What score does Clara Cuvé's SPFDJ with Clara Cuvé - 08 October 2019 get?

SPFDJ with Clara Cuvé - 08 October 2019 scores 85/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.

How long is SPFDJ with Clara Cuvé - 08 October 2019?

The analysed recording runs 2h 00m.

Which part of the mix scores best?

IDENTITY is the strongest category at 93/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 81/100.

How is this score calculated?

SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

Clara Cuvé

Clara Cuvé — SPFDJ with Clara Cuvé - 08 October 2019

Hard Techno · 2h 00m · analysed 22 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

Overall score

85/100

Level

festival ready

Duration

2h 00m

Genre

Hard Techno

Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Clara Cuvé.

In short

SPFDJ with Clara Cuvé - 08 October 2019 by Clara Cuvé scores 85/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (93/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (81/100).

This mix demonstrates how to maintain extreme tension without losing the groove.

Key takeaways

What weakened the set

Recurring mid-frequency clash (2×) — Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 2× (08:45, 29:45).
Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (14:00, 20:00, 30:00, 36:00, 44:00, 72:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

What to try next

Experiment with brief atmospheric breakdowns to create more dynamic range.
Incorporate more varied mid-range textures to further distinguish the narrative chapters.
Maintain the current level of technical precision; it is a significant strength.
Incorporate more dramatic breakdowns to enhance tension.

Timestamped insights

Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

04:22Measured (DSP)90/100Listen at 04:22
Seamless transition between two high-energy percussive tracks.
08:45Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 08:45
Effective layering of two drum patterns to increase density.
13:15Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 13:15
Smooth transition maintaining the percussive drive.
19:50Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 19:50
High-impact transition that perfectly captures the peak energy.
25:12Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 25:12
Perfectly timed transition that maintains the driving momentum without a dip in energy.
29:45Measured (DSP)84/100Listen at 29:45
Smooth layering of two tracks, creating a complex rhythmic texture before the swap.

About this hard techno set

SPFDJ with Clara Cuvé - 08 October 2019 is a hard techno DJ set by Clara Cuvé, running 2h 00m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 85/100 overall — festival ready.

The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

This mix demonstrates how to maintain extreme tension without losing the groove.

How the score breaks down

SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 93/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 81/100.

Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

Energy and structure

The energy curve was sampled at 35 points, moving between 70 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.

6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 784.4 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 20 ms.

How this score is built

Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

Listen to the original set

Full SOONOS analysis

This mix demonstrates how to maintain extreme tension without losing the groove.

The 8 dimensions

Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

Score breakdown

TECHNIQUE

How well did you execute?

25%85

Beat Alignmentmeasured81

Transition Qualitymeasured82

Phrase Accuracymeasured90

EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured85

Tempo Stability (estimated)measured93

Technical Cleanlinessmeasured80

STORYTELLING

Did the mix go somewhere?

25%90

Narrative ArcAI91

ProgressionAI91

Tension & ReleaseAI84

Section AwarenessAI89

Flow ContinuityAI92

PayoffAI93

ENERGY

Did you control the room?

20%84

Energy Curvemeasured82

PacingAI89

MomentumAI94

Peak ManagementAI89

Energy HandoffAI92

Fatigue ControlAI48

SURPRISE

Did you remain unpredictable?

15%81

Unexpected MomentsAI82

ContrastAI79

Transition Varietymeasured93

Selection RiskAI89

FreshnessAI48

Surprise ControlAI82

IDENTITY

Did the mix sound like you?

15%93

Selection QualityAI93

Identity ConsistencyAI98

IntentionalityAI94

ConfidenceAI96

RestraintAI82

SignatureAI94

Energy arc

12:00120:00