Oscar Mulero — Oscar Mulero at Reaktor 2019

    Detroit Techno · 1h 52m · analysed 24 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    90/100
    Level
    reference level
    Duration
    1h 52m
    Genre
    Detroit Techno

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Oscar Mulero.

    In short

    Oscar Mulero at Reaktor 2019 by Oscar Mulero scores 90/100 in the SOONOS analysis (reference level). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (97/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (88/100).

    The DJ doesn't just play tracks; they sculpt a continuous rhythmic environment.

    Key takeaways

    What worked

    • Exceptional groove continuity
    • Surgical EQ management
    • Patience in narrative development

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (7:30, 33:00, 43:00, 45:00, 54:00, 56:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Continue to leverage long, surgical blends to maintain the hypnotic state.
    • Experiment with very brief, high-pass filter 'cuts' to create momentary rhythmic tension.
    • Ensure the mid-range remains clear during the densest layering periods.
    • Maintain the current level of technical precision; it is elite.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 3:45Measured (DSP)95/100Listen at 3:45

      Perfectly executed handover; the groove never wavers.

    • 7:20Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 7:20

      Smooth introduction of new rhythmic elements via filtering.

    • 11:45Measured (DSP)94/100Listen at 11:45

      Incoming track's sub-bass is introduced so gradually it feels like an evolution of the first track.

    • 15:45Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 15:45

      A slight clutter in the 500Hz-1kHz range for about 8 bars as the new percussive lead enters.

    • 19:40Measured (DSP)96/100Listen at 19:40

      Masterful layering where the two tracks become a new third entity. Perfect phase alignment.

    About this detroit techno set

    Oscar Mulero at Reaktor 2019 is a detroit techno DJ set by Oscar Mulero, running 1h 52m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 90/100 overall — reference level.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    The DJ doesn't just play tracks; they sculpt a continuous rhythmic environment.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 97/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 88/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 57 points, moving between 65 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.

    7 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 759.8 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 11 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The DJ doesn't just play tracks; they sculpt a continuous rhythmic environment.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%92
    Beat Alignmentmeasured92
    Transition Qualitymeasured89
    Phrase Accuracymeasured95
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured91
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured97
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%93
    Narrative ArcAI95
    ProgressionAI93
    Tension & ReleaseAI90
    Section AwarenessAI93
    Flow ContinuityAI97
    PayoffAI89

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%90
    Energy Curvemeasured84
    PacingAI96
    MomentumAI95
    Peak ManagementAI91
    Energy HandoffAI92
    Fatigue ControlAI74

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%88
    Unexpected MomentsAI85
    ContrastAI86
    Transition Varietymeasured96
    Selection RiskAI92
    FreshnessAI76
    Surprise ControlAI85

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%97
    Selection QualityAI95
    Identity ConsistencyAI99
    IntentionalityAI98
    ConfidenceAI97
    RestraintAI94
    SignatureAI98

    Energy arc

    0:00111:35

    Transitions analysed (7)

    3:45

    Long EQ blend with sub-bass swap

    Perfectly executed handover; the groove never wavers.

    95
    7:20

    High-pass filter transition

    Smooth introduction of new rhythmic elements via filtering.

    92
    11:45

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Incoming track's sub-bass is introduced so gradually it feels like an evolution of the first track.

    94
    15:45

    Mid-range layering

    A slight clutter in the 500Hz-1kHz range for about 8 bars as the new percussive lead enters.

    82
    19:40

    3-minute surgical blend

    Masterful layering where the two tracks become a new third entity. Perfect phase alignment.

    96
    22:45

    Perfect Percussive Blend

    100
    28:00

    Seamless Tonal Handover

    100

    Technical subscores

    91

    EQ balance

    95

    Beat alignment

    93

    Energy control

    97

    Tempo stability

    92

    Loudness control

    95

    Musical coherence

    87

    Harmonic compatibility

    92

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    11 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    121 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    6,677

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    45

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    25

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    272

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (7:30, 33:00, 43:00, 45:00, 54:00, 56:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What SOONOS heard

    • Exceptional groove continuity
    • Surgical EQ management
    • Patience in narrative development

    Timeline

    • 5:50Tension Peak
    • 10:15Rhythmic Complexity
    • 13:20Texture Shift
    • 17:45Groove Lock Peak
    • 15:45Risky pressure or vibe dip

    Coaching notes

    • Continue to leverage long, surgical blends to maintain the hypnotic state.
    • Experiment with very brief, high-pass filter 'cuts' to create momentary rhythmic tension.
    • Ensure the mid-range remains clear during the densest layering periods.
    • Maintain the current level of technical precision; it is elite.
    • Consider a brief 'reset' moment to enhance the impact of the next peak.
    • Explore even more aggressive mid-range filtering to create movement.
    • Experiment with brief melodic contrasts to provide human relief.
    • Monitor the 2-4kHz range for potential harshness during dense layering.
    • Utilize more dramatic filter sweeps to create moments of release.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Oscar Mulero's Oscar Mulero at Reaktor 2019 get?
    Oscar Mulero at Reaktor 2019 scores 90/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (reference level), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Oscar Mulero at Reaktor 2019?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 52m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 97/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 88/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Oscar Mulero sets analysed

    Similar detroit techno sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Oscar Mulero analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.