Bassnectar — Bassnectar - Immersive Music Mixtape - Side Two

    MID Tempo Bass · 51 min · analysed 20 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    87/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    51 min
    Genre
    MID Tempo Bass

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Bassnectar.

    In short

    Bassnectar - Immersive Music Mixtape - Side Two by Bassnectar scores 87/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (95/100) and the weakest is TECHNIQUE (84/100).

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (1×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (41:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 6:20Measured (DSP)100/100Listen at 6:20

      Intentional reset

    • 10:45Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 10:45

      Smooth transition into a more percussive section, using FX to bridge the energy gap.

    • 14:15Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 14:15

      Precise low-end handover that maintains the groove without any audible dip in pressure.

    • 28:30Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 28:30

      Strategic disruption

    About this mid tempo bass set

    Bassnectar - Immersive Music Mixtape - Side Two is a mid tempo bass DJ set by Bassnectar, running 51 min. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 87/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 95/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 84/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 15 points, moving between 40 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    8 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 785.8 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 23 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%84
    Beat Alignmentmeasured78
    Transition Qualitymeasured67
    Phrase Accuracymeasured94
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured89
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured95
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%92
    Narrative ArcAI94
    ProgressionAI91
    Tension & ReleaseAI92
    Section AwarenessAI92
    Flow ContinuityAI92
    PayoffAI93

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%87
    Energy Curvemeasured90
    PacingAI92
    MomentumAI92
    Peak ManagementAI93
    Energy HandoffAI93
    Fatigue ControlAI47

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%87
    Unexpected MomentsAI88
    ContrastAI92
    Transition Varietymeasured94
    Selection RiskAI92
    FreshnessAI49
    Surprise ControlAI88

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%95
    Selection QualityAI95
    Identity ConsistencyAI97
    IntentionalityAI96
    ConfidenceAI96
    RestraintAI90
    SignatureAI96

    Energy arc

    10:0050:00

    Transitions analysed (8)

    2:45

    Perfect Blend

    100
    6:20

    Strategic Drop-Swap

    intentional_reset

    100
    8:45

    Minor EQ Overlap

    82
    10:45

    High-pass filter sweep with vocal echo

    Smooth transition into a more percussive section, using FX to bridge the energy gap.

    92
    14:15

    EQ-based stem swap

    Precise low-end handover that maintains the groove without any audible dip in pressure.

    88
    20:45

    Perfect Stem Layering

    100
    24:40

    Peak Energy Handoff

    100
    28:30

    Minor Level Jump

    strategic_disruption

    82

    Technical subscores

    89

    EQ balance

    96

    Beat alignment

    92

    Energy control

    95

    Tempo stability

    91

    Loudness control

    90

    Musical coherence

    91

    Harmonic compatibility

    92

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    23 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    200 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    3,034

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    106

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    1338

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    280

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 99% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (1×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (41:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 15:45Peak Energy Drop
    • 18:20Vocal Layering Mastery
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Bassnectar's Bassnectar - Immersive Music Mixtape - Side Two get?
    Bassnectar - Immersive Music Mixtape - Side Two scores 87/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Bassnectar - Immersive Music Mixtape - Side Two?
    The analysed recording runs 51 min.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 95/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 84/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Bassnectar sets analysed

    Similar mid tempo bass sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Bassnectar analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.