Juan Atkins — Summer Techno3 - 2019
Classics · 58 min · analysed 18 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com
Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Juan Atkins.
In short
Summer Techno3 - 2019 by Juan Atkins scores 66/100 in the SOONOS analysis (developing). The strongest dimension is TECHNIQUE (82/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (62/100).
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
Key takeaways
What weakened the set
- Long static loops (1×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (29:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What to try next
- Incorporate more melodic elements to create emotional peaks.
- Use breakdowns more strategically to build tension.
- Experiment with shorter, more dynamic transitions to vary the pace.
- Experiment with longer, more atmospheric breakdowns to create greater impact on the drops.
Timestamped insights
Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.
Smooth introduction of the new percussive layer; the transition is almost imperceptible.
Solid transition, though the incoming track is slightly louder in the high-mids.
Smooth transition maintaining the percussive drive; excellent phase alignment.
Effective use of filtering to introduce the next track's top-end energy.
Smooth introduction of new percussive elements over the existing groove.
Functional transition, though the incoming track's low-end is slightly more dominant.
About this classics set
Summer Techno3 - 2019 is a classics DJ set by Juan Atkins, running 58 min. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 66/100 overall — developing.
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
How the score breaks down
SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is TECHNIQUE at 82/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 62/100.
Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.
Energy and structure
The energy curve was sampled at 26 points, moving between 65 and 90 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.
6 transitions were detected and scored individually.
Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 330.7 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 24 ms.
How this score is built
Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.
Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.
Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.
Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.
Full SOONOS analysis
The 8 dimensions
Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.
Score breakdown
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
25%82
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
25%71
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
20%65
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
15%62
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
15%74
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
Energy arc
Transitions analysed (6)
Long EQ blend
Smooth introduction of the new percussive layer; the transition is almost imperceptible.
Low-end swap on phrase
Solid transition, though the incoming track is slightly louder in the high-mids.
32-bar EQ blend, low-end swap on phrase
Smooth transition maintaining the percussive drive; excellent phase alignment.
Long EQ blend with high-pass filtering
Effective use of filtering to introduce the next track's top-end energy.
Long EQ blend
Smooth introduction of new percussive elements over the existing groove.
Bass swap on phrase
Functional transition, though the incoming track's low-end is slightly more dominant.
Technical subscores
77
EQ balance
85
Beat alignment
75
Energy control
88
Tempo stability
78
Loudness control
75
Musical coherence
72
Harmonic compatibility
80
Transition cleanliness
Measured (DSP)
24 ms
Beat-grid drift (median)
Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.
100 ms
Drift p95
Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.
3,463
Boundaries detected
Points where the audio changes track or section.
7
Hard cuts / h
Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.
741
Clipping events
Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.
161
Level jumps
Sudden volume steps between tracks.
Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.
Recurring patterns
Long static loops (1×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (29:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
Timeline
- 5:30Groove Lock Peak
- 10:15Energy Plateau
- 14:22Seamless Handoff
- 16:30Energy Plateau
Coaching notes
- Incorporate more melodic elements to create emotional peaks.
- Use breakdowns more strategically to build tension.
- Experiment with shorter, more dynamic transitions to vary the pace.
- Experiment with longer, more atmospheric breakdowns to create greater impact on the drops.
- Introduce tracks with unique melodic or vocal signatures to break the percussive monotony.
- Practice more creative transition techniques, such as layering melodic stems, to add depth to the blends.
Curious how your own set scores?
Methodology and limitations
This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.
Read the full SOONOS methodology →Questions about this analysis
- What score does Juan Atkins's Summer Techno3 - 2019 get?
- Summer Techno3 - 2019 scores 66/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (developing), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
- How long is Summer Techno3 - 2019?
- The analysed recording runs 58 min.
- Which part of the mix scores best?
- TECHNIQUE is the strongest category at 82/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 62/100.
- How is this score calculated?
- SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.
More Juan Atkins sets analysed
Similar classics sets
- Laurent Garnier — What's Next?! - January 201968
- Laurent Garnier — IIWII - Season 8 - Show 01 (Septembre 2017)68
- Kevin Saunderson — Kevin Saunderson Live @TIMEWARP 201264
- Laurent Garnier — IIWII - Season 7 - Show 09 (Mai 2017)72
- Larry Levan — Studio 54 Remixed Disco Classics WIL176-CHIC,Grace Jones,Sylvester,Sister Sledge,Larry Levan73
- Laurent Garnier — IIWII - Season 7 - Show 10 (Juin 2017)74
- Laurent Garnier — IIWII - Season 8 - Show 08 (Avril 2018)74
- Carl Cox — Carl Cox - Essential Mix 2020-08-0174
Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.
Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.
Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research