Job Jobse — Job Jobse @ Lost in a Moment - TrouwAmsterdam, 11-05-2013

    Indie House · 1h 45m · analysed 23 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    84/100
    Level
    club ready
    Duration
    1h 45m
    Genre
    Indie House

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Job Jobse.

    In short

    Job Jobse @ Lost in a Moment - TrouwAmsterdam, 11-05-2013 by Job Jobse scores 84/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (91/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (80/100).

    The beauty of this set lies in the transitions you don't notice, creating a singular, immersive experience.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 8:00, 20:15, 29:00, 33:00, 58:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Maintain the current level of patience; it is your strongest asset.
    • Consider a brief 'reset' moment with ambient textures to highlight the next build.
    • Experiment with subtle vocal layering to add a human element to the melodic synth work.
    • Maintain the high level of technical precision shown in this segment.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 6:58Measured (DSP)100/100Listen at 6:58

      Intentional reset

    • 14:45Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 14:45

      The transition is almost imperceptible, maintaining the hypnotic flow perfectly.

    • 18:40Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 18:40

      Smooth introduction of new melodic elements while phasing out the previous lead.

    • 23:45Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 23:45

      Perfectly transparent handover of the low end.

    • 27:45Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 27:45

      Keys align perfectly, creating a melodic bridge between tracks.

    About this indie house set

    Job Jobse @ Lost in a Moment - TrouwAmsterdam, 11-05-2013 is a indie house DJ set by Job Jobse, running 1h 45m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 84/100 overall — club ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    The beauty of this set lies in the transitions you don't notice, creating a singular, immersive experience.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 91/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 80/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 45 points, moving between 20 and 88 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 720.6 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 24 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The beauty of this set lies in the transitions you don't notice, creating a singular, immersive experience.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%85
    Beat Alignmentmeasured77
    Transition Qualitymeasured82
    Phrase Accuracymeasured91
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured86
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured90
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%88
    Narrative ArcAI91
    ProgressionAI87
    Tension & ReleaseAI85
    Section AwarenessAI89
    Flow ContinuityAI92
    PayoffAI81

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%83
    Energy Curvemeasured88
    PacingAI91
    MomentumAI89
    Peak ManagementAI85
    Energy HandoffAI86
    Fatigue ControlAI37

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%80
    Unexpected MomentsAI82
    ContrastAI84
    Transition Varietymeasured91
    Selection RiskAI79
    FreshnessAI41
    Surprise ControlAI82

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%91
    Selection QualityAI90
    Identity ConsistencyAI95
    IntentionalityAI91
    ConfidenceAI88
    RestraintAI91
    SignatureAI89

    Energy arc

    0:00105:00

    Transitions analysed (6)

    6:58

    Ghost Blend

    intentional_reset

    100
    10:45

    Percussive Layering

    82
    14:45

    Long EQ blend with subtle low-end swap.

    The transition is almost imperceptible, maintaining the hypnotic flow perfectly.

    92
    18:40

    Melodic layering and high-pass filtering.

    Smooth introduction of new melodic elements while phasing out the previous lead.

    88
    23:45

    Long EQ blend

    Perfectly transparent handover of the low end.

    92
    27:45

    Harmonic blend

    Keys align perfectly, creating a melodic bridge between tracks.

    88

    Technical subscores

    86

    EQ balance

    89

    Beat alignment

    85

    Energy control

    90

    Tempo stability

    85

    Loudness control

    87

    Musical coherence

    91

    Harmonic compatibility

    87

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    24 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    219 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    6,276

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    21

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    116

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    323

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 8:00, 20:15, 29:00, 33:00, 58:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 6:58The Handoff
    • 16:30Groove Lock Achieved
    • 20:45Atmospheric Peak
    • 26:15Atmospheric Peak

    Coaching notes

    • Maintain the current level of patience; it is your strongest asset.
    • Consider a brief 'reset' moment with ambient textures to highlight the next build.
    • Experiment with subtle vocal layering to add a human element to the melodic synth work.
    • Maintain the high level of technical precision shown in this segment.
    • Explore more dramatic tension-building techniques to further elevate peak moments.
    • Continue to prioritize harmonic coherence, as it is a key strength of your style.
    • Experiment with brief moments of silence to heighten the impact of your drops.
    • Incorporate more diverse percussive textures to add grit to the melodic layers.
    • Continue to trust your patience; it is what sets you apart from amateur DJs.
    • Maintain the long-blend philosophy as it defines your artistic identity.
    • Experiment with subtle sub-bass layering to add physical weight to melodic sections.
    • Continue to explore the intersection of nostalgia and driving techno rhythms.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Job Jobse's Job Jobse @ Lost in a Moment - TrouwAmsterdam, 11-05-2013 get?
    Job Jobse @ Lost in a Moment - TrouwAmsterdam, 11-05-2013 scores 84/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Job Jobse @ Lost in a Moment - TrouwAmsterdam, 11-05-2013?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 45m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 91/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 80/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Job Jobse sets analysed

    Similar indie house sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Job Jobse analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.