Doctor P — 2024.07.12 DOCTOR P DJ ( VYNIL )

    Dubstep · 1h 30m · analysed 22 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    73/100
    Level
    solid
    Duration
    1h 30m
    Genre
    Dubstep

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Doctor P.

    In short

    2024.07.12 DOCTOR P DJ ( VYNIL ) by Doctor P scores 73/100 in the SOONOS analysis (solid). The strongest dimension is TECHNIQUE (82/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (67/100).

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Repeated volume jumps (2×) — Gain-staging mismatches break perceived continuity and force the crowd to readjust. Detected 2× (16:12, 28:40).
    • Recurring BPM drift (2×) — Sustained tempo drift loosens the groove and breaks dancer flow. Detected 2× (16:12, 28:40).
    • Long static loops (4×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (30:00, 45:00, 52:30, 67:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Experiment with more dramatic high-pass filter sweeps to create tension before drops.
    • Incorporate a 'wildcard' track from a slightly different genre to surprise the audience.
    • Use the third deck (if available) to layer percussive loops over the main tracks for added texture.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 5:12Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 5:12

      Very smooth transition, almost imperceptible handover of the low end.

    • 10:20Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 10:20

      Solid technical execution, though a very slight volume increase was noted.

    • 13:45Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 13:45

      Smooth transition, well-phrased with a clean bass handover.

    • 16:12Measured (DSP)55/100Listen at 16:12

      Audible phase drift for ~4 bars, corrected manually. Typical vinyl charm but slightly messy.

    • 20:30Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 20:30

      High-energy swap that injects fresh momentum into the set.

    • 24:15Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 24:15

      Smooth transition maintaining the vocal energy while introducing a new percussive layer.

    • 28:40Measured (DSP)72/100Listen at 28:40

      Slightly abrupt change in the mid-range texture, though the beat remains locked.

    About this dubstep set

    2024.07.12 DOCTOR P DJ ( VYNIL ) is a dubstep DJ set by Doctor P, running 1h 30m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 73/100 overall — solid.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is TECHNIQUE at 82/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 67/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 37 points, moving between 60 and 88 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.

    7 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 202.8 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 20 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%82
    Beat Alignmentmeasured81
    Transition Qualitymeasured90
    Phrase Accuracymeasured81
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured77
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured79
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%76
    Narrative ArcAI78
    ProgressionAI73
    Tension & ReleaseAI70
    Section AwarenessAI76
    Flow ContinuityAI83
    PayoffAI77

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%71
    Energy Curvemeasured69
    PacingAI73
    MomentumAI85
    Peak ManagementAI73
    Energy HandoffAI78
    Fatigue ControlAI37

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%67
    Unexpected MomentsAI68
    ContrastAI65
    Transition Varietymeasured81
    Selection RiskAI69
    FreshnessAI38
    Surprise ControlAI68

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%80
    Selection QualityAI79
    Identity ConsistencyAI90
    IntentionalityAI78
    ConfidenceAI81
    RestraintAI71
    SignatureAI73

    Energy arc

    0:0078:00

    Transitions analysed (7)

    5:12

    Long EQ blend

    Very smooth transition, almost imperceptible handover of the low end.

    88
    10:20

    EQ swap on phrase

    Solid technical execution, though a very slight volume increase was noted.

    82
    13:45

    EQ blend with low-end swap

    Smooth transition, well-phrased with a clean bass handover.

    82
    16:12

    Long blend with manual correction

    Audible phase drift for ~4 bars, corrected manually. Typical vinyl charm but slightly messy.

    55
    20:30

    Fast layering with high-pass filter

    High-energy swap that injects fresh momentum into the set.

    85
    24:15

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Smooth transition maintaining the vocal energy while introducing a new percussive layer.

    85
    28:40

    Quick mid-frequency swap

    Slightly abrupt change in the mid-range texture, though the beat remains locked.

    72

    Technical subscores

    77

    EQ balance

    79

    Beat alignment

    79

    Energy control

    79

    Tempo stability

    77

    Loudness control

    77

    Musical coherence

    77

    Harmonic compatibility

    77

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    20 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    126 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    5,361

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    26

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    364

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    135

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Repeated volume jumps

      Gain-staging mismatches break perceived continuity and force the crowd to readjust. Detected 2× (16:12, 28:40).

    • Recurring BPM drift

      Sustained tempo drift loosens the groove and breaks dancer flow. Detected 2× (16:12, 28:40).

    • Long static loops (4×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (30:00, 45:00, 52:30, 67:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 3:15Vocal Hook Impact
    • 7:45Groove Plateau
    • 12:15Groove Lock
    • 16:15Phase Drift
    • 21:00Energy Peak
    • 16:12Risky pressure or vibe dip
    • 20:30Risky pressure or vibe dip
    • 26:45Vocal Hook Peak
    • 28:40Risky pressure or vibe dip

    Coaching notes

    • Experiment with more dramatic high-pass filter sweeps to create tension before drops.
    • Incorporate a 'wildcard' track from a slightly different genre to surprise the audience.
    • Use the third deck (if available) to layer percussive loops over the main tracks for added texture.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Doctor P's 2024.07.12 DOCTOR P DJ ( VYNIL ) get?
    2024.07.12 DOCTOR P DJ ( VYNIL ) scores 73/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (solid), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is 2024.07.12 DOCTOR P DJ ( VYNIL )?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 30m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    TECHNIQUE is the strongest category at 82/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 67/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Doctor P sets analysed

    Similar dubstep sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Doctor P analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.