Daniel Avery — Daniel Avery - NTS Radio (4th December 2018)

    Indie House · 1h 00m · analysed 22 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    72/100
    Level
    solid
    Duration
    1h 00m
    Genre
    Indie House

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Daniel Avery.

    In short

    Daniel Avery - NTS Radio (4th December 2018) by Daniel Avery scores 72/100 in the SOONOS analysis (solid). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (95/100) and the weakest is TECHNIQUE (55/100).

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (2×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (8:00, 48:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 02:10Measured (DSP)95/100Listen at 02:10

      Seamless integration of textures; the tracks are indistinguishable.

    • 07:45Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 07:45

      Smooth transition of the percussive core; energy is perfectly maintained.

    • 25:42Measured (DSP)94/100Listen at 25:42

      A textbook hypnotic techno transition. The incoming track's sub-bass replaces the outgoing one so smoothly it feels like a single evolving piece.

    About this indie house set

    Daniel Avery - NTS Radio (4th December 2018) is a indie house DJ set by Daniel Avery, running 1h 00m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 72/100 overall — solid.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 95/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 55/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 14 points, moving between 10 and 88 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    5 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 1927.5 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 78 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%55
    Beat Alignmentmeasured15
    Transition Qualitymeasured81
    Phrase Accuracymeasured94
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured89
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured95
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured74

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%89
    Narrative ArcAI94
    ProgressionAI90
    Tension & ReleaseAI85
    Section AwarenessAI90
    Flow ContinuityAI94
    PayoffAI80

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%84
    Energy Curvemeasured88
    PacingAI94
    MomentumAI89
    Peak ManagementAI88
    Energy HandoffAI88
    Fatigue ControlAI37

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%82
    Unexpected MomentsAI84
    ContrastAI86
    Transition Varietymeasured94
    Selection RiskAI87
    FreshnessAI38
    Surprise ControlAI84

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%95
    Selection QualityAI92
    Identity ConsistencyAI97
    IntentionalityAI95
    ConfidenceAI94
    RestraintAI95
    SignatureAI95

    Energy arc

    00:0060:00

    Transitions analysed (5)

    02:10

    Long atmospheric blend

    Seamless integration of textures; the tracks are indistinguishable.

    95
    07:45

    EQ-led rhythmic swap

    Smooth transition of the percussive core; energy is perfectly maintained.

    88
    16:15

    Perfect Blend

    100
    21:00

    Seamless Handover

    100
    25:42

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    A textbook hypnotic techno transition. The incoming track's sub-bass replaces the outgoing one so smoothly it feels like a single evolving piece.

    94

    Technical subscores

    89

    EQ balance

    95

    Beat alignment

    87

    Energy control

    95

    Tempo stability

    89

    Loudness control

    90

    Musical coherence

    90

    Harmonic compatibility

    92

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    78 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    237 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    3,587

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    24

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    70

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    404

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 98% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (2×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (8:00, 48:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 00:05Atmospheric Hook
    • 11:45Voiceover Entry
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Daniel Avery's Daniel Avery - NTS Radio (4th December 2018) get?
    Daniel Avery - NTS Radio (4th December 2018) scores 72/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (solid), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Daniel Avery - NTS Radio (4th December 2018)?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 00m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 95/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 55/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Daniel Avery sets analysed

    Similar indie house sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Daniel Avery analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.