Cid Inc — Cid Inc @ Womb Tokyo

    Progressive · 1h 43m · analysed 22 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    84/100
    Level
    club ready
    Duration
    1h 43m
    Genre
    Progressive

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Cid Inc.

    In short

    Cid Inc @ Womb Tokyo by Cid Inc scores 84/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (91/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (81/100).

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (19:00, 25:30, 31:00, 34:00, 41:30, 46:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Introduce a brief melodic or vocal hook every 15-20 minutes to provide a mental anchor for the listener.
    • Experiment with slightly more aggressive EQ cuts during transitions to create more dynamic 'moments'.
    • Use the master compressor's release time to add a bit more 'pump' to the rolling basslines.
    • Continue to trust the long-form blend; it is your strongest technical asset.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 05:42Measured (DSP)94/100Listen at 05:42

      Invisible transition. The incoming bassline is introduced so gradually it feels like a natural progression of the first track.

    • 10:15Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 10:15

      Beautifully executed harmonic blend. The melodies of both tracks complement each other without clashing.

    • 12:45Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 12:45

      Perfectly executed bass handover, maintaining the rolling momentum.

    • 16:45Measured (DSP)95/100Listen at 16:45

      A masterclass in progressive mixing; the two tracks become one new entity.

    • 23:45Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 23:45

      Perfectly executed handover; the energy remains constant throughout the 2-minute blend.

    • 29:40Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 29:40

      Smooth introduction of the next track's top-end, creating a natural lift in energy.

    About this progressive set

    Cid Inc @ Womb Tokyo is a progressive DJ set by Cid Inc, running 1h 43m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 84/100 overall — club ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 91/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 81/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 49 points, moving between 35 and 89 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 143.2 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 14 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%90
    Beat Alignmentmeasured89
    Transition Qualitymeasured90
    Phrase Accuracymeasured94
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured89
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured96
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured80

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%88
    Narrative ArcAI92
    ProgressionAI89
    Tension & ReleaseAI84
    Section AwarenessAI89
    Flow ContinuityAI93
    PayoffAI80

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%84
    Energy Curvemeasured82
    PacingAI91
    MomentumAI90
    Peak ManagementAI85
    Energy HandoffAI87
    Fatigue ControlAI55

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%81
    Unexpected MomentsAI81
    ContrastAI83
    Transition Varietymeasured91
    Selection RiskAI80
    FreshnessAI55
    Surprise ControlAI81

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%91
    Selection QualityAI88
    Identity ConsistencyAI96
    IntentionalityAI92
    ConfidenceAI92
    RestraintAI90
    SignatureAI89

    Energy arc

    00:00102:30

    Transitions analysed (6)

    05:42

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Invisible transition. The incoming bassline is introduced so gradually it feels like a natural progression of the first track.

    94
    10:15

    Melodic layering and filter fade

    Beautifully executed harmonic blend. The melodies of both tracks complement each other without clashing.

    92
    12:45

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Perfectly executed bass handover, maintaining the rolling momentum.

    92
    16:45

    Sophisticated multi-band layering

    A masterclass in progressive mixing; the two tracks become one new entity.

    95
    23:45

    Long EQ blend with low-end crossover

    Perfectly executed handover; the energy remains constant throughout the 2-minute blend.

    92
    29:40

    Subtle high-pass filter transition

    Smooth introduction of the next track's top-end, creating a natural lift in energy.

    88

    Technical subscores

    89

    EQ balance

    95

    Beat alignment

    88

    Energy control

    96

    Tempo stability

    87

    Loudness control

    90

    Musical coherence

    91

    Harmonic compatibility

    92

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    14 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    45 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    6,133

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    21

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    29

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    92

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (19:00, 25:30, 31:00, 34:00, 41:30, 46:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 00:45Atmospheric Hook
    • 07:22Melodic Introduction
    • 15:20Atmospheric Shift
    • 20:45Tension Peak
    • 26:30Groove Lock

    Coaching notes

    • Introduce a brief melodic or vocal hook every 15-20 minutes to provide a mental anchor for the listener.
    • Experiment with slightly more aggressive EQ cuts during transitions to create more dynamic 'moments'.
    • Use the master compressor's release time to add a bit more 'pump' to the rolling basslines.
    • Continue to trust the long-form blend; it is your strongest technical asset.
    • Maintain the current level of low-end management; the sub-bass clarity is excellent.
    • Consider introducing a very subtle, high-frequency rhythmic element to add a touch of 'sparkle' to the dark atmosphere.
    • Maintain the current level of EQ precision; it is your strongest technical asset.
    • Experiment with slightly more aggressive filter resonance to add texture to transitions.
    • Consider a 'reset' moment with 4-8 bars of near-silence to amplify the impact of the next groove entry.
    • Experiment with wider stereo imaging for transition FX.
    • Consider a brief 'silence' moment to reset the crowd's ears before the final peak.
    • Maintain this level of EQ discipline; it is world-class.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Cid Inc's Cid Inc @ Womb Tokyo get?
    Cid Inc @ Womb Tokyo scores 84/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Cid Inc @ Womb Tokyo?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 43m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 91/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 81/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Cid Inc sets analysed

    Similar progressive sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Cid Inc analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.