Charlotte de Witte — Charlotte de Witte at AMF Festival 2023
Hard Techno · 58 min · analysed 18 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com
Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Charlotte de Witte.
In short
Charlotte de Witte at AMF Festival 2023 by Charlotte de Witte scores 87/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (94/100) and the weakest is TECHNIQUE (85/100).
This mix is a testament to the power of uncompromising, driving techno in a festival setting.
Key takeaways
What worked
- Exceptional energy management.
- Technical precision in mixing.
- Strong artistic identity.
- Technical precision
What weakened the set
- Long static loops (4×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (17:00, 29:00, 35:00, 39:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What to try next
- Introduce a brief atmospheric breakdown to provide a moment of contrast.
- Experiment with more syncopated percussion layers to add rhythmic depth.
- Utilize high-pass filter sweeps more aggressively during builds for added tension.
Timestamped insights
Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.
Seamless transition maintaining the driving energy.
High-impact transition that energizes the crowd.
Intentional reset
About this hard techno set
Charlotte de Witte at AMF Festival 2023 is a hard techno DJ set by Charlotte de Witte, running 58 min. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 87/100 overall — festival ready.
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
This mix is a testament to the power of uncompromising, driving techno in a festival setting.
How the score breaks down
SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 94/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 85/100.
Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.
Energy and structure
The energy curve was sampled at 21 points, moving between 75 and 96 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.
7 transitions were detected and scored individually.
Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 636.7 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 6 ms.
How this score is built
Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.
Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.
Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.
Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.
Full SOONOS analysis
This mix is a testament to the power of uncompromising, driving techno in a festival setting.
The 8 dimensions
Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.
Score breakdown
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
25%85
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
25%93
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
20%91
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
15%88
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
15%94
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
Energy arc
Transitions analysed (7)
Perfect Blend
Minor EQ Overlap
Seamless Phrase Swap
Long EQ blend with low-end swap.
Seamless transition maintaining the driving energy.
Quick cut on the drop.
High-impact transition that energizes the crowd.
Perfect Blend
Minor EQ Overlap
intentional_reset
Technical subscores
89
EQ balance
94
Beat alignment
93
Energy control
97
Tempo stability
93
Loudness control
91
Musical coherence
86
Harmonic compatibility
90
Transition cleanliness
Measured (DSP)
6 ms
Beat-grid drift (median)
Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.
181 ms
Drift p95
Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.
3,433
Boundaries detected
Points where the audio changes track or section.
159
Hard cuts / h
Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.
0
Clipping events
Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.
178
Level jumps
Sudden volume steps between tracks.
Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.
Recurring patterns
Long static loops (4×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (17:00, 29:00, 35:00, 39:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What SOONOS heard
- Exceptional energy management.
- Technical precision in mixing.
- Strong artistic identity.
- Technical precision
- Energy maintenance
- Stylistic consistency
Timeline
- 18:20Masterful Buildup
- 21:10Rhythmic Peak
- 27:08Energy Surge
Coaching notes
- Introduce a brief atmospheric breakdown to provide a moment of contrast.
- Experiment with more syncopated percussion layers to add rhythmic depth.
- Utilize high-pass filter sweeps more aggressively during builds for added tension.
Curious how your own set scores?
Methodology and limitations
This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.
Read the full SOONOS methodology →Questions about this analysis
- What score does Charlotte de Witte's Charlotte de Witte at AMF Festival 2023 get?
- Charlotte de Witte at AMF Festival 2023 scores 87/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
- How long is Charlotte de Witte at AMF Festival 2023?
- The analysed recording runs 58 min.
- Which part of the mix scores best?
- IDENTITY is the strongest category at 94/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 85/100.
- How is this score calculated?
- SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.
More Charlotte de Witte sets analysed
- Charlotte de Witte - Live @ Kappa FuturFestival 202589
- Charlotte de Witte - Tomorrowland Brasil (Closing Main Stage 2024)88
- Charlotte de Witte - Tomorrowland (Closing Main Stage 2022)88
- Charlotte de Witte at Tomorrowland (Daybreak Session 2025)87
- Charlotte de Witte at Tomorrowland (Closing Main Stage 2025)87
- Charlotte de Witte - Awakenings Festival 202586
- Charlotte de Witte at KNTXT Sportpaleis (November 2019)86
Similar hard techno sets
- Rebekah — Rebekah @ReForm Festival LA 2/4/2387
- Paula Temple — Paula Temple - Resident Advisor Podcast 46487
- 999999999 — 999999999 | RE/FORM Festival87
- Lilly Palmer — Lilly Palmer - Essential Mix 2022-05-2887
- Indira Paganotto — INDIRA PAGANOTTO : BBC Radio 1 Essential Mix87
- Paula Temple — Paula Temple at Awakenings Festival 201787
- Klangkuenstler — klangkuenstler @ HÖR (Impuls - 18 June '21)87
- Dax J — DAX J @ 909 Festival 2026 Closing Set87
Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.
Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.
Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research