Moritz Hofbauer — NAX - Support for Ann Clue & Moritz Hofbauer | Live at Serum Chicago - 03.22.2024

    High Tech Minimal · 1h 53m · analysed 24 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    78/100
    Level
    club ready
    Duration
    1h 53m
    Genre
    High Tech Minimal

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Moritz Hofbauer.

    In short

    NAX - Support for Ann Clue & Moritz Hofbauer | Live at Serum Chicago - 03.22.2024 by Moritz Hofbauer scores 78/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (85/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (77/100).

    The DJ treats the transition not as a change of tracks, but as a change of state.

    Key takeaways

    What worked

    • Technical blend precision
    • Atmospheric consistency
    • Pacing and restraint
    • Harmonic mixing

    What weakened the set

    • Recurring mid-frequency clash (2×) — Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 2× (21:35, 30:12).
    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (8:00, 13:00, 31:00, 43:00, 46:30, 52:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Experiment with 3-deck layering to create unique rhythmic textures.
    • Use subtle delay or reverb sends on percussive elements to add spatial depth.
    • Introduce a melodic 'hook' track earlier in the set to create a more memorable emotional peak.
    • Experiment with more aggressive filter work during transitions.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 6:15Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 6:15

      Masterful long-form transition. The incoming track's percussion is introduced so subtly it feels like a single evolving piece.

    • 12:48Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 12:48

      Perfectly executed transition. The incoming kick replaces the outgoing one without any phase issues or volume dips.

    • 17:12Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 17:12

      Smooth integration of a new rhythmic element. The DJ waits for the phrase to resolve before fully committing to the swap.

    • 21:35Measured (DSP)78/100Listen at 21:35

      A slightly faster transition than the previous ones. A minor level jump is audible but doesn't break the groove.

    • 24:15Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 24:15

      Flawless execution of a standard melodic techno blend. The transition is almost imperceptible.

    • 30:12Measured (DSP)78/100Listen at 30:12

      Good use of high-pass filtering to bring in the new track's percussion without cluttering the mix.

    About this high tech minimal set

    NAX - Support for Ann Clue & Moritz Hofbauer | Live at Serum Chicago - 03.22.2024 is a high tech minimal DJ set by Moritz Hofbauer, running 1h 53m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 78/100 overall — club ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    The DJ treats the transition not as a change of tracks, but as a change of state.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 85/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 77/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 48 points, moving between 30 and 89 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 649.3 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 28 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The DJ treats the transition not as a change of tracks, but as a change of state.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%82
    Beat Alignmentmeasured68
    Transition Qualitymeasured79
    Phrase Accuracymeasured90
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured86
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured93
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured75

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%84
    Narrative ArcAI87
    ProgressionAI84
    Tension & ReleaseAI81
    Section AwarenessAI84
    Flow ContinuityAI88
    PayoffAI81

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%80
    Energy Curvemeasured77
    PacingAI82
    MomentumAI88
    Peak ManagementAI82
    Energy HandoffAI84
    Fatigue ControlAI63

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%77
    Unexpected MomentsAI76
    ContrastAI79
    Transition Varietymeasured87
    Selection RiskAI76
    FreshnessAI59
    Surprise ControlAI76

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%85
    Selection QualityAI83
    Identity ConsistencyAI93
    IntentionalityAI85
    ConfidenceAI85
    RestraintAI81
    SignatureAI77

    Energy arc

    0:00101:00

    Transitions analysed (6)

    6:15

    64-bar EQ blend, low-end swap on phrase

    Masterful long-form transition. The incoming track's percussion is introduced so subtly it feels like a single evolving piece.

    92
    12:48

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Perfectly executed transition. The incoming kick replaces the outgoing one without any phase issues or volume dips.

    92
    17:12

    Percussive layering

    Smooth integration of a new rhythmic element. The DJ waits for the phrase to resolve before fully committing to the swap.

    85
    21:35

    Quick EQ swap

    A slightly faster transition than the previous ones. A minor level jump is audible but doesn't break the groove.

    78
    24:15

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Flawless execution of a standard melodic techno blend. The transition is almost imperceptible.

    92
    30:12

    Filter-assisted blend

    Good use of high-pass filtering to bring in the new track's percussion without cluttering the mix.

    78

    Technical subscores

    86

    EQ balance

    92

    Beat alignment

    86

    Energy control

    93

    Tempo stability

    85

    Loudness control

    88

    Musical coherence

    87

    Harmonic compatibility

    89

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    28 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    239 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    6,771

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    45

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    107

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    183

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Recurring mid-frequency clash

      Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 2× (21:35, 30:12).

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (8:00, 13:00, 31:00, 43:00, 46:30, 52:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What SOONOS heard

    • Technical blend precision
    • Atmospheric consistency
    • Pacing and restraint
    • Harmonic mixing
    • Pacing
    • Selection

    Timeline

    • 0:00Atmospheric Intro
    • 8:30Groove Lock
    • 21:35Risky pressure or vibe dip
    • 26:45Groove Lock

    Coaching notes

    • Experiment with 3-deck layering to create unique rhythmic textures.
    • Use subtle delay or reverb sends on percussive elements to add spatial depth.
    • Introduce a melodic 'hook' track earlier in the set to create a more memorable emotional peak.
    • Experiment with more aggressive filter work during transitions.
    • Incorporate tracks with more distinct melodic hooks.
    • Vary the phrasing of your EQ swaps to add surprise.
    • Experiment with longer, more dramatic breakdowns.
    • Incorporate more melodic elements to add emotional depth.
    • Use vocal hooks to trigger peak crowd reactions.
    • Vary the transition techniques to include more creative layering.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Moritz Hofbauer's NAX - Support for Ann Clue & Moritz Hofbauer | Live at Serum Chicago - 03.22.2024 get?
    NAX - Support for Ann Clue & Moritz Hofbauer | Live at Serum Chicago - 03.22.2024 scores 78/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is NAX - Support for Ann Clue & Moritz Hofbauer | Live at Serum Chicago - 03.22.2024?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 53m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 85/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 77/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Moritz Hofbauer sets analysed

    Similar high tech minimal sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Moritz Hofbauer analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.