Cid Inc — Cid Inc @ Lost & Found Boat Party Budapest (November 2015)
Progressive · 1h 06m · analysed 22 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com
Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Cid Inc.
In short
Cid Inc @ Lost & Found Boat Party Budapest (November 2015) by Cid Inc scores 84/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (93/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (80/100).
Cid Inc proves that the space between tracks is just as important as the tracks themselves.
Key takeaways
What worked
- EQ blending
- Pacing
- Selection
- Technical precision
What weakened the set
- Long static loops (5×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (33:00, 44:00, 52:00, 55:00, 60:45). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What to try next
- Continue to leverage long-form blends to maintain the hypnotic state.
- Consider introducing a 'signature' melodic break around the 20-minute mark to provide a narrative peak.
- Maintain the excellent gain staging observed in this segment.
- Experiment with wider stereo imaging on melodic layers to increase the sense of immersion.
Timestamped insights
Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.
Perfectly executed transition where the incoming track's groove takes over seamlessly.
Smooth introduction of melodic elements while maintaining the low-end drive.
Masterful handover of the low-end. The new track emerges from the atmosphere of the first.
About this progressive set
Cid Inc @ Lost & Found Boat Party Budapest (November 2015) is a progressive DJ set by Cid Inc, running 1h 06m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 84/100 overall — club ready.
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
Cid Inc proves that the space between tracks is just as important as the tracks themselves.
How the score breaks down
SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 93/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 80/100.
Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.
Energy and structure
The energy curve was sampled at 23 points, moving between 40 and 88 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.
6 transitions were detected and scored individually.
Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 52.9 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 15 ms.
How this score is built
Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.
Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.
Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.
Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.
Full SOONOS analysis
Cid Inc proves that the space between tracks is just as important as the tracks themselves.
The 8 dimensions
Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.
Score breakdown
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
25%90
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
25%89
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
20%84
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
15%80
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
15%93
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
Energy arc
Transitions analysed (6)
Long EQ blend with low-end swap
Perfectly executed transition where the incoming track's groove takes over seamlessly.
Harmonic blend with high-pass filtering
Smooth introduction of melodic elements while maintaining the low-end drive.
Invisible Blend
Harmonic Masterstroke
Minor EQ Overlap
Long EQ blend (64+ bars)
Masterful handover of the low-end. The new track emerges from the atmosphere of the first.
Technical subscores
91
EQ balance
95
Beat alignment
89
Energy control
95
Tempo stability
89
Loudness control
93
Musical coherence
93
Harmonic compatibility
93
Transition cleanliness
Measured (DSP)
15 ms
Beat-grid drift (median)
Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.
41 ms
Drift p95
Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.
3,951
Boundaries detected
Points where the audio changes track or section.
14
Hard cuts / h
Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.
15
Clipping events
Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.
74
Level jumps
Sudden volume steps between tracks.
Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.
Recurring patterns
Long static loops (5×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (33:00, 44:00, 52:00, 55:00, 60:45). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What SOONOS heard
- EQ blending
- Pacing
- Selection
- Technical precision
- Narrative flow
- Atmospheric depth
Timeline
- 0:00Atmospheric Foundation
- 5:45Seamless Groove Shift
Coaching notes
- Continue to leverage long-form blends to maintain the hypnotic state.
- Consider introducing a 'signature' melodic break around the 20-minute mark to provide a narrative peak.
- Maintain the excellent gain staging observed in this segment.
- Experiment with wider stereo imaging on melodic layers to increase the sense of immersion.
- Use subtle delay throws on percussion during breakdowns to add rhythmic interest.
- Maintain the current level of EQ restraint; it is what gives the mix its professional polish.
Curious how your own set scores?
Methodology and limitations
This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.
Read the full SOONOS methodology →Questions about this analysis
- What score does Cid Inc's Cid Inc @ Lost & Found Boat Party Budapest (November 2015) get?
- Cid Inc @ Lost & Found Boat Party Budapest (November 2015) scores 84/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
- How long is Cid Inc @ Lost & Found Boat Party Budapest (November 2015)?
- The analysed recording runs 1h 06m.
- Which part of the mix scores best?
- IDENTITY is the strongest category at 93/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 80/100.
- How is this score calculated?
- SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.
More Cid Inc sets analysed
Similar progressive sets
- Jeremy Olander — Vivrant Radio 016 | Jeremy Olander | Reconstruction of Jeremy Olander presents Vivrant86
- Jeremy Olander — Vivrant Radio 034 | Jeremy Olander86
- Jeremy Olander — Jeremy Olander Live at Pioneer DJsounds, London, UK 2014-11-1486
- Jeremy Olander — Mau5trap presents... Jeremy Olander Guest Mix | 2016-07-2986
- Jeremy Olander — EPIC Radio 009 - Pryda Friends Special with Jeremy Olander & Fehrplay86
- Jeremy Olander — John Digweed presents Transitions 666 with Jeremy Olander86
- Jeremy Olander — Jeremy Olander | Diplo's Revolution | Sirius XM | GuestRoomMix86
- John Digweed — John Digweed - Monumento Nacional a la Bandera, Rosario, Argentina Jan 30th 202687
Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.
Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.
Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research