Argy — ARGY X @ Second Speed x Lost Minds 12.07.26
Melodic Techno · 1h 01m · analysed 21 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com
Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Argy.
In short
ARGY X @ Second Speed x Lost Minds 12.07.26 by Argy scores 81/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is TECHNIQUE (87/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (75/100).
The DJ's confidence in track selection and energy handoffs suggests a high level of experience in large-scale environments.
Key takeaways
What weakened the set
- Recurring mid-frequency clash (2×) — Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 2× (7:18, 25:42).
- Repeated volume jumps (2×) — Gain-staging mismatches break perceived continuity and force the crowd to readjust. Detected 2× (7:18, 25:42).
- Long static loops (5×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (17:30, 20:00, 26:00, 37:00, 41:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What to try next
- Fine-tune gain matching during quick transitions to avoid level jumps.
- Introduce more atmospheric or melodic breaks to create contrast.
- Experiment with longer, more complex layering to add depth to the groove.
- Refine EQ management during long blends to avoid mid-range frequency clashing.
Timestamped insights
Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.
Smooth transition into the first main groove, well-phrased.
Effective energy handoff, maintaining momentum.
Slight level jump, but energy remains high.
Seamless transition, excellent control of sub-frequencies.
Smooth low handover on the downbeat, no flam, energy preserved.
Effective use of filtering to build tension before a powerful drop.
Smooth transition that maintains the driving energy without any audible clashing.
A slightly abrupt transition that works for the festival context but feels a bit rushed.
About this melodic techno set
ARGY X @ Second Speed x Lost Minds 12.07.26 is a melodic techno DJ set by Argy, running 1h 01m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 81/100 overall — club ready.
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
The DJ's confidence in track selection and energy handoffs suggests a high level of experience in large-scale environments.
How the score breaks down
SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is TECHNIQUE at 87/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 75/100.
Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.
Energy and structure
The energy curve was sampled at 31 points, moving between 40 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.
8 transitions were detected and scored individually.
Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 677.0 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 6 ms.
How this score is built
Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.
Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.
Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.
Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.
Full SOONOS analysis
The DJ's confidence in track selection and energy handoffs suggests a high level of experience in large-scale environments.
The 8 dimensions
Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.
Score breakdown
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
25%87
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
25%86
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
20%81
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
15%75
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
15%84
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
Energy arc
Transitions analysed (8)
EQ blend with high-pass filter
Smooth transition into the first main groove, well-phrased.
Drop swap on phrase
Effective energy handoff, maintaining momentum.
Quick EQ swap
Slight level jump, but energy remains high.
Long blend with low-end handover
Seamless transition, excellent control of sub-frequencies.
32-bar EQ blend, low swap on phrase
Smooth low handover on the downbeat, no flam, energy preserved.
High-pass filter sweep into a drop
Effective use of filtering to build tension before a powerful drop.
16-bar EQ blend, low swap on phrase
Smooth transition that maintains the driving energy without any audible clashing.
Quick cut-in after a short build
A slightly abrupt transition that works for the festival context but feels a bit rushed.
Technical subscores
80
EQ balance
88
Beat alignment
87
Energy control
91
Tempo stability
82
Loudness control
82
Musical coherence
81
Harmonic compatibility
83
Transition cleanliness
Measured (DSP)
6 ms
Beat-grid drift (median)
Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.
181 ms
Drift p95
Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.
3,654
Boundaries detected
Points where the audio changes track or section.
49
Hard cuts / h
Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.
68
Clipping events
Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.
91
Level jumps
Sudden volume steps between tracks.
Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.
Recurring patterns
Recurring mid-frequency clash
Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 2× (7:18, 25:42).
Repeated volume jumps
Gain-staging mismatches break perceived continuity and force the crowd to readjust. Detected 2× (7:18, 25:42).
Long static loops (5×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (17:30, 20:00, 26:00, 37:00, 41:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
Timeline
- 0:45Intro Impact
- 4:30Energy Peak
- 7:20Minor Level Jump
- 7:18Risky pressure or vibe dip
- 11:15High-Energy Entry
- 18:10Peak Energy Drop
- 25:40Peak Energy Drop
- 28:48Minor Vibe Wobble
- 25:42Risky pressure or vibe dip
Coaching notes
- Fine-tune gain matching during quick transitions to avoid level jumps.
- Introduce more atmospheric or melodic breaks to create contrast.
- Experiment with longer, more complex layering to add depth to the groove.
- Refine EQ management during long blends to avoid mid-range frequency clashing.
- Experiment with more dramatic pressure drops to create greater contrast.
- Incorporate more unexpected elements to further distinguish your artistic identity.
- Explore longer tension-building sequences for even more impactful drops.
Curious how your own set scores?
Methodology and limitations
This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.
Read the full SOONOS methodology →Questions about this analysis
- What score does Argy's ARGY X @ Second Speed x Lost Minds 12.07.26 get?
- ARGY X @ Second Speed x Lost Minds 12.07.26 scores 81/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
- How long is ARGY X @ Second Speed x Lost Minds 12.07.26?
- The analysed recording runs 1h 01m.
- Which part of the mix scores best?
- TECHNIQUE is the strongest category at 87/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 75/100.
- How is this score calculated?
- SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.
More Argy sets analysed
Similar melodic techno sets
- Innellea — Innellea Live at EDC Las Vegas 202681
- WhoMadeWho — WhoMadeWho WorldWide [Episode 003]81
- WhoMadeWho — WhoMadeWho WorldWide [Episode 005]81
- Patrice Bäumel — HALO at Shelter Amsterdam | December 8th, 202381
- WhoMadeWho — Whomadewho DJ Team: Afterlife, Space Ibiza81
- WhoMadeWho — WhoMadeWho WorldWide [Episode 002]81
- Adriatique — Adriatique X Tulum 2026 Replicated Set82
- Pole Folder — Pole Folder-Brussels 11.10.2014-Part 282
Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.
Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.
Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research