Nina Kraviz — @ Ultra Europe 2022

    Experimental Techno · 1h 54m · analysed 18 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    80/100
    Level
    club ready
    Duration
    1h 54m
    Genre
    Experimental Techno

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Nina Kraviz.

    In short

    @ Ultra Europe 2022 by Nina Kraviz scores 80/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is STORYTELLING (89/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (79/100).

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (34:00, 38:00, 42:00, 58:30, 66:00, 104:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Maintain the current technical precision.
    • Introduce a 'reset' moment to manage crowd fatigue.
    • Experiment with more creative transition techniques to build a unique signature.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 5:22Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 5:22

      Seamless integration of the incoming track's percussion over the outgoing groove.

    • 9:40Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 9:40

      Clean handover of the low-end frequencies, maintaining the drive.

    • 21:20Measured (DSP)100/100Listen at 21:20

      Intentional reset

    • 28:05Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 28:05

      Strategic disruption

    About this experimental techno set

    @ Ultra Europe 2022 is a experimental techno DJ set by Nina Kraviz, running 1h 54m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 80/100 overall — club ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is STORYTELLING at 89/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 79/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 27 points, moving between 70 and 98 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.

    7 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 652.5 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 19 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%81
    Beat Alignmentmeasured83
    Transition Qualitymeasured62
    Phrase Accuracymeasured91
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured85
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured95
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured66

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%89
    Narrative ArcAI89
    ProgressionAI89
    Tension & ReleaseAI88
    Section AwarenessAI86
    Flow ContinuityAI89
    PayoffAI93

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%85
    Energy Curvemeasured82
    PacingAI85
    MomentumAI93
    Peak ManagementAI90
    Energy HandoffAI90
    Fatigue ControlAI64

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%79
    Unexpected MomentsAI77
    ContrastAI77
    Transition Varietymeasured91
    Selection RiskAI81
    FreshnessAI63
    Surprise ControlAI77

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%87
    Selection QualityAI85
    Identity ConsistencyAI96
    IntentionalityAI90
    ConfidenceAI92
    RestraintAI71
    SignatureAI82

    Energy arc

    0:00113:53

    Transitions analysed (7)

    5:22

    Long EQ blend with high-pass filtering

    Seamless integration of the incoming track's percussion over the outgoing groove.

    92
    9:40

    Bass swap on the phrase downbeat

    Clean handover of the low-end frequencies, maintaining the drive.

    88
    12:45

    Perfect Blend

    100
    17:00

    Minor EQ Overlap

    82
    21:20

    Clean Drop Swap

    intentional_reset

    100
    24:12

    Perfect Phrasing

    100
    28:05

    Minor Gain Jump

    strategic_disruption

    82

    Technical subscores

    85

    EQ balance

    93

    Beat alignment

    91

    Energy control

    95

    Tempo stability

    89

    Loudness control

    87

    Musical coherence

    84

    Harmonic compatibility

    88

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    19 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    200 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    6,815

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    125

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    25

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    407

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (34:00, 38:00, 42:00, 58:30, 66:00, 104:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 2:15Groove Lock
    • 7:45Tension Peak

    Coaching notes

    • Maintain the current technical precision.
    • Introduce a 'reset' moment to manage crowd fatigue.
    • Experiment with more creative transition techniques to build a unique signature.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Nina Kraviz's @ Ultra Europe 2022 get?
    @ Ultra Europe 2022 scores 80/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is @ Ultra Europe 2022?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 54m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    STORYTELLING is the strongest category at 89/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 79/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Nina Kraviz sets analysed

    Similar experimental techno sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Nina Kraviz analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.