Bell Towers — In-Store 006 - BELL TOWERS

    Indie House · 1h 03m · analysed 21 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    73/100
    Level
    solid
    Duration
    1h 03m
    Genre
    Indie House

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Bell Towers.

    In short

    In-Store 006 - BELL TOWERS by Bell Towers scores 73/100 in the SOONOS analysis (solid). The strongest dimension is TECHNIQUE (85/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (71/100).

    The DJ's strength lies in their ability to weave disparate sounds into a single, compelling story.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Recurring mid-frequency clash (2×) — Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 2× (4:22, 26:20).
    • Long static loops (5×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (15:00, 28:30, 31:00, 34:15, 46:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Refine gain matching to avoid noticeable level jumps during transitions.
    • Experiment with more creative EQ work to further blend the eclectic track choices.
    • Continue to lean into the unique, narrative-driven selection that defines your style.
    • Use more aggressive high-pass filtering during transitions to create 'air' before the next track drops.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 4:22Measured (DSP)65/100Listen at 4:22

      A slightly noticeable jump in volume as the new track takes over.

    • 8:35Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 8:35

      Smooth handover of percussive elements, maintaining energy.

    • 10:45Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 10:45

      Perfectly executed handover of the low end.

    • 14:20Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 14:20

      Vocal elements from the incoming track sit perfectly in the mix.

    • 21:45Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 21:45

      Seamless integration of new drum patterns.

    • 26:20Measured (DSP)78/100Listen at 26:20

      Smooth handover of the low-end frequencies.

    About this indie house set

    In-Store 006 - BELL TOWERS is a indie house DJ set by Bell Towers, running 1h 03m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 73/100 overall — solid.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    The DJ's strength lies in their ability to weave disparate sounds into a single, compelling story.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is TECHNIQUE at 85/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 71/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 33 points, moving between 20 and 78 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 541.0 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 15 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The DJ's strength lies in their ability to weave disparate sounds into a single, compelling story.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%85
    Beat Alignmentmeasured89
    Transition Qualitymeasured87
    Phrase Accuracymeasured86
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured79
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured88
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured74

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%76
    Narrative ArcAI82
    ProgressionAI74
    Tension & ReleaseAI70
    Section AwarenessAI78
    Flow ContinuityAI83
    PayoffAI71

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%75
    Energy Curvemeasured75
    PacingAI78
    MomentumAI82
    Peak ManagementAI71
    Energy HandoffAI74
    Fatigue ControlAI59

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%71
    Unexpected MomentsAI69
    ContrastAI70
    Transition Varietymeasured84
    Selection RiskAI70
    FreshnessAI59
    Surprise ControlAI69

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%82
    Selection QualityAI82
    Identity ConsistencyAI89
    IntentionalityAI79
    ConfidenceAI77
    RestraintAI83
    SignatureAI77

    Energy arc

    0:0062:30

    Transitions analysed (6)

    4:22

    EQ blend with level jump

    A slightly noticeable jump in volume as the new track takes over.

    65
    8:35

    Long EQ blend

    Smooth handover of percussive elements, maintaining energy.

    85
    10:45

    Long EQ blend

    Perfectly executed handover of the low end.

    92
    14:20

    Phrased vocal blend

    Vocal elements from the incoming track sit perfectly in the mix.

    85
    21:45

    Long percussive blend

    Seamless integration of new drum patterns.

    88
    26:20

    EQ-based transition

    Smooth handover of the low-end frequencies.

    78

    Technical subscores

    79

    EQ balance

    87

    Beat alignment

    78

    Energy control

    88

    Tempo stability

    78

    Loudness control

    80

    Musical coherence

    82

    Harmonic compatibility

    82

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    15 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    156 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    3,734

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    23

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    13

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    708

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Recurring mid-frequency clash

      Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 2× (4:22, 26:20).

    • Long static loops (5×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (15:00, 28:30, 31:00, 34:15, 46:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 1:15Atmospheric Hook
    • 4:22Level Jump
    • 13:45Groove Lock
    • 19:15Energy Plateau
    • 24:30Groove Lock
    • 29:15Vocal Entry

    Coaching notes

    • Refine gain matching to avoid noticeable level jumps during transitions.
    • Experiment with more creative EQ work to further blend the eclectic track choices.
    • Continue to lean into the unique, narrative-driven selection that defines your style.
    • Use more aggressive high-pass filtering during transitions to create 'air' before the next track drops.
    • Experiment with layering acapellas to add a unique signature to the vocal sections.
    • Vary the transition lengths; while long blends work well, a few shorter 'cuts' could add needed surprise.
    • Use subtle delay or reverb throws on vocal tails to smooth out transitions.
    • Experiment with 'teasing' the incoming track's melody earlier in the blend.
    • Vary the transition lengths to keep the listener guessing.
    • Focus on high-frequency EQ management to ensure the mix stays crisp during dense layers.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Bell Towers's In-Store 006 - BELL TOWERS get?
    In-Store 006 - BELL TOWERS scores 73/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (solid), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is In-Store 006 - BELL TOWERS?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 03m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    TECHNIQUE is the strongest category at 85/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 71/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Bell Towers sets analysed

    Similar indie house sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Bell Towers analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Loading…