Anetha — Club Quarantäne II - Anetha

    Hard Techno · 1h 34m · analysed 21 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    85/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    1h 34m
    Genre
    Hard Techno

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Anetha.

    In short

    Club Quarantäne II - Anetha by Anetha scores 85/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (93/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (82/100).

    Anetha's mixing is less about track changes and more about the continuous engineering of a sonic engine.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 32:00, 35:00, 39:00, 43:00, 47:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Introduce a brief atmospheric breakdown to reset the listener's ears before the final peak.
    • Monitor high-frequency layering to avoid occasional harshness during dense transitions.
    • Experiment with subtle melodic motifs to add a layer of emotional depth to the industrial grit.
    • Experiment with 64-bar blends to further blur track boundaries.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 03:45Measured (DSP)90/100Listen at 03:45

      Perfectly timed swap, maintaining the industrial drive.

    • 09:20Measured (DSP)78/100Listen at 09:20

      Brief muddiness in the mids, but the energy remains high.

    • 17:05Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 17:05

      Strategic disruption

    • 25:08Measured (DSP)95/100Listen at 25:08

      Surgical precision in the bass handover. The groove never wavers.

    • 27:22Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 27:22

      Smooth introduction of a new synth texture while maintaining the percussive core.

    • 30:15Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 30:15

      High-impact transition that significantly raises the energy level.

    About this hard techno set

    Club Quarantäne II - Anetha is a hard techno DJ set by Anetha, running 1h 34m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 85/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Anetha's mixing is less about track changes and more about the continuous engineering of a sonic engine.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 93/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 82/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 46 points, moving between 75 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.

    8 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 963.9 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 20 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    Anetha's mixing is less about track changes and more about the continuous engineering of a sonic engine.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%83
    Beat Alignmentmeasured82
    Transition Qualitymeasured66
    Phrase Accuracymeasured91
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured86
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured94
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%90
    Narrative ArcAI92
    ProgressionAI91
    Tension & ReleaseAI85
    Section AwarenessAI90
    Flow ContinuityAI94
    PayoffAI91

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%85
    Energy Curvemeasured81
    PacingAI89
    MomentumAI95
    Peak ManagementAI90
    Energy HandoffAI92
    Fatigue ControlAI56

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%82
    Unexpected MomentsAI82
    ContrastAI79
    Transition Varietymeasured93
    Selection RiskAI87
    FreshnessAI60
    Surprise ControlAI82

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%93
    Selection QualityAI92
    Identity ConsistencyAI98
    IntentionalityAI95
    ConfidenceAI96
    RestraintAI82
    SignatureAI94

    Energy arc

    00:0094:00

    Transitions analysed (8)

    03:45

    Fast EQ swap on the 1st beat

    Perfectly timed swap, maintaining the industrial drive.

    90
    09:20

    Layered blend with mid-frequency overlap

    Brief muddiness in the mids, but the energy remains high.

    78
    13:30

    Perfect Blend

    100
    17:05

    Minor EQ Overlap

    strategic_disruption

    82
    21:20

    Elite Layering

    100
    25:08

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Surgical precision in the bass handover. The groove never wavers.

    95
    27:22

    Mid-frequency layering

    Smooth introduction of a new synth texture while maintaining the percussive core.

    88
    30:15

    Double-drop on phrase

    High-impact transition that significantly raises the energy level.

    92

    Technical subscores

    86

    EQ balance

    92

    Beat alignment

    91

    Energy control

    94

    Tempo stability

    87

    Loudness control

    90

    Musical coherence

    81

    Harmonic compatibility

    85

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    20 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    182 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    5,637

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    116

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    30

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    327

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 32:00, 35:00, 39:00, 43:00, 47:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 00:45Industrial Foundation
    • 06:30Density Peak
    • 09:20Risky pressure or vibe dip
    • 26:45Groove Lock
    • 30:15Risky pressure or vibe dip

    Coaching notes

    • Introduce a brief atmospheric breakdown to reset the listener's ears before the final peak.
    • Monitor high-frequency layering to avoid occasional harshness during dense transitions.
    • Experiment with subtle melodic motifs to add a layer of emotional depth to the industrial grit.
    • Experiment with 64-bar blends to further blur track boundaries.
    • Use subtle reverb washes on the high-end to create more space.
    • Introduce a non-rhythmic element (vocal snippet or field recording) for narrative depth.
    • Experiment with longer, 64-bar blends to further enhance the hypnotic effect.
    • Use more extreme high-pass filtering during buildups to increase the impact of the drops.
    • Incorporate a few 'classic' Detroit techno stabs to add a touch of historical depth to the selection.
    • Experiment with more dramatic filter sweeps to create momentary tension releases.
    • Fine-tune mid-range EQ cuts during transitions to avoid spectral clutter.
    • Consider introducing a brief melodic motif in the final track for emotional payoff.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Anetha's Club Quarantäne II - Anetha get?
    Club Quarantäne II - Anetha scores 85/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Club Quarantäne II - Anetha?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 34m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 93/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 82/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Anetha sets analysed

    Similar hard techno sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Anetha analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Loading…