Dion Timmer — SUPPORT SET FOR DION TIMMER - ARSENIIC LIVE AT SUNBAR

    Electro House · 1h 15m · analysed 22 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    71/100
    Level
    solid
    Duration
    1h 15m
    Genre
    Electro House

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Dion Timmer.

    In short

    SUPPORT SET FOR DION TIMMER - ARSENIIC LIVE AT SUNBAR by Dion Timmer scores 71/100 in the SOONOS analysis (solid). The strongest dimension is TECHNIQUE (81/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (72/100).

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Recurring mid-frequency clash (3×) — Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 3× (2:10, 18:22, 21:45).
    • Repeated volume jumps (3×) — Gain-staging mismatches break perceived continuity and force the crowd to readjust. Detected 3× (12:45, 18:22, 26:22).
    • Repeated key clashes (2×) — Mismatched keys produce dissonance that drains energy from the floor. Detected 2× (18:22, 26:22).
    • Long static loops (5×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (23:30, 29:00, 32:00, 38:00, 64:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Use more dynamic EQ to carve space for competing basslines.
    • Incorporate more varied rhythmic structures to keep the listener engaged.
    • Experiment with longer, more atmospheric breakdowns to enhance the impact of the drops.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 2:10Measured (DSP)75/100Listen at 2:10

      Effective transition, though the mid-range swap was slightly noticeable.

    • 7:45Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 7:45

      High-impact transition that perfectly maintains energy.

    • 12:45Measured (DSP)78/100Listen at 12:45

      Effective energy transfer, though the incoming track was slightly louder.

    • 18:22Measured (DSP)65/100Listen at 18:22

      The transition felt slightly rushed, cutting off the tail of the previous track's reverb.

    • 21:45Measured (DSP)75/100Listen at 21:45

      Effective energy handoff, though slightly crowded in the 2kHz range.

    • 26:22Measured (DSP)68/100Listen at 26:22

      Ambitious layering that results in some frequency masking in the low-mids.

    About this electro house set

    SUPPORT SET FOR DION TIMMER - ARSENIIC LIVE AT SUNBAR is a electro house DJ set by Dion Timmer, running 1h 15m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 71/100 overall — solid.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is TECHNIQUE at 81/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 72/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 27 points, moving between 40 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 717.4 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 26 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%81
    Beat Alignmentmeasured72
    Transition Qualitymeasured85
    Phrase Accuracymeasured85
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured75
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured90
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured80

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%81
    Narrative ArcAI81
    ProgressionAI78
    Tension & ReleaseAI80
    Section AwarenessAI80
    Flow ContinuityAI78
    PayoffAI91

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%73
    Energy Curvemeasured73
    PacingAI70
    MomentumAI88
    Peak ManagementAI79
    Energy HandoffAI82
    Fatigue ControlAI34

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%72
    Unexpected MomentsAI76
    ContrastAI73
    Transition Varietymeasured90
    Selection RiskAI66
    FreshnessAI29
    Surprise ControlAI76

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%80
    Selection QualityAI78
    Identity ConsistencyAI93
    IntentionalityAI81
    ConfidenceAI85
    RestraintAI59
    SignatureAI76

    Energy arc

    0:0074:49

    Transitions analysed (6)

    2:10

    EQ blend with high-pass filter

    Effective transition, though the mid-range swap was slightly noticeable.

    75
    7:45

    Drop swap

    High-impact transition that perfectly maintains energy.

    88
    12:45

    Drop-swap with high-pass filter

    Effective energy transfer, though the incoming track was slightly louder.

    78
    18:22

    Quick cut on the snare

    The transition felt slightly rushed, cutting off the tail of the previous track's reverb.

    65
    21:45

    Quick EQ swap on the drop

    Effective energy handoff, though slightly crowded in the 2kHz range.

    75
    26:22

    Double-drop layering

    Ambitious layering that results in some frequency masking in the low-mids.

    68

    Technical subscores

    75

    EQ balance

    87

    Beat alignment

    84

    Energy control

    90

    Tempo stability

    77

    Loudness control

    74

    Musical coherence

    74

    Harmonic compatibility

    79

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    26 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    182 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    4,472

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    0

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    0

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    10

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 99% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Recurring mid-frequency clash

      Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 3× (2:10, 18:22, 21:45).

    • Repeated volume jumps

      Gain-staging mismatches break perceived continuity and force the crowd to readjust. Detected 3× (12:45, 18:22, 26:22).

    • Repeated key clashes

      Mismatched keys produce dissonance that drains energy from the floor. Detected 2× (18:22, 26:22).

    • Long static loops (5×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (23:30, 29:00, 32:00, 38:00, 64:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 1:15Energy Spike
    • 5:45Tension Plateau
    • 15:30Energy Plateau
    • 19:45Double Drop Peak
    • 18:22Risky pressure or vibe dip
    • 23:45Peak Energy Drop
    • 29:12Vibe Reset
    • 26:22Risky pressure or vibe dip

    Coaching notes

    • Use more dynamic EQ to carve space for competing basslines.
    • Incorporate more varied rhythmic structures to keep the listener engaged.
    • Experiment with longer, more atmospheric breakdowns to enhance the impact of the drops.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Dion Timmer's SUPPORT SET FOR DION TIMMER - ARSENIIC LIVE AT SUNBAR get?
    SUPPORT SET FOR DION TIMMER - ARSENIIC LIVE AT SUNBAR scores 71/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (solid), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is SUPPORT SET FOR DION TIMMER - ARSENIIC LIVE AT SUNBAR?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 15m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    TECHNIQUE is the strongest category at 81/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 72/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Dion Timmer sets analysed

    Similar electro house sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Dion Timmer analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.