Onur Ozer — Onur Özer @ The Mix 2006

    Indie House · 2h 16m · analysed 24 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    85/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    2h 16m
    Genre
    Indie House

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Onur Ozer.

    In short

    Onur Özer @ The Mix 2006 by Onur Ozer scores 85/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (94/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (83/100).

    This is a textbook example of how to maintain a dancefloor's attention through micro-evolution rather than macro-explosions.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (8:00, 25:00, 45:00, 50:00, 62:00, 68:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Maintain the current level of EQ precision.
    • Experiment with slightly more dynamic filter sweeps.
    • Ensure the sub-bass remains consistent across track changes.
    • Continue to master the art of the long blend; it is your greatest strength.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 05:12Measured (DSP)94/100Listen at 05:12

      A textbook minimal transition. The incoming bassline is introduced so subtly it feels like a modulation of the first track.

    • 12:10Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 12:10

      Invisible transition; the new track emerges naturally from the textures of the first.

    • 17:25Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 17:25

      Smooth integration of new rhythmic elements over the existing groove.

    • 24:12Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 24:12

      A masterfully executed transition that maintains the hypnotic flow. The low-end swap is perfectly timed with the phrase.

    About this indie house set

    Onur Özer @ The Mix 2006 is a indie house DJ set by Onur Ozer, running 2h 16m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 85/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    This is a textbook example of how to maintain a dancefloor's attention through micro-evolution rather than macro-explosions.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 94/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 83/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 60 points, moving between 20 and 88 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    4 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 484.2 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 21 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    This is a textbook example of how to maintain a dancefloor's attention through micro-evolution rather than macro-explosions.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%85
    Beat Alignmentmeasured81
    Transition Qualitymeasured82
    Phrase Accuracymeasured92
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured90
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured90
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured73

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%88
    Narrative ArcAI92
    ProgressionAI88
    Tension & ReleaseAI84
    Section AwarenessAI89
    Flow ContinuityAI94
    PayoffAI80

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%86
    Energy Curvemeasured79
    PacingAI93
    MomentumAI91
    Peak ManagementAI85
    Energy HandoffAI86
    Fatigue ControlAI78

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%83
    Unexpected MomentsAI80
    ContrastAI83
    Transition Varietymeasured93
    Selection RiskAI85
    FreshnessAI72
    Surprise ControlAI80

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%94
    Selection QualityAI91
    Identity ConsistencyAI97
    IntentionalityAI94
    ConfidenceAI92
    RestraintAI96
    SignatureAI93

    Energy arc

    00:00136:00

    Transitions analysed (4)

    05:12

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    A textbook minimal transition. The incoming bassline is introduced so subtly it feels like a modulation of the first track.

    94
    12:10

    Long EQ blend

    Invisible transition; the new track emerges naturally from the textures of the first.

    92
    17:25

    Percussive layering

    Smooth integration of new rhythmic elements over the existing groove.

    88
    24:12

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    A masterfully executed transition that maintains the hypnotic flow. The low-end swap is perfectly timed with the phrase.

    92

    Technical subscores

    90

    EQ balance

    92

    Beat alignment

    87

    Energy control

    90

    Tempo stability

    87

    Loudness control

    92

    Musical coherence

    88

    Harmonic compatibility

    91

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    21 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    223 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    8,150

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    40

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    95

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    444

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (8:00, 25:00, 45:00, 50:00, 62:00, 68:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 00:45Atmospheric Foundation
    • 09:45Tension Peak
    • 14:30Groove Lock
    • 21:45Subtle Energy Shift
    • 26:30Groove Lock

    Coaching notes

    • Maintain the current level of EQ precision.
    • Experiment with slightly more dynamic filter sweeps.
    • Ensure the sub-bass remains consistent across track changes.
    • Continue to master the art of the long blend; it is your greatest strength.
    • Experiment with subtle rhythmic disruptions to add a layer of surprise.
    • Maintain the high level of EQ precision shown in this segment.
    • Continue to explore the boundaries of long-form minimal mixing.
    • Experiment with subtle field recordings to add more organic depth.
    • Maintain the high level of EQ precision shown here.
    • Experiment with slightly more aggressive filter sweeps to add a layer of 'live' performance energy.
    • Consider introducing a very sparse vocal or melodic element in the final 5 minutes to provide a narrative resolution.
    • Maintain the current level of EQ precision; it is what elevates this set to a professional level.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Onur Ozer's Onur Özer @ The Mix 2006 get?
    Onur Özer @ The Mix 2006 scores 85/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Onur Özer @ The Mix 2006?
    The analysed recording runs 2h 16m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 94/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 83/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Onur Ozer sets analysed

    Similar indie house sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Onur Ozer analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.