David Morales — LIVE : David Morales @ Cirkus (Ljubljana - May 2015)

    Classics · 1h 02m · analysed 19 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    86/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    1h 02m
    Genre
    Classics

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, David Morales.

    In short

    LIVE : David Morales @ Cirkus (Ljubljana - May 2015) by David Morales scores 86/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (94/100) and the weakest is TECHNIQUE (83/100).

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 17:30, 21:00, 25:00, 31:00, 35:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Maintain the patient phrasing; it allows the tracks to breathe.
    • Continue using high-quality vocal stems for layering.
    • Experiment with brief, high-pass filter resets to emphasize the re-entry of the kick drum.
    • Maintain the current balance of vocal and percussive elements.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 05:15Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 05:15

      A textbook house transition. The incoming bassline is introduced so subtly that the groove feels like a single evolving track.

    • 09:42Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 09:42

      Slightly more noticeable than the first, with a minor build-up of high frequencies as the tracks overlap.

    • 11:15Measured (DSP)90/100Listen at 11:15

      Seamless transition maintaining the percussive drive.

    • 16:20Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 16:20

      Expertly managed vocal entry that builds significant tension.

    • 23:42Measured (DSP)90/100Listen at 23:42

      Expertly handled transition that prioritizes the incoming vocal hook while maintaining the low-end groove.

    • 29:15Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 29:15

      Smooth transition between two high-energy house tracks, maintaining the rhythmic momentum.

    About this classics set

    LIVE : David Morales @ Cirkus (Ljubljana - May 2015) is a classics DJ set by David Morales, running 1h 02m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 86/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 94/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 83/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 30 points, moving between 65 and 92 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.

    6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 279.2 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 22 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%83
    Beat Alignmentmeasured79
    Transition Qualitymeasured84
    Phrase Accuracymeasured93
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured85
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured93
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured50

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%90
    Narrative ArcAI91
    ProgressionAI88
    Tension & ReleaseAI88
    Section AwarenessAI90
    Flow ContinuityAI93
    PayoffAI92

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%88
    Energy Curvemeasured91
    PacingAI92
    MomentumAI94
    Peak ManagementAI87
    Energy HandoffAI89
    Fatigue ControlAI61

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%83
    Unexpected MomentsAI82
    ContrastAI82
    Transition Varietymeasured91
    Selection RiskAI88
    FreshnessAI63
    Surprise ControlAI82

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%94
    Selection QualityAI94
    Identity ConsistencyAI97
    IntentionalityAI95
    ConfidenceAI94
    RestraintAI87
    SignatureAI93

    Energy arc

    00:0052:00

    Transitions analysed (6)

    05:15

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    A textbook house transition. The incoming bassline is introduced so subtly that the groove feels like a single evolving track.

    92
    09:42

    EQ-heavy blend during a breakdown

    Slightly more noticeable than the first, with a minor build-up of high frequencies as the tracks overlap.

    82
    11:15

    Long EQ blend, low-end swap on phrase

    Seamless transition maintaining the percussive drive.

    90
    16:20

    Vocal layering and high-pass filter sweep

    Expertly managed vocal entry that builds significant tension.

    88
    23:42

    Long EQ blend with vocal priority

    Expertly handled transition that prioritizes the incoming vocal hook while maintaining the low-end groove.

    90
    29:15

    Phased percussion swap

    Smooth transition between two high-energy house tracks, maintaining the rhythmic momentum.

    85

    Technical subscores

    85

    EQ balance

    92

    Beat alignment

    89

    Energy control

    93

    Tempo stability

    86

    Loudness control

    91

    Musical coherence

    89

    Harmonic compatibility

    87

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    22 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    200 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    3,714

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    26

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    0

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    128

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 17:30, 21:00, 25:00, 31:00, 35:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 00:45Groove Establishment
    • 06:30Vocal Introduction
    • 09:42Risky pressure or vibe dip
    • 17:45Vocal Peak
    • 19:15Groove Re-entry
    • 24:52Vocal Peak
    • 27:30Groove Lock

    Coaching notes

    • Maintain the patient phrasing; it allows the tracks to breathe.
    • Continue using high-quality vocal stems for layering.
    • Experiment with brief, high-pass filter resets to emphasize the re-entry of the kick drum.
    • Maintain the current balance of vocal and percussive elements.
    • Use more dramatic filter sweeps to enhance tension during breakdowns.
    • Consider a brief 'reset' moment to provide contrast to the high-energy plateau.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does David Morales's LIVE : David Morales @ Cirkus (Ljubljana - May 2015) get?
    LIVE : David Morales @ Cirkus (Ljubljana - May 2015) scores 86/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is LIVE : David Morales @ Cirkus (Ljubljana - May 2015)?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 02m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 94/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 83/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More David Morales sets analysed

    Similar classics sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All David Morales analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.