Moritz Hofbauer — Mix Tekno Fluo Acidulé // 127bpm // B.Brejcha, Ann Clue, Deniz Bul, Moritz Hofbauer

    High Tech Minimal · 1h 27m · analysed 24 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    76/100
    Level
    solid
    Duration
    1h 27m
    Genre
    High Tech Minimal

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Moritz Hofbauer.

    In short

    Mix Tekno Fluo Acidulé // 127bpm // B.Brejcha, Ann Clue, Deniz Bul, Moritz Hofbauer by Moritz Hofbauer scores 76/100 in the SOONOS analysis (solid). The strongest dimension is TECHNIQUE (83/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (72/100).

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 29:15, 33:00, 40:00, 65:00, 84:45). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Use shorter loops of the incoming track to build more tension before the full swap.
    • Experiment with 'double-dropping' two tracks with complementary synth leads for a more unique sound.
    • Vary the length of your breakdowns to keep the dancefloor guessing.
    • Experiment with more aggressive high-pass filter builds before drops.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 04:12Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 04:12

      Textbook execution of a minimal techno blend. The transition is almost imperceptible.

    • 08:30Measured (DSP)84/100Listen at 08:30

      Smooth introduction of melodic elements. Slight mid-frequency buildup but well-managed.

    • 24:15Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 24:15

      Perfectly executed transition, maintaining the hypnotic flow without any disruption.

    • 28:40Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 28:40

      Clean use of filters to swap tracks during a low-energy moment, effectively resetting the tension.

    About this high tech minimal set

    Mix Tekno Fluo Acidulé // 127bpm // B.Brejcha, Ann Clue, Deniz Bul, Moritz Hofbauer is a high tech minimal DJ set by Moritz Hofbauer, running 1h 27m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 76/100 overall — solid.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is TECHNIQUE at 83/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 72/100.

    The final score is capped by measured beatmatching: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 32 points, moving between 40 and 85 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    7 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 131.7 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 28 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    On this set, the ceiling applied is measured beatmatching.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%83
    Beat Alignmentmeasured66
    Transition Qualitymeasured89
    Phrase Accuracymeasured88
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured86
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured93
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured73

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%80
    Narrative ArcAI84
    ProgressionAI79
    Tension & ReleaseAI74
    Section AwarenessAI81
    Flow ContinuityAI85
    PayoffAI76

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%76
    Energy Curvemeasured75
    PacingAI78
    MomentumAI84
    Peak ManagementAI78
    Energy HandoffAI79
    Fatigue ControlAI47

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%72
    Unexpected MomentsAI71
    ContrastAI74
    Transition Varietymeasured88
    Selection RiskAI68
    FreshnessAI47
    Surprise ControlAI71

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%83
    Selection QualityAI80
    Identity ConsistencyAI93
    IntentionalityAI81
    ConfidenceAI83
    RestraintAI76
    SignatureAI79

    Final score capped by measured beatmatching — the weighted average before the cap was 79.

    Energy arc

    00:0087:00

    Transitions analysed (7)

    04:12

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Textbook execution of a minimal techno blend. The transition is almost imperceptible.

    92
    08:30

    Progressive layering

    Smooth introduction of melodic elements. Slight mid-frequency buildup but well-managed.

    84
    12:12

    Perfect Blend

    100
    16:12

    Minor EQ Overlap

    82
    20:15

    Seamless Handoff

    100
    24:15

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Perfectly executed transition, maintaining the hypnotic flow without any disruption.

    92
    28:40

    Filter-based transition during breakdown

    Clean use of filters to swap tracks during a low-energy moment, effectively resetting the tension.

    85

    Technical subscores

    86

    EQ balance

    91

    Beat alignment

    81

    Energy control

    93

    Tempo stability

    84

    Loudness control

    86

    Musical coherence

    87

    Harmonic compatibility

    88

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    28 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    36 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    5,222

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    45

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    35

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    219

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 29:15, 33:00, 40:00, 65:00, 84:45). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 00:45Atmospheric Hook
    • 06:15Groove Plateau
    • 26:45Groove Lock Point
    • 29:15Energy Peak
    • 28:40Risky pressure or vibe dip

    Coaching notes

    • Use shorter loops of the incoming track to build more tension before the full swap.
    • Experiment with 'double-dropping' two tracks with complementary synth leads for a more unique sound.
    • Vary the length of your breakdowns to keep the dancefloor guessing.
    • Experiment with more aggressive high-pass filter builds before drops.
    • Incorporate more varied melodic elements to break up the percussive repetition.
    • Try shorter, more impactful transitions to create moments of surprise.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Moritz Hofbauer's Mix Tekno Fluo Acidulé // 127bpm // B.Brejcha, Ann Clue, Deniz Bul, Moritz Hofbauer get?
    Mix Tekno Fluo Acidulé // 127bpm // B.Brejcha, Ann Clue, Deniz Bul, Moritz Hofbauer scores 76/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (solid), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Mix Tekno Fluo Acidulé // 127bpm // B.Brejcha, Ann Clue, Deniz Bul, Moritz Hofbauer?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 27m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    TECHNIQUE is the strongest category at 83/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 72/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Moritz Hofbauer sets analysed

    Similar high tech minimal sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Moritz Hofbauer analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.