Nicolas Lutz — 027 - Nicolas Lutz - Recorded live from fabric

    Indie House · 2h 01m · Fabric London · analysed 24 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    77/100
    Level
    solid
    Duration
    2h 01m
    Genre
    Indie House

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Nicolas Lutz.

    In short

    027 - Nicolas Lutz - Recorded live from fabric by Nicolas Lutz scores 77/100 in the SOONOS analysis (solid). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (96/100) and the weakest is TECHNIQUE (82/100).

    This mix demonstrates that true energy comes from the relentless consistency of the groove rather than frequent drops.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (9:00, 26:00, 30:00, 34:00, 44:00, 60:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Continue to leverage long blends to maintain the hypnotic state.
    • Maintain the dark, underground aesthetic as it is highly effective.
    • Consider a very subtle melodic shift in the next segment to keep the narrative moving.
    • Continue to embrace the long, evolving blends that define this style.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 6:45Measured (DSP)95/100Listen at 6:45

      Expertly executed blend where the new bassline takes over without any phase issues.

    • 18:45Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 18:45

      Strategic disruption

    • 25:30Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 25:30

      Masterful patience; the tracks overlap for over 2 minutes without any frequency masking.

    About this indie house set

    027 - Nicolas Lutz - Recorded live from fabric is a indie house DJ set by Nicolas Lutz, running 2h 01m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 77/100 overall — solid.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    This mix demonstrates that true energy comes from the relentless consistency of the groove rather than frequent drops.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 96/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 82/100.

    The final score is capped by measured beatmatching: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 45 points, moving between 40 and 85 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    5 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 771.6 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 28 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    On this set, the ceiling applied is measured beatmatching.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    This mix demonstrates that true energy comes from the relentless consistency of the groove rather than frequent drops.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%82
    Beat Alignmentmeasured66
    Transition Qualitymeasured82
    Phrase Accuracymeasured93
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured86
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured89
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured79

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%91
    Narrative ArcAI94
    ProgressionAI91
    Tension & ReleaseAI88
    Section AwarenessAI92
    Flow ContinuityAI96
    PayoffAI85

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%86
    Energy Curvemeasured84
    PacingAI95
    MomentumAI93
    Peak ManagementAI88
    Energy HandoffAI89
    Fatigue ControlAI50

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%84
    Unexpected MomentsAI86
    ContrastAI86
    Transition Varietymeasured94
    Selection RiskAI89
    FreshnessAI50
    Surprise ControlAI86

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%96
    Selection QualityAI96
    Identity ConsistencyAI98
    IntentionalityAI96
    ConfidenceAI94
    RestraintAI96
    SignatureAI96

    Final score capped by measured beatmatching — the weighted average before the cap was 88.

    Energy arc

    0:00120:55

    Transitions analysed (5)

    6:45

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Expertly executed blend where the new bassline takes over without any phase issues.

    95
    14:30

    Perfect Blend

    100
    18:45

    Minor Drift

    strategic_disruption

    82
    23:10

    Seamless Swap

    100
    25:30

    Long EQ blend with phased low-end handover

    Masterful patience; the tracks overlap for over 2 minutes without any frequency masking.

    92

    Technical subscores

    86

    EQ balance

    88

    Beat alignment

    86

    Energy control

    89

    Tempo stability

    86

    Loudness control

    90

    Musical coherence

    88

    Harmonic compatibility

    86

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    28 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    219 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    7,237

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    11

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    140

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    245

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (9:00, 26:00, 30:00, 34:00, 44:00, 60:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 4:30Groove Lock
    • 10:15Texture Layering
    • 28:15Groove Lock

    Coaching notes

    • Continue to leverage long blends to maintain the hypnotic state.
    • Maintain the dark, underground aesthetic as it is highly effective.
    • Consider a very subtle melodic shift in the next segment to keep the narrative moving.
    • Continue to embrace the long, evolving blends that define this style.
    • Be mindful of sudden vibe shifts when transitioning between dense and sparse arrangements.
    • Maintain the excellent EQ separation during multi-track layering.
    • Continue to explore the intersection of breakbeats and hypnotic techno; it's a powerful narrative tool.
    • Maintain your exceptional patience in long-form blending; it sets you apart from the average DJ.
    • Consider incorporating more varied atmospheric textures in the final 10 minutes to deepen the emotional payoff.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Nicolas Lutz's 027 - Nicolas Lutz - Recorded live from fabric get?
    027 - Nicolas Lutz - Recorded live from fabric scores 77/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (solid), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is 027 - Nicolas Lutz - Recorded live from fabric?
    The analysed recording runs 2h 01m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 96/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 82/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Nicolas Lutz sets analysed

    Similar indie house sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Nicolas Lutz analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.