Oscar Mulero — OSCAR MULERO . ELECTROSONIC 2009
Detroit Techno · 2h 20m · analysed 24 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com
Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Oscar Mulero.
In short
OSCAR MULERO . ELECTROSONIC 2009 by Oscar Mulero scores 88/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (96/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (85/100).
This is how you build a set: not with drops, but with the relentless accumulation of rhythmic detail.
Key takeaways
What worked
- Surgical EQ precision
- Relentless hypnotic drive
- Impeccable phrasing
What weakened the set
- Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 6:00, 14:00, 27:30, 33:00, 64:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What to try next
- Maintain the current level of restraint in EQ blending.
- Experiment with very brief, filtered breakdowns to reset the floor's ears.
- Ensure sub-bass frequencies are monitored for potential phase cancellation during long blends.
Timestamped insights
Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.
A masterfully executed blend where the incoming track's percussion slowly replaces the outgoing elements.
Clean handover of the sub-frequencies, maintaining the driving momentum without a dip.
Perfectly executed transition where the new kick takes over without any volume dip or phase clash.
Smooth integration of a new rhythmic element that builds the energy floor.
Outgoing track's highs are slowly filtered out as the new track's atmosphere takes over.
Strategic disruption
About this detroit techno set
OSCAR MULERO . ELECTROSONIC 2009 is a detroit techno DJ set by Oscar Mulero, running 2h 20m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 88/100 overall — festival ready.
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
This is how you build a set: not with drops, but with the relentless accumulation of rhythmic detail.
How the score breaks down
SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 96/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 85/100.
Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.
Energy and structure
The energy curve was sampled at 48 points, moving between 60 and 96 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.
8 transitions were detected and scored individually.
Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 383.0 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 19 ms.
How this score is built
Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.
Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.
Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.
Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.
Full SOONOS analysis
This is how you build a set: not with drops, but with the relentless accumulation of rhythmic detail.
The 8 dimensions
Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.
Score breakdown
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
25%88
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
25%93
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
20%87
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
15%85
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
15%96
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
Energy arc
Transitions analysed (8)
Long-form EQ blend (64 bars)
A masterfully executed blend where the incoming track's percussion slowly replaces the outgoing elements.
Low-end swap on phrase
Clean handover of the sub-frequencies, maintaining the driving momentum without a dip.
Long EQ blend, low-end handover
Perfectly executed transition where the new kick takes over without any volume dip or phase clash.
Layered percussive blend
Smooth integration of a new rhythmic element that builds the energy floor.
Subtractive EQ blend
Outgoing track's highs are slowly filtered out as the new track's atmosphere takes over.
Perfect Blend
Minor EQ Overlap
strategic_disruption
Seamless Layering
Technical subscores
89
EQ balance
92
Beat alignment
93
Energy control
93
Tempo stability
89
Loudness control
93
Musical coherence
84
Harmonic compatibility
89
Transition cleanliness
Measured (DSP)
19 ms
Beat-grid drift (median)
Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.
140 ms
Drift p95
Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.
8,375
Boundaries detected
Points where the audio changes track or section.
42
Hard cuts / h
Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.
94
Clipping events
Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.
220
Level jumps
Sudden volume steps between tracks.
Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.
Recurring patterns
Long static loops (6×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 6:00, 14:00, 27:30, 33:00, 64:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What SOONOS heard
- Surgical EQ precision
- Relentless hypnotic drive
- Impeccable phrasing
Timeline
- 04:30Percussive Shift
- 09:15Tension Peak
- 15:45Groove Lock
- 19:30Peak Tension
Coaching notes
- Maintain the current level of restraint in EQ blending.
- Experiment with very brief, filtered breakdowns to reset the floor's ears.
- Ensure sub-bass frequencies are monitored for potential phase cancellation during long blends.
Curious how your own set scores?
Methodology and limitations
This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.
Read the full SOONOS methodology →Questions about this analysis
- What score does Oscar Mulero's OSCAR MULERO . ELECTROSONIC 2009 get?
- OSCAR MULERO . ELECTROSONIC 2009 scores 88/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
- How long is OSCAR MULERO . ELECTROSONIC 2009?
- The analysed recording runs 2h 20m.
- Which part of the mix scores best?
- IDENTITY is the strongest category at 96/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 85/100.
- How is this score calculated?
- SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.
More Oscar Mulero sets analysed
Similar detroit techno sets
- Jeff Mills — Jeff Mills: Sala Razzmatazz, Barcelona (05/02/2004)88
- Luke Slater — Luke Slater @ Essential Mix88
- Marcel Dettmann — Marcel Dettmann - BBC Essential Mix88
- Luke Slater — Luke Slater - Essential Mix 2019-11-1688
- Luke Slater — Berghain Fünfzehn | Luke Slater88
- Luke Slater — Luke Slater @ Rockit Festival, Utrecht - NL, 31 July 201087
- Luke Slater — Luke Slater's 2023 Merry Xmas Mix87
- Ben Klock — Ben Klock - Boiler Room - Dekmantel Festival 201689
Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.
Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.
Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research