Bell Towers — B.P.T. Hi-NRG Radio 009: Bell Towers

    Indie House · 1h 24m · analysed 21 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    73/100
    Level
    solid
    Duration
    1h 24m
    Genre
    Indie House

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Bell Towers.

    In short

    B.P.T. Hi-NRG Radio 009: Bell Towers by Bell Towers scores 73/100 in the SOONOS analysis (solid). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (82/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (72/100).

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Recurring mid-frequency clash (2×) — Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 2× (9:12, 23:08).
    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 9:30, 14:00, 18:00, 28:00, 34:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Use high-pass filters to thin out the mix before a new track's kick enters.
    • Experiment with shorter, more aggressive cuts to contrast the long blends.
    • Introduce a 'hero' melodic element at the 15-minute mark to anchor the first chapter.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 4:48Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 4:48

      Smooth transition that maintains the percussive momentum while introducing a new bass texture.

    • 9:12Measured (DSP)76/100Listen at 9:12

      Effective use of EQ to layer melodic elements before fully committing to the next track.

    • 12:34Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 12:34

      A very smooth transition where the incoming track's percussion is introduced subtly over the outgoing vocal.

    • 17:22Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 17:22

      Clean handover of the low end. The energy remains constant, and the phrasing is spot on.

    • 23:08Measured (DSP)75/100Listen at 23:08

      A slightly abrupt change in energy. While technically in sync, the sudden loss of the previous track's atmosphere is noticeable.

    • 26:30Measured (DSP)90/100Listen at 26:30

      Perfectly executed transition with seamless integration of the incoming track's percussion.

    About this indie house set

    B.P.T. Hi-NRG Radio 009: Bell Towers is a indie house DJ set by Bell Towers, running 1h 24m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 73/100 overall — solid.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 82/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 72/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 31 points, moving between 55 and 88 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.

    6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 747.1 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 22 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%82
    Beat Alignmentmeasured79
    Transition Qualitymeasured84
    Phrase Accuracymeasured85
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured78
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured89
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured75

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%78
    Narrative ArcAI81
    ProgressionAI78
    Tension & ReleaseAI73
    Section AwarenessAI78
    Flow ContinuityAI84
    PayoffAI76

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%76
    Energy Curvemeasured73
    PacingAI78
    MomentumAI85
    Peak ManagementAI75
    Energy HandoffAI77
    Fatigue ControlAI63

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%72
    Unexpected MomentsAI71
    ContrastAI69
    Transition Varietymeasured83
    Selection RiskAI72
    FreshnessAI60
    Surprise ControlAI71

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%82
    Selection QualityAI84
    Identity ConsistencyAI90
    IntentionalityAI81
    ConfidenceAI81
    RestraintAI74
    SignatureAI82

    Energy arc

    0:0083:00

    Transitions analysed (6)

    4:48

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Smooth transition that maintains the percussive momentum while introducing a new bass texture.

    82
    9:12

    Mid-range focused blend

    Effective use of EQ to layer melodic elements before fully committing to the next track.

    76
    12:34

    Long EQ blend with high-pass filtering

    A very smooth transition where the incoming track's percussion is introduced subtly over the outgoing vocal.

    92
    17:22

    Bass swap on the phrase boundary

    Clean handover of the low end. The energy remains constant, and the phrasing is spot on.

    88
    23:08

    Quick cut during a breakdown

    A slightly abrupt change in energy. While technically in sync, the sudden loss of the previous track's atmosphere is noticeable.

    75
    26:30

    Long EQ blend

    Perfectly executed transition with seamless integration of the incoming track's percussion.

    90

    Technical subscores

    78

    EQ balance

    87

    Beat alignment

    78

    Energy control

    89

    Tempo stability

    80

    Loudness control

    83

    Musical coherence

    79

    Harmonic compatibility

    81

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    22 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    197 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    5,017

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    13

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    60

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    666

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Recurring mid-frequency clash

      Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 2× (9:12, 23:08).

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 9:30, 14:00, 18:00, 28:00, 34:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 5:32Vocal Hook Entry
    • 10:45Energy Plateau
    • 14:50Groove Lock
    • 23:08Energy Sag
    • 26:30Seamless Blend

    Coaching notes

    • Use high-pass filters to thin out the mix before a new track's kick enters.
    • Experiment with shorter, more aggressive cuts to contrast the long blends.
    • Introduce a 'hero' melodic element at the 15-minute mark to anchor the first chapter.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Bell Towers's B.P.T. Hi-NRG Radio 009: Bell Towers get?
    B.P.T. Hi-NRG Radio 009: Bell Towers scores 73/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (solid), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is B.P.T. Hi-NRG Radio 009: Bell Towers?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 24m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 82/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 72/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Bell Towers sets analysed

    Similar indie house sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Bell Towers analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.