Boris Brejcha — Christmas Mix 2025 (Mixed by Ginger)

    High Tech Minimal · 54 min · analysed 19 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    67/100
    Level
    developing
    Duration
    54 min
    Genre
    High Tech Minimal

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Boris Brejcha.

    In short

    Christmas Mix 2025 (Mixed by Ginger) by Boris Brejcha scores 67/100 in the SOONOS analysis (developing). The strongest dimension is TECHNIQUE (79/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (64/100).

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (4×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (7:30, 17:00, 44:00, 48:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 3:45Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 3:45

      Smooth transition with a well-timed bass swap on the phrase boundary.

    • 7:15Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 7:15

      Effective use of filtering to bring in the new track's hats before the drop.

    • 11:45Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 11:45

      Smooth introduction of the incoming bassline while slowly rolling off the outgoing highs.

    • 15:20Measured (DSP)78/100Listen at 15:20

      Effective swap of the melodic elements on the phrase change.

    • 19:55Measured (DSP)65/100Listen at 19:55

      A slightly abrupt transition that causes a minor dip in momentum.

    About this high tech minimal set

    Christmas Mix 2025 (Mixed by Ginger) is a high tech minimal DJ set by Boris Brejcha, running 54 min. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 67/100 overall — developing.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is TECHNIQUE at 79/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 64/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 18 points, moving between 60 and 85 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.

    7 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 213.7 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 27 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%79
    Beat Alignmentmeasured68
    Transition Qualitymeasured81
    Phrase Accuracymeasured82
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured78
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured89
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured77

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%70
    Narrative ArcAI73
    ProgressionAI66
    Tension & ReleaseAI63
    Section AwarenessAI71
    Flow ContinuityAI80
    PayoffAI73

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%67
    Energy Curvemeasured60
    PacingAI67
    MomentumAI82
    Peak ManagementAI67
    Energy HandoffAI73
    Fatigue ControlAI49

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%64
    Unexpected MomentsAI59
    ContrastAI67
    Transition Varietymeasured80
    Selection RiskAI60
    FreshnessAI47
    Surprise ControlAI59

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%72
    Selection QualityAI68
    Identity ConsistencyAI90
    IntentionalityAI71
    ConfidenceAI76
    RestraintAI62
    SignatureAI58

    Energy arc

    0:0054:00

    Transitions analysed (7)

    3:45

    32-bar EQ blend

    Smooth transition with a well-timed bass swap on the phrase boundary.

    88
    7:15

    Long blend with high-pass filtering

    Effective use of filtering to bring in the new track's hats before the drop.

    85
    11:45

    Long EQ blend

    Smooth introduction of the incoming bassline while slowly rolling off the outgoing highs.

    85
    15:20

    Mid-range swap

    Effective swap of the melodic elements on the phrase change.

    78
    19:55

    Quick cut on drop

    A slightly abrupt transition that causes a minor dip in momentum.

    65
    24:15

    Perfect Blend

    100
    28:00

    Minor EQ Overlap

    82

    Technical subscores

    78

    EQ balance

    87

    Beat alignment

    76

    Energy control

    89

    Tempo stability

    81

    Loudness control

    78

    Musical coherence

    76

    Harmonic compatibility

    82

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    27 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    124 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    3,253

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    75

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    4

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    102

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (4×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (7:30, 17:00, 44:00, 48:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 2:15Energy Plateau
    • 9:45Strong Groove Lock
    • 14:10Groove Lock
    • 20:05Energy Sag
    • 19:55Risky pressure or vibe dip
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Boris Brejcha's Christmas Mix 2025 (Mixed by Ginger) get?
    Christmas Mix 2025 (Mixed by Ginger) scores 67/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (developing), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Christmas Mix 2025 (Mixed by Ginger)?
    The analysed recording runs 54 min.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    TECHNIQUE is the strongest category at 79/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 64/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Boris Brejcha sets analysed

    Similar high tech minimal sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Boris Brejcha analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Loading…