Klangkuenstler — klangkuenstler from HÖR Berlin

    Hard Techno · 53 min · analysed 23 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    85/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    53 min
    Genre
    Hard Techno

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Klangkuenstler.

    In short

    klangkuenstler from HÖR Berlin by Klangkuenstler scores 85/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (94/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (80/100).

    This DJ understands that in driving techno, the kick drum is the heartbeat and the percussion is the narrative.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (3×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (32:00, 43:00, 47:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    About this hard techno set

    klangkuenstler from HÖR Berlin is a hard techno DJ set by Klangkuenstler, running 53 min. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 85/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    This DJ understands that in driving techno, the kick drum is the heartbeat and the percussion is the narrative.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 94/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 80/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 16 points, moving between 30 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    11 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 235.8 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 19 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    This DJ understands that in driving techno, the kick drum is the heartbeat and the percussion is the narrative.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%85
    Beat Alignmentmeasured83
    Transition Qualitymeasured77
    Phrase Accuracymeasured92
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured84
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured95
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured80

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%90
    Narrative ArcAI92
    ProgressionAI91
    Tension & ReleaseAI85
    Section AwarenessAI90
    Flow ContinuityAI93
    PayoffAI93

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%85
    Energy Curvemeasured81
    PacingAI89
    MomentumAI95
    Peak ManagementAI88
    Energy HandoffAI93
    Fatigue ControlAI53

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%80
    Unexpected MomentsAI79
    ContrastAI76
    Transition Varietymeasured94
    Selection RiskAI87
    FreshnessAI54
    Surprise ControlAI79

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%94
    Selection QualityAI94
    Identity ConsistencyAI99
    IntentionalityAI95
    ConfidenceAI97
    RestraintAI78
    SignatureAI96

    Energy arc

    0:0053:00

    Transitions analysed (11)

    1:15

    Intro Drop

    strategic_disruption

    100
    3:45

    Percussive Blend

    82
    7:20

    Industrial Handover

    100
    10:15

    Layered Swap

    intentional_reset

    82
    12:14

    Perfect Phase Lock

    100
    14:52

    Minor EQ Overlap

    strategic_disruption

    82
    17:35

    Aggressive Drop Swap

    100
    20:10

    Fast Layering Drift

    intentional_reset

    82
    22:45

    Perfect Handoff

    100
    25:42

    Minor EQ Overlap

    strategic_disruption

    82
    29:40

    Seamless Layering

    100

    Technical subscores

    84

    EQ balance

    91

    Beat alignment

    91

    Energy control

    95

    Tempo stability

    88

    Loudness control

    92

    Musical coherence

    76

    Harmonic compatibility

    85

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    19 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    100 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    3,192

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    90

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    9

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    110

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (3×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (32:00, 43:00, 47:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Klangkuenstler's klangkuenstler from HÖR Berlin get?
    klangkuenstler from HÖR Berlin scores 85/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is klangkuenstler from HÖR Berlin?
    The analysed recording runs 53 min.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 94/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 80/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Klangkuenstler sets analysed

    Similar hard techno sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Klangkuenstler analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.