConsistencyAI97
    IntentionalityAI94
    ConfidenceAI94
    RestraintAI86
    SignatureAI91

    Energy arc

    24:00120:00

    Transitions analysed (7)

    02:15

    Long EQ blend

    Seamless handover of low-end frequencies.

    90
    04:30

    Phrase-aligned cut

    High-energy transition that maintains momentum.

    88
    08:15

    Layered blend

    Effective use of vocal samples to bridge tracks.

    85
    13:22

    Long EQ blend with percussive layering

    Masterful handover of the low-end. The incoming track's hats are introduced so subtly they feel like part of the original arrangement.

    95
    18:45

    Filter-assisted blend

    Smooth transition using high-pass filtering to swap the basslines without any muddy overlap.

    92
    22:15

    Drop swap on phrase

    High-impact transition that introduces a vocal element, shifting the energy from pure groove to a peak-time feel.

    90
    26:42

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    A textbook tech-house transition. The incoming kick is introduced subtly, and the swap at the phrase change is imperceptible.

    92

    Technical subscores

    89

    EQ balance

    94

    Beat alignment

    89

    Energy control

    95

    Tempo stability

    88

    Loudness control

    91

    Musical coherence

    87

    Harmonic compatibility

    90

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    20 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    39 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    7,182

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    53

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    171

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    266

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (28:30, 36:00, 41:30, 60:00, 65:45, 70:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 00:45Cinematic Intro
    • 08:15Detroit Vocal Entry
    • 22:15Risky pressure or vibe dip
    • 28:12Percussive Peak

    Coaching notes

    • Introduce more melodic elements to create emotional peaks.
    • Experiment with longer breakdowns to build more tension.
    • Use subtle FX (reverb/delay) to add depth to the percussive layers.
    • Use subtle high-pass filter sweeps during long blends to create more space.
    • Experiment with a 'dry' vs 'wet' contrast in percussion to add depth.
    • Maintain the current phrasing logic as it is a core strength.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Patrick Topping's Patrick Topping Essential Mix 18/04/2015 get?
    Patrick Topping Essential Mix 18/04/2015 scores 87/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Patrick Topping Essential Mix 18/04/2015?
    The analysed recording runs 2h 00m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 93/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 84/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Patrick Topping sets analysed

    Similar tech house sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Patrick Topping analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Loading…