Lucas & Steve — Lucas & Steve Radio 162
Future House · 1h 00m · analysed 24 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com
Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Lucas & Steve.
In short
Lucas & Steve Radio 162 by Lucas & Steve scores 84/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (88/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (79/100).
The DJ demonstrates a high level of technical mastery and a clear understanding of how to maintain energy for a large-scale audience.
Key takeaways
What weakened the set
- Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (24:00, 30:00, 36:00, 42:45, 48:00, 56:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What to try next
- Introduce more dynamic contrast by including lower-energy bridges between peak tracks.
- Experiment with more complex layering techniques to add a unique artistic signature.
- Incorporate unexpected genre shifts or 'secret weapon' tracks to surprise the audience.
Timestamped insights
Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.
Seamless transition with perfect energy handoff.
Effective use of high-pass filter to clear space for the incoming track.
Clean swap during a melodic breakdown to maintain narrative flow.
Intentional reset
Seamless integration of the incoming bassline while filtering out the outgoing melody.
About this future house set
Lucas & Steve Radio 162 is a future house DJ set by Lucas & Steve, running 1h 00m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 84/100 overall — club ready.
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
The DJ demonstrates a high level of technical mastery and a clear understanding of how to maintain energy for a large-scale audience.
How the score breaks down
SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 88/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 79/100.
Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.
Energy and structure
The energy curve was sampled at 27 points, moving between 60 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.
8 transitions were detected and scored individually.
Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 1537.8 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 27 ms.
How this score is built
Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.
Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.
Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.
Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.
Full SOONOS analysis
The DJ demonstrates a high level of technical mastery and a clear understanding of how to maintain energy for a large-scale audience.
The 8 dimensions
Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.
Score breakdown
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
25%84
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
25%87
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
20%82
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
15%79
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
15%88
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
Energy arc
Transitions analysed (8)
EQ-balanced blend on phrase
Seamless transition with perfect energy handoff.
Filter sweep transition
Effective use of high-pass filter to clear space for the incoming track.
Short blend on breakdown
Clean swap during a melodic breakdown to maintain narrative flow.
Perfect Blend
Seamless Handoff
Minor EQ Overlap
Clean Cut
intentional_reset
8-bar EQ blend, high-pass filter swap
Seamless integration of the incoming bassline while filtering out the outgoing melody.
Technical subscores
90
EQ balance
96
Beat alignment
89
Energy control
97
Tempo stability
91
Loudness control
90
Musical coherence
91
Harmonic compatibility
93
Transition cleanliness
Measured (DSP)
27 ms
Beat-grid drift (median)
Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.
258 ms
Drift p95
Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.
3,585
Boundaries detected
Points where the audio changes track or section.
28
Hard cuts / h
Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.
83
Clipping events
Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.
108
Level jumps
Sudden volume steps between tracks.
Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.
Recurring patterns
Long static loops (6×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (24:00, 30:00, 36:00, 42:45, 48:00, 56:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
Timeline
- 0:45Intro Handoff
- 10:30Peak Energy Drop
Coaching notes
- Introduce more dynamic contrast by including lower-energy bridges between peak tracks.
- Experiment with more complex layering techniques to add a unique artistic signature.
- Incorporate unexpected genre shifts or 'secret weapon' tracks to surprise the audience.
Curious how your own set scores?
Methodology and limitations
This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.
Read the full SOONOS methodology →Questions about this analysis
- What score does Lucas & Steve's Lucas & Steve Radio 162 get?
- Lucas & Steve Radio 162 scores 84/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
- How long is Lucas & Steve Radio 162?
- The analysed recording runs 1h 00m.
- Which part of the mix scores best?
- IDENTITY is the strongest category at 88/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 79/100.
- How is this score calculated?
- SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.
More Lucas & Steve sets analysed
Similar future house sets
- Tchami — Tchami - Confessions #283
- Tchami — Tchami - Ultra Music Festival 2016 [live]86
- Tchami — TCHAMI - ULTRA 2017 [live]86
- Tchami — Tchami - Essential Mix86
- Mike Williams — Mike Williams On Track #42982
- Mike Williams — Mike Williams On Track #42582
- Mike Williams — Mike Williams On Track #42781
- Mike Williams — Mike Williams On Track #43481
Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.
Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.
Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research