What score does Clara Cuvé's CLARA CUVÉ I UNREAL STAGE I Nibirii Festival get?

CLARA CUVÉ I UNREAL STAGE I Nibirii Festival scores 84/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.

How long is CLARA CUVÉ I UNREAL STAGE I Nibirii Festival?

The analysed recording runs 1h 58m.

Which part of the mix scores best?

IDENTITY is the strongest category at 91/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 79/100.

How is this score calculated?

SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

Clara Cuvé

Clara Cuvé — CLARA CUVÉ I UNREAL STAGE I Nibirii Festival

Hard Techno · 1h 58m · analysed 22 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

Overall score

84/100

Level

club ready

Duration

1h 58m

Genre

Hard Techno

Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Clara Cuvé.

In short

CLARA CUVÉ I UNREAL STAGE I Nibirii Festival by Clara Cuvé scores 84/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (91/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (79/100).

Clara Cuvé demonstrates elite control over industrial textures, proving that high-BPM techno can be both relentless and technically sophisticated.

Key takeaways

What weakened the set

Recurring mid-frequency clash (2×) — Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 2× (18:15, 22:30).
Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 4:00, 32:00, 47:00, 54:00, 71:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

What to try next

Introduce more dynamic range by occasionally stripping back to just a kick and a single atmospheric element.
Experiment with polyrhythmic percussion layers to add complexity to the groove.
Use more dramatic filter sweeps during transitions to emphasize the movement between tracks.
Introduce a final, high-impact melodic element to create a definitive climax before the resolution.

Timestamped insights

Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

6:45Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 6:45
Strategic disruption
13:42Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 13:42
Aggressive but perfectly timed transition that maintains the driving momentum.
18:15Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 18:15
Excellent use of layering to create a new rhythmic composite before the full switch.
22:30Measured (DSP)78/100Listen at 22:30
A very fast transition that slightly jars the mid-range but fits the aggressive style.
26:12Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 26:12
Aggressive but precise transition that maintains the percussive drive.

About this hard techno set

CLARA CUVÉ I UNREAL STAGE I Nibirii Festival is a hard techno DJ set by Clara Cuvé, running 1h 58m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 84/100 overall — club ready.

The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

Clara Cuvé demonstrates elite control over industrial textures, proving that high-BPM techno can be both relentless and technically sophisticated.

How the score breaks down

SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 91/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 79/100.

Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

Energy and structure

The energy curve was sampled at 47 points, moving between 70 and 98 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.

7 transitions were detected and scored individually.

Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 688.1 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 4 ms.

How this score is built

Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

Listen to the original set

Full SOONOS analysis

Clara Cuvé demonstrates elite control over industrial textures, proving that high-BPM techno can be both relentless and technically sophisticated.

The 8 dimensions

Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

Score breakdown

TECHNIQUE

How well did you execute?

25%84

Beat Alignmentmeasured98

Transition Qualitymeasured57

Phrase Accuracymeasured90

EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured84

Tempo Stability (estimated)measured94

Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

STORYTELLING

Did the mix go somewhere?

25%90

Narrative ArcAI91

ProgressionAI88

Tension & ReleaseAI88

Section AwarenessAI88

Flow ContinuityAI92

PayoffAI95

ENERGY

Did you control the room?

20%83

Energy Curvemeasured84

PacingAI86

MomentumAI95

Peak ManagementAI91

Energy HandoffAI92

Fatigue ControlAI33

SURPRISE

Did you remain unpredictable?

15%79

Unexpected MomentsAI81

ContrastAI78

Transition Varietymeasured93

Selection RiskAI86

FreshnessAI33

Surprise ControlAI81

IDENTITY

Did the mix sound like you?

15%91

Selection QualityAI92

Identity ConsistencyAI98

IntentionalityAI93

ConfidenceAI95

RestraintAI76

SignatureAI91

Energy arc

0:00117:57