Chris Lake — Chris Lake San Francisco 2025 | Full Set

    Tech House · 1h 60m · analysed 20 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    85/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    1h 60m
    Genre
    Tech House

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Chris Lake.

    In short

    Chris Lake San Francisco 2025 | Full Set by Chris Lake scores 85/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (92/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (83/100).

    This DJ understands that in tech-house, the space between the beats is as important as the beats themselves.

    Key takeaways

    What worked

    • Elite groove continuity
    • Flawless technical execution
    • Strong track selection
    • Exceptional energy management and peak-time selection.

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (24:00, 28:00, 36:00, 42:30, 48:00, 56:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Experiment with longer, more atmospheric transitions to add depth.
    • Use subtle melodic elements to create a more complex emotional arc.
    • Vary the intensity of the kick drum to create more dynamic movement.
    • Experiment with more aggressive high-pass filtering on the outgoing track to create even sharper drops.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 13:12Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 13:12

      Perfectly executed swap of the kick and sub-bass, maintaining the energy without any phase cancellation.

    • 18:05Measured (DSP)84/100Listen at 18:05

      Effective use of high-pass filtering to create a brief tension moment before dropping the next track.

    • 22:20Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 22:20

      Smooth integration of the incoming track's percussion, creating a hybrid groove for several bars.

    • 26:12Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 26:12

      Perfectly executed tech-house transition, maintaining the groove while introducing new percussive elements.

    About this tech house set

    Chris Lake San Francisco 2025 | Full Set is a tech house DJ set by Chris Lake, running 1h 60m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 85/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    This DJ understands that in tech-house, the space between the beats is as important as the beats themselves.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 92/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 83/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 49 points, moving between 40 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    7 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 932.9 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 22 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    This DJ understands that in tech-house, the space between the beats is as important as the beats themselves.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%83
    Beat Alignmentmeasured78
    Transition Qualitymeasured68
    Phrase Accuracymeasured93
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured88
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured97
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured74

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%89
    Narrative ArcAI90
    ProgressionAI88
    Tension & ReleaseAI86
    Section AwarenessAI89
    Flow ContinuityAI92
    PayoffAI92

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%87
    Energy Curvemeasured83
    PacingAI89
    MomentumAI94
    Peak ManagementAI89
    Energy HandoffAI88
    Fatigue ControlAI71

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%83
    Unexpected MomentsAI81
    ContrastAI81
    Transition Varietymeasured92
    Selection RiskAI84
    FreshnessAI69
    Surprise ControlAI81

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%92
    Selection QualityAI91
    Identity ConsistencyAI97
    IntentionalityAI93
    ConfidenceAI95
    RestraintAI84
    SignatureAI91

    Energy arc

    24:00118:00

    Transitions analysed (7)

    3:45

    Perfect Blend

    100
    8:00

    Seamless Handover

    100
    12:00

    Minor EQ Overlap

    82
    13:12

    Long EQ blend with low-end handover

    Perfectly executed swap of the kick and sub-bass, maintaining the energy without any phase cancellation.

    92
    18:05

    Filter sweep and loop-out

    Effective use of high-pass filtering to create a brief tension moment before dropping the next track.

    84
    22:20

    32-bar blend with mid-range focus

    Smooth integration of the incoming track's percussion, creating a hybrid groove for several bars.

    88
    26:12

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Perfectly executed tech-house transition, maintaining the groove while introducing new percussive elements.

    92

    Technical subscores

    88

    EQ balance

    95

    Beat alignment

    90

    Energy control

    97

    Tempo stability

    89

    Loudness control

    90

    Musical coherence

    87

    Harmonic compatibility

    90

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    22 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    237 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    7,167

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    90

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    0

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    349

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (24:00, 28:00, 36:00, 42:30, 48:00, 56:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What SOONOS heard

    • Elite groove continuity
    • Flawless technical execution
    • Strong track selection
    • Exceptional energy management and peak-time selection.
    • Flawless technical execution and phrase alignment.
    • Strong crowd-engagement through recognizable vocal stabs.
    • Exceptional crowd engagement and energy management.
    • Flawless phrasing and narrative pacing.
    • Strong artistic identity and confidence.

    Timeline

    • 15:30Groove Lock Peak
    • 20:45Tension Plateau
    • 28:30Groove Lock Peak

    Coaching notes

    • Experiment with longer, more atmospheric transitions to add depth.
    • Use subtle melodic elements to create a more complex emotional arc.
    • Vary the intensity of the kick drum to create more dynamic movement.
    • Experiment with more aggressive high-pass filtering on the outgoing track to create even sharper drops.
    • Incorporate more atmospheric FX layers during the final breakdown to enhance the emotional depth.
    • Practice micro-adjustments on the mid-EQ during vocal overlaps to avoid any frequency masking.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Chris Lake's Chris Lake San Francisco 2025 | Full Set get?
    Chris Lake San Francisco 2025 | Full Set scores 85/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Chris Lake San Francisco 2025 | Full Set?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 60m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 92/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 83/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Chris Lake sets analysed

    Similar tech house sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Chris Lake analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.