Derrick Carter — DJ Sneak + Derrick Carter + Mark Farina Heroes of House Metro 4 17 15 Chicago Pt. 2

    House · 2h 02m · analysed 19 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    87/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    2h 02m
    Genre
    House

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Derrick Carter.

    In short

    DJ Sneak + Derrick Carter + Mark Farina Heroes of House Metro 4 17 15 Chicago Pt. 2 by Derrick Carter scores 87/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (94/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (84/100).

    This mix demonstrates the power of a well-maintained groove in keeping a dancefloor engaged.

    Key takeaways

    What worked

    • Infectious rhythmic swing
    • Seamless EQ management
    • Authentic track selection

    What weakened the set

    • Recurring mid-frequency clash (2×) — Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 2× (8:15, 28:30).
    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 11:00, 28:45, 44:00, 55:00, 60:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Experiment with longer, more dramatic filter sweeps to build tension.
    • Incorporate a few tracks with more prominent melodic hooks to broaden the appeal.
    • Ensure the high-frequency percussion is balanced to avoid listener fatigue over a long set.
    • Experiment with more creative transition techniques.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 3:45Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 3:45

      A smooth transition that prioritizes the continuation of the rhythmic pocket.

    • 8:15Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 8:15

      Effective use of EQ to swap the low-end energy between tracks.

    • 13:20Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 13:20

      Flawless transition with perfect beatmatching and phrase alignment.

    • 17:45Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 17:45

      Smooth transition, maintaining energy and groove.

    • 23:15Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 23:15

      Seamless integration of the incoming rhythm, maintaining the jacking pocket perfectly.

    • 28:30Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 28:30

      Expertly timed vocal entry that captures the energy of the room.

    About this house set

    DJ Sneak + Derrick Carter + Mark Farina Heroes of House Metro 4 17 15 Chicago Pt. 2 is a house DJ set by Derrick Carter, running 2h 02m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 87/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    This mix demonstrates the power of a well-maintained groove in keeping a dancefloor engaged.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 94/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 84/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 60 points, moving between 75 and 94 on the SOONOS energy scale — a narrow dynamic range across the set.

    6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 150.6 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 22 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    This mix demonstrates the power of a well-maintained groove in keeping a dancefloor engaged.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%87
    Beat Alignmentmeasured80
    Transition Qualitymeasured90
    Phrase Accuracymeasured92
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured85
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured91
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured80

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%90
    Narrative ArcAI91
    ProgressionAI89
    Tension & ReleaseAI86
    Section AwarenessAI90
    Flow ContinuityAI94
    PayoffAI90

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%88
    Energy Curvemeasured85
    PacingAI91
    MomentumAI94
    Peak ManagementAI87
    Energy HandoffAI88
    Fatigue ControlAI79

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%84
    Unexpected MomentsAI82
    ContrastAI81
    Transition Varietymeasured92
    Selection RiskAI88
    FreshnessAI75
    Surprise ControlAI82

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%94
    Selection QualityAI94
    Identity ConsistencyAI97
    IntentionalityAI94
    ConfidenceAI95
    RestraintAI87
    SignatureAI95

    Energy arc

    0:00121:50

    Transitions analysed (6)

    3:45

    Long percussive blend with EQ sculpting

    A smooth transition that prioritizes the continuation of the rhythmic pocket.

    85
    8:15

    EQ swap on the phrase

    Effective use of EQ to swap the low-end energy between tracks.

    82
    13:20

    Long EQ blend, low swap on phrase

    Flawless transition with perfect beatmatching and phrase alignment.

    92
    17:45

    EQ blend with high-pass filter sweep

    Smooth transition, maintaining energy and groove.

    88
    23:15

    Long percussive blend with gradual EQ swap

    Seamless integration of the incoming rhythm, maintaining the jacking pocket perfectly.

    92
    28:30

    Vocal-led transition with mid-range focus

    Expertly timed vocal entry that captures the energy of the room.

    88

    Technical subscores

    85

    EQ balance

    90

    Beat alignment

    89

    Energy control

    91

    Tempo stability

    87

    Loudness control

    92

    Musical coherence

    84

    Harmonic compatibility

    86

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    22 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    49 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    7,292

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    24

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    73

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    175

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Recurring mid-frequency clash

      Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 2× (8:15, 28:30).

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 11:00, 28:45, 44:00, 55:00, 60:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What SOONOS heard

    • Infectious rhythmic swing
    • Seamless EQ management
    • Authentic track selection

    Timeline

    • 4:50Vocal Peak
    • 9:45Rhythmic Complexity
    • 15:30Groove Lock
    • 20:15Energy Peak
    • 25:30Groove Lock Peak

    Coaching notes

    • Experiment with longer, more dramatic filter sweeps to build tension.
    • Incorporate a few tracks with more prominent melodic hooks to broaden the appeal.
    • Ensure the high-frequency percussion is balanced to avoid listener fatigue over a long set.
    • Experiment with more creative transition techniques.
    • Introduce more dramatic breakdowns.
    • Explore slightly more melodic house variations.
    • Maintain the current level of rhythmic consistency; it is your greatest strength.
    • Use subtle filter automation to add movement to long percussive loops.
    • Consider a 'reset' moment every 15-20 minutes to enhance the impact of the next build.
    • Experiment with more dramatic filter sweeps to accentuate transitions.
    • Try layering a third percussive element during the longest blends for added complexity.
    • Use a short, silent pause (1-2 beats) before a major drop to create a 'gasp' moment.
    • Experiment with longer melodic breakdowns.
    • Use subtle reverb washes to create more atmospheric depth.
    • Maintain the current level of percussive layering.
    • Experiment with brief silent gaps (1/4 bar) before major drops to accentuate the impact.
    • Use the mid-range EQ more aggressively to carve out space for overlapping vocal samples.
    • Consider a 'reset' track with a long melodic breakdown to provide contrast to the jacking rhythm.
    • Experiment with longer, more filtered breakdowns to create more dramatic tension.
    • Use subtle delay or reverb on the vocal loops to integrate them more deeply into the mix.
    • Monitor the master output levels when layering multiple high-energy tracks to avoid digital clipping.
    • Continue to use long, EQ-focused blends to maintain the hypnotic state.
    • Leverage soulful vocal elements to provide emotional peaks within the percussive drive.
    • Maintain the high-quality gain staging observed in this segment.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Derrick Carter's DJ Sneak + Derrick Carter + Mark Farina Heroes of House Metro 4 17 15 Chicago Pt. 2 get?
    DJ Sneak + Derrick Carter + Mark Farina Heroes of House Metro 4 17 15 Chicago Pt. 2 scores 87/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is DJ Sneak + Derrick Carter + Mark Farina Heroes of House Metro 4 17 15 Chicago Pt. 2?
    The analysed recording runs 2h 02m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 94/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 84/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Derrick Carter sets analysed

    Similar house sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Derrick Carter analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Loading…