Four Tet — Return to Plastic People (September 2010) AKA FACT mix 182

    Indie House · 1h 03m · analysed 19 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    83/100
    Level
    club ready
    Duration
    1h 03m
    Genre
    Indie House

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Four Tet.

    In short

    Return to Plastic People (September 2010) AKA FACT mix 182 by Four Tet scores 83/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (91/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (79/100).

    This mix is a reminder that energy is often more effective when it is felt through the groove rather than heard through the volume.

    Key takeaways

    What worked

    • Exceptional track selection and tonal consistency.
    • Professional management of vinyl format characteristics.
    • Masterful use of long, enriching blends.

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (3:37, 12:00, 31:00, 42:00, 48:00, 52:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Introduce more melodic variation to enhance emotional engagement.
    • Experiment with brief silences or breakdowns to create more dynamic contrast.
    • Utilize filter sweeps to add movement to static loops.
    • Continue to explore cross-cultural melodic textures to enhance narrative depth.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 3:05Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 3:05

      A very patient blend that respects the phrasing of both tracks. The low-end handover is seamless.

    • 6:52Measured (DSP)78/100Listen at 6:52

      The DJ uses the percussive elements of the new track to build energy before fully committing to the new groove.

    • 11:15Measured (DSP)94/100Listen at 11:15

      Seamless integration of new percussive elements.

    • 18:45Measured (DSP)90/100Listen at 18:45

      Clean handover of the low-end frequencies.

    • 29:45Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 29:45

      Strategic disruption

    About this indie house set

    Return to Plastic People (September 2010) AKA FACT mix 182 is a indie house DJ set by Four Tet, running 1h 03m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 83/100 overall — club ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    This mix is a reminder that energy is often more effective when it is felt through the groove rather than heard through the volume.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 91/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 79/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 30 points, moving between 20 and 86 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    7 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 483.2 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 20 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    This mix is a reminder that energy is often more effective when it is felt through the groove rather than heard through the volume.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%85
    Beat Alignmentmeasured81
    Transition Qualitymeasured84
    Phrase Accuracymeasured89
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured86
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured88
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured80

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%87
    Narrative ArcAI91
    ProgressionAI86
    Tension & ReleaseAI85
    Section AwarenessAI87
    Flow ContinuityAI91
    PayoffAI81

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%82
    Energy Curvemeasured83
    PacingAI92
    MomentumAI88
    Peak ManagementAI84
    Energy HandoffAI85
    Fatigue ControlAI36

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%79
    Unexpected MomentsAI80
    ContrastAI83
    Transition Varietymeasured91
    Selection RiskAI80
    FreshnessAI42
    Surprise ControlAI80

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%91
    Selection QualityAI90
    Identity ConsistencyAI94
    IntentionalityAI92
    ConfidenceAI89
    RestraintAI92
    SignatureAI89

    Energy arc

    0:0062:00

    Transitions analysed (7)

    3:05

    Long EQ blend, low-end swap at 3:37

    A very patient blend that respects the phrasing of both tracks. The low-end handover is seamless.

    85
    6:52

    Percussive layering with mid-frequency focus

    The DJ uses the percussive elements of the new track to build energy before fully committing to the new groove.

    78
    11:15

    Long EQ blend

    Seamless integration of new percussive elements.

    94
    18:45

    Bass swap on phrase

    Clean handover of the low-end frequencies.

    90
    21:50

    Perfect Blend

    100
    25:50

    Seamless Handover

    100
    29:45

    Minor EQ Overlap

    strategic_disruption

    82

    Technical subscores

    86

    EQ balance

    88

    Beat alignment

    83

    Energy control

    88

    Tempo stability

    81

    Loudness control

    91

    Musical coherence

    89

    Harmonic compatibility

    86

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    20 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    199 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    3,741

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    19

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    173

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    396

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (3:37, 12:00, 31:00, 42:00, 48:00, 52:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What SOONOS heard

    • Exceptional track selection and tonal consistency.
    • Professional management of vinyl format characteristics.
    • Masterful use of long, enriching blends.

    Timeline

    • 3:37The Lock-In
    • 9:48Vinyl Drift Correction
    • 14:20Groove Lock
    • 19:50Atmospheric Shift

    Coaching notes

    • Introduce more melodic variation to enhance emotional engagement.
    • Experiment with brief silences or breakdowns to create more dynamic contrast.
    • Utilize filter sweeps to add movement to static loops.
    • Continue to explore cross-cultural melodic textures to enhance narrative depth.
    • Experiment with subtle rhythmic pulses during long breakdowns to maintain physical engagement.
    • Maintain the high level of technical precision in EQ management during complex layering.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Four Tet's Return to Plastic People (September 2010) AKA FACT mix 182 get?
    Return to Plastic People (September 2010) AKA FACT mix 182 scores 83/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Return to Plastic People (September 2010) AKA FACT mix 182?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 03m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 91/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 79/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Four Tet sets analysed

    Similar indie house sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Four Tet analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.