Derrick May — DERRICK MAY | DREAMING FESTIVAL 2025

    Classics · 2h 03m · analysed 18 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    87/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    2h 03m
    Genre
    Classics

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Derrick May.

    In short

    DERRICK MAY | DREAMING FESTIVAL 2025 by Derrick May scores 87/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (96/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (84/100).

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (45:00, 49:00, 78:00, 82:00, 86:00, 115:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Continue to leverage classic anthems for high-impact festival closings.
    • Maintain the balance between driving percussion and melodic depth.
    • Explore even longer blends to further enhance the hypnotic quality of the set.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    About this classics set

    DERRICK MAY | DREAMING FESTIVAL 2025 is a classics DJ set by Derrick May, running 2h 03m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 87/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 96/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 84/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 20 points, moving between 20 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    8 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 315.4 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 20 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%85
    Beat Alignmentmeasured81
    Transition Qualitymeasured85
    Phrase Accuracymeasured91
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured84
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured86
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured76

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%92
    Narrative ArcAI93
    ProgressionAI92
    Tension & ReleaseAI90
    Section AwarenessAI91
    Flow ContinuityAI95
    PayoffAI94

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%86
    Energy Curvemeasured85
    PacingAI93
    MomentumAI95
    Peak ManagementAI89
    Energy HandoffAI94
    Fatigue ControlAI43

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%84
    Unexpected MomentsAI86
    ContrastAI83
    Transition Varietymeasured95
    Selection RiskAI92
    FreshnessAI42
    Surprise ControlAI86

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%96
    Selection QualityAI96
    Identity ConsistencyAI98
    IntentionalityAI97
    ConfidenceAI97
    RestraintAI88
    SignatureAI97

    Energy arc

    45:00123:00

    Transitions analysed (8)

    3:45

    Manual Phase Correction

    strategic_disruption

    82
    7:15

    Perfect Percussive Layer

    100
    9:45

    EQ Overlap

    intentional_reset

    64
    12:12

    Long percussive blend

    Seamless integration of the new kick pattern.

    90
    16:25

    EQ-based transition

    Smooth handover of the mid-range frequencies.

    85
    20:10

    Power swap on the drop

    High-impact transition that resets the energy for the peak.

    88
    23:45

    Percussive Overlay

    intentional_reset

    82
    28:00

    Perfect Groove Lock

    100

    Technical subscores

    84

    EQ balance

    83

    Beat alignment

    90

    Energy control

    86

    Tempo stability

    85

    Loudness control

    91

    Musical coherence

    81

    Harmonic compatibility

    82

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    20 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    133 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    7,364

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    56

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    83

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    189

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (45:00, 49:00, 78:00, 82:00, 86:00, 115:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 9:45Risky pressure or vibe dip
    • 14:20Groove Lock
    • 20:10Peak Energy Release

    Coaching notes

    • Continue to leverage classic anthems for high-impact festival closings.
    • Maintain the balance between driving percussion and melodic depth.
    • Explore even longer blends to further enhance the hypnotic quality of the set.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Derrick May's DERRICK MAY | DREAMING FESTIVAL 2025 get?
    DERRICK MAY | DREAMING FESTIVAL 2025 scores 87/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is DERRICK MAY | DREAMING FESTIVAL 2025?
    The analysed recording runs 2h 03m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 96/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 84/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Derrick May sets analysed

    Similar classics sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Derrick May analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.