Charlotte de Witte — Charlotte de Witte at KNTXT Sportpaleis (November 2019)
Hard Techno · 1h 31m · analysed 18 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com
Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Charlotte de Witte.
In short
Charlotte de Witte at KNTXT Sportpaleis (November 2019) by Charlotte de Witte scores 86/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (94/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (82/100).
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
Key takeaways
What weakened the set
- Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (8:00, 29:30, 34:00, 43:15, 63:00, 79:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
Timestamped insights
Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.
Flawless transition from intro atmosphere into the first driving track.
Smooth introduction of new percussive layers over the existing groove.
Perfectly executed transition; the incoming kick takes over the sub-frequencies without any phase cancellation.
High-energy moment where both tracks hit a peak simultaneously, creating a massive wall of sound.
Smooth transition during a melodic break, allowing the new lead to emerge naturally.
Seamless integration of the incoming kick, maintaining the driving energy perfectly.
Uses the breakdown of Track A to introduce the atmospheric elements of Track B before a unified drop.
About this hard techno set
Charlotte de Witte at KNTXT Sportpaleis (November 2019) is a hard techno DJ set by Charlotte de Witte, running 1h 31m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 86/100 overall — festival ready.
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
How the score breaks down
SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 94/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 82/100.
Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.
Energy and structure
The energy curve was sampled at 38 points, moving between 30 and 96 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.
7 transitions were detected and scored individually.
Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 1129.8 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 20 ms.
How this score is built
Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.
Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.
Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.
Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.
Full SOONOS analysis
The 8 dimensions
Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.
Score breakdown
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
25%85
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
25%91
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
20%88
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
15%82
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
15%94
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
Energy arc
Transitions analysed (7)
EQ-based low-end swap
Flawless transition from intro atmosphere into the first driving track.
High-pass filter blend
Smooth introduction of new percussive layers over the existing groove.
Long EQ blend with low-end swap
Perfectly executed transition; the incoming kick takes over the sub-frequencies without any phase cancellation.
Double-drop layering
High-energy moment where both tracks hit a peak simultaneously, creating a massive wall of sound.
Mid-frequency swap during breakdown
Smooth transition during a melodic break, allowing the new lead to emerge naturally.
Long percussive blend with high-pass filter swap
Seamless integration of the incoming kick, maintaining the driving energy perfectly.
Breakdown transition into a drop swap
Uses the breakdown of Track A to introduce the atmospheric elements of Track B before a unified drop.
Technical subscores
91
EQ balance
95
Beat alignment
94
Energy control
98
Tempo stability
92
Loudness control
91
Musical coherence
86
Harmonic compatibility
92
Transition cleanliness
Measured (DSP)
20 ms
Beat-grid drift (median)
Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.
203 ms
Drift p95
Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.
5,434
Boundaries detected
Points where the audio changes track or section.
111
Hard cuts / h
Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.
47
Clipping events
Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.
207
Level jumps
Sudden volume steps between tracks.
Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.
Recurring patterns
Long static loops (6×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (8:00, 29:30, 34:00, 43:15, 63:00, 79:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
Timeline
- 0:05Cinematic Hook
- 2:30The First Drop
- 13:45Groove Lock
- 17:20Tension Peak
- 22:05Vocal Hook Entry
- 28:45Tension Peak
- 28:05Risky pressure or vibe dip
Curious how your own set scores?
Methodology and limitations
This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.
Read the full SOONOS methodology →Questions about this analysis
- What score does Charlotte de Witte's Charlotte de Witte at KNTXT Sportpaleis (November 2019) get?
- Charlotte de Witte at KNTXT Sportpaleis (November 2019) scores 86/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
- How long is Charlotte de Witte at KNTXT Sportpaleis (November 2019)?
- The analysed recording runs 1h 31m.
- Which part of the mix scores best?
- IDENTITY is the strongest category at 94/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 82/100.
- How is this score calculated?
- SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.
More Charlotte de Witte sets analysed
- Charlotte de Witte - Live @ Kappa FuturFestival 202589
- Charlotte de Witte - Tomorrowland (Closing Main Stage 2022)88
- Charlotte de Witte - Tomorrowland Brasil (Closing Main Stage 2024)88
- Charlotte de Witte at Tomorrowland (Closing Main Stage 2025)87
- Charlotte de Witte at Tomorrowland (Daybreak Session 2025)87
- Charlotte de Witte at AMF Festival 202387
- Charlotte de Witte - Awakenings Festival 202586
Similar hard techno sets
- Kobosil — Kobosil | Exhale Together Live Stream 202186
- Kobosil — Kobosil | Unpolished 2019 | Warehouse Elementenstraat, Amsterdam86
- Kasia — Kasia Live at @Tommorowland for @Afterlife 202486
- Sara Landry — SARA LANDRY (LIVE SET) @ DEF: THE BOILER86
- Sara Landry — Sara Landry @ Respira Festival 2026 (Santiago, Chile)86
- Kobosil — Kobosil | Synoid 2020 | Revier Südost, Berlin86
- Sara Landry — Sara Landry - Live @ By the Creek 202686
- Anetha — Anetha | Peacock Society 2022 - ARTE Concert86
Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.
Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.
Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research