Margaret Dygas — MARGARET DYGAS ● SUBMARINE -SLASH9.tv

    Indie House · 2h 11m · analysed 24 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    80/100
    Level
    club ready
    Duration
    2h 11m
    Genre
    Indie House

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Margaret Dygas.

    In short

    MARGARET DYGAS ● SUBMARINE -SLASH9.tv by Margaret Dygas scores 80/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (95/100) and the weakest is TECHNIQUE (80/100).

    Mastery is found in what you choose NOT to do; this mix is a testament to the power of restraint.

    Key takeaways

    What worked

    • Technical precision
    • Patient pacing
    • Coherent atmosphere

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 36:00, 42:00, 48:00, 54:00, 60:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Experiment with brief, atmospheric breakdowns to reset the crowd's focus.
    • Introduce a warmer, organic sound to provide a brief emotional contrast.
    • Maintain the current level of technical precision and restraint.
    • Continue to master the art of the 'invisible' transition; it is a hallmark of your style.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 03:12Measured (DSP)94/100Listen at 03:12

      A masterfully executed blend where the tracks merge into a single entity.

    • 09:05Measured (DSP)86/100Listen at 09:05

      Smooth transition focusing on the mid-range textures.

    • 17:00Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 17:00

      Intentional reset

    • 26:15Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 26:15

      Smooth transition between two percussive tracks, maintaining the hypnotic flow.

    • 30:12Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 30:12

      Precise bass handover that keeps the dancefloor locked in.

    About this indie house set

    MARGARET DYGAS ● SUBMARINE -SLASH9.tv is a indie house DJ set by Margaret Dygas, running 2h 11m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 80/100 overall — club ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Mastery is found in what you choose NOT to do; this mix is a testament to the power of restraint.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 95/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 80/100.

    The final score is capped by measured beatmatching: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 46 points, moving between 40 and 85 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    7 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 195.6 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 28 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    On this set, the ceiling applied is measured beatmatching.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    Mastery is found in what you choose NOT to do; this mix is a testament to the power of restraint.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%80
    Beat Alignmentmeasured68
    Transition Qualitymeasured78
    Phrase Accuracymeasured93
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured89
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured90
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured55

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%89
    Narrative ArcAI93
    ProgressionAI88
    Tension & ReleaseAI85
    Section AwarenessAI90
    Flow ContinuityAI94
    PayoffAI81

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%84
    Energy Curvemeasured81
    PacingAI94
    MomentumAI91
    Peak ManagementAI85
    Energy HandoffAI87
    Fatigue ControlAI54

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%83
    Unexpected MomentsAI82
    ContrastAI84
    Transition Varietymeasured94
    Selection RiskAI85
    FreshnessAI55
    Surprise ControlAI82

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%95
    Selection QualityAI92
    Identity ConsistencyAI98
    IntentionalityAI95
    ConfidenceAI93
    RestraintAI97
    SignatureAI94

    Final score capped by measured beatmatching — the weighted average before the cap was 86.

    Energy arc

    00:00130:45

    Transitions analysed (7)

    03:12

    Long-form EQ blend

    A masterfully executed blend where the tracks merge into a single entity.

    94
    09:05

    Subtractive EQ swap

    Smooth transition focusing on the mid-range textures.

    86
    12:45

    Perfect Blend

    100
    17:00

    Minor EQ Overlap

    intentional_reset

    82
    21:25

    Seamless Handover

    100
    26:15

    Long EQ blend, gradual high-pass swap

    Smooth transition between two percussive tracks, maintaining the hypnotic flow.

    82
    30:12

    Low-end swap on phrase boundary

    Precise bass handover that keeps the dancefloor locked in.

    85

    Technical subscores

    89

    EQ balance

    91

    Beat alignment

    84

    Energy control

    90

    Tempo stability

    85

    Loudness control

    89

    Musical coherence

    88

    Harmonic compatibility

    88

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    28 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    85 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    7,860

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    87

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    42

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    846

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 36:00, 42:00, 48:00, 54:00, 60:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What SOONOS heard

    • Technical precision
    • Patient pacing
    • Coherent atmosphere

    Timeline

    • 05:45Atmospheric Peak
    • 11:20Groove Lock
    • 28:45Groove Lock Peak

    Coaching notes

    • Experiment with brief, atmospheric breakdowns to reset the crowd's focus.
    • Introduce a warmer, organic sound to provide a brief emotional contrast.
    • Maintain the current level of technical precision and restraint.
    • Continue to master the art of the 'invisible' transition; it is a hallmark of your style.
    • Experiment with very subtle melodic elements to add another layer of depth to the hypnotic groove.
    • Consider a brief, atmospheric breakdown in future segments to provide a moment of reflection for the crowd.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Margaret Dygas's MARGARET DYGAS ● SUBMARINE -SLASH9.tv get?
    MARGARET DYGAS ● SUBMARINE -SLASH9.tv scores 80/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is MARGARET DYGAS ● SUBMARINE -SLASH9.tv?
    The analysed recording runs 2h 11m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 95/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 80/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Margaret Dygas sets analysed

    Similar indie house sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Margaret Dygas analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.