Dion Timmer — LIVE SET - 5/27/17 - Dion Timmer Support Set

    Electro House · 1h 01m · analysed 22 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    69/100
    Level
    developing
    Duration
    1h 01m
    Genre
    Electro House

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Dion Timmer.

    In short

    LIVE SET - 5/27/17 - Dion Timmer Support Set by Dion Timmer scores 69/100 in the SOONOS analysis (developing). The strongest dimension is TECHNIQUE (80/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (66/100).

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (3×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (26:00, 30:00, 34:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    About this electro house set

    LIVE SET - 5/27/17 - Dion Timmer Support Set is a electro house DJ set by Dion Timmer, running 1h 01m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 69/100 overall — developing.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is TECHNIQUE at 80/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 66/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 7 points, moving between 82 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a narrow dynamic range across the set.

    11 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 572.4 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 21 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%80
    Beat Alignmentmeasured80
    Transition Qualitymeasured83
    Phrase Accuracymeasured79
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured71
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured85
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured77

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%74
    Narrative ArcAI73
    ProgressionAI67
    Tension & ReleaseAI75
    Section AwarenessAI74
    Flow ContinuityAI72
    PayoffAI91

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%69
    Energy Curvemeasured60
    PacingAI62
    MomentumAI86
    Peak ManagementAI75
    Energy HandoffAI81
    Fatigue ControlAI48

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%66
    Unexpected MomentsAI69
    ContrastAI58
    Transition Varietymeasured87
    Selection RiskAI61
    FreshnessAI37
    Surprise ControlAI69

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%76
    Selection QualityAI78
    Identity ConsistencyAI90
    IntentionalityAI76
    ConfidenceAI85
    RestraintAI51
    SignatureAI70

    Energy arc

    24:0036:00

    Transitions analysed (11)

    0:45

    Perfect Hype Entry

    strategic_disruption

    100
    3:12

    Minor EQ Overlap

    82
    5:15

    Clean Drop Swap

    intentional_reset

    100
    7:30

    Noticeable Level Jump

    64
    10:42

    Slight Phrasing Drift

    82
    12:34

    Perfect Cut

    intentional_reset

    100
    16:22

    Minor EQ Overlap

    82
    19:05

    Peak Double Drop

    strategic_disruption

    100
    22:00

    Noticeable Level Jump

    64
    25:30

    Quick EQ swap

    Mids clash slightly during the handoff, creating a brief moment of muddiness.

    65
    29:15

    Drop swap

    Perfectly timed energy handoff at the drop; crowd impact is maximized.

    92

    Technical subscores

    71

    EQ balance

    80

    Beat alignment

    84

    Energy control

    85

    Tempo stability

    74

    Loudness control

    70

    Musical coherence

    67

    Harmonic compatibility

    74

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    21 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    204 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    3,630

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    23

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    31

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    353

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (3×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (26:00, 30:00, 34:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 7:30Risky pressure or vibe dip
    • 22:00Risky pressure or vibe dip
    • 27:45Energy Plateau
    • 25:30Risky pressure or vibe dip
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Dion Timmer's LIVE SET - 5/27/17 - Dion Timmer Support Set get?
    LIVE SET - 5/27/17 - Dion Timmer Support Set scores 69/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (developing), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is LIVE SET - 5/27/17 - Dion Timmer Support Set?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 01m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    TECHNIQUE is the strongest category at 80/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 66/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Dion Timmer sets analysed

    Similar electro house sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Dion Timmer analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.