Mercer — June 2026 House Anthems Mix 💿
Future House · 1h 14m · analysed 24 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com
Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Mercer.
In short
June 2026 House Anthems Mix 💿 by Mercer scores 68/100 in the SOONOS analysis (developing). The strongest dimension is TECHNIQUE (83/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (66/100).
Technical mastery is the foundation here; the next step is to infuse the set with a more personal and daring artistic voice.
Key takeaways
What weakened the set
- Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (4:00, 8:00, 53:00, 57:30, 62:00, 64:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What to try next
- Experiment with more complex layering and FX during transitions.
- Introduce tracks with more varied textures and emotional depths.
- Use longer breakdowns to create more dramatic tension and release moments.
- Incorporate surprise elements or 'left-field' tracks to elevate crowd excitement.
Timestamped insights
Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.
Smooth low handover on the downbeat, no flam, energy preserved.
Seamless integration of melodic elements, maintaining the uplifting vibe.
Functional swap, though the incoming track's highs were a bit sharp.
Mid-frequency clash between two vocal tracks; sounds cluttered for 4 bars.
About this future house set
June 2026 House Anthems Mix 💿 is a future house DJ set by Mercer, running 1h 14m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 68/100 overall — developing.
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
Technical mastery is the foundation here; the next step is to infuse the set with a more personal and daring artistic voice.
How the score breaks down
SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is TECHNIQUE at 83/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 66/100.
Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.
Energy and structure
The energy curve was sampled at 20 points, moving between 60 and 90 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.
7 transitions were detected and scored individually.
Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 1176.5 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 18 ms.
How this score is built
Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.
Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.
Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.
Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.
Full SOONOS analysis
Technical mastery is the foundation here; the next step is to infuse the set with a more personal and daring artistic voice.
The 8 dimensions
Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.
Score breakdown
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
25%83
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
25%76
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
20%75
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
15%66
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
15%74
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
Energy arc
Transitions analysed (7)
32-bar EQ blend, low swap on phrase
Smooth low handover on the downbeat, no flam, energy preserved.
Long melodic blend with high-pass filter sweep
Seamless integration of melodic elements, maintaining the uplifting vibe.
Short EQ blend
Functional swap, though the incoming track's highs were a bit sharp.
Vocal layering
Mid-frequency clash between two vocal tracks; sounds cluttered for 4 bars.
Perfect Blend
Minor EQ Overlap
Seamless Vocal Swap
Technical subscores
78
EQ balance
89
Beat alignment
78
Energy control
91
Tempo stability
81
Loudness control
79
Musical coherence
82
Harmonic compatibility
82
Transition cleanliness
Measured (DSP)
18 ms
Beat-grid drift (median)
Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.
257 ms
Drift p95
Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.
4,438
Boundaries detected
Points where the audio changes track or section.
43
Hard cuts / h
Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.
123
Clipping events
Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.
204
Level jumps
Sudden volume steps between tracks.
Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.
Recurring patterns
Long static loops (6×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (4:00, 8:00, 53:00, 57:30, 62:00, 64:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
Timeline
- 5:00Vocal Peak
- 9:15Energy Plateau
- 13:10Energy Plateau
- 19:55Strong Drop
- 15:20Transition / momentum break
Coaching notes
- Experiment with more complex layering and FX during transitions.
- Introduce tracks with more varied textures and emotional depths.
- Use longer breakdowns to create more dramatic tension and release moments.
- Incorporate surprise elements or 'left-field' tracks to elevate crowd excitement.
- Experiment with longer, more complex layering to add depth to your transitions.
- Incorporate tracks with different rhythmic structures to keep the groove fresh.
- Use silence or extreme filtering more intentionally to create dramatic tension.
- Look for 'hidden gem' tracks that complement the anthems but add a unique flavor.
Curious how your own set scores?
Methodology and limitations
This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.
Read the full SOONOS methodology →Questions about this analysis
- What score does Mercer's June 2026 House Anthems Mix 💿 get?
- June 2026 House Anthems Mix 💿 scores 68/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (developing), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
- How long is June 2026 House Anthems Mix 💿?
- The analysed recording runs 1h 14m.
- Which part of the mix scores best?
- TECHNIQUE is the strongest category at 83/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 66/100.
- How is this score calculated?
- SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.
More Mercer sets analysed
Similar future house sets
- Mike Williams — Mike Williams On Track #43069
- Mike Williams — Mike Williams On Track #43174
- Tchami — The Calling Mix Vol.174
- Lucas & Steve — Lucas & Steve Radio 15077
- Lucas & Steve — Lucas & Steve Radio 15477
- Lucas & Steve — Lucas & Steve Radio 14479
- Lucas & Steve — Lucas & Steve Radio 13779
- Tchami — Tchami Live @ Social Club79
Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.
Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.
Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research