Anetha — Anetha | Peacock Society 2022 - ARTE Concert
Hard Techno · 1h 59m · analysed 21 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com
Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Anetha.
In short
Anetha | Peacock Society 2022 - ARTE Concert by Anetha scores 86/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (94/100) and the weakest is TECHNIQUE (82/100).
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
Key takeaways
What weakened the set
- Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 33:20, 36:00, 40:45, 47:00, 52:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What to try next
- Experiment with longer, more atmospheric breakdowns to heighten the impact of the drops.
- Incorporate more varied synth textures to expand the emotional range of the set.
- Maintain the current level of technical precision in high-BPM transitions.
- Experiment with brief moments of silence to enhance the impact of the kick re-entry.
Timestamped insights
Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.
Perfectly executed transition that maintains the driving energy while shifting the textural focus.
Energetic transition that uses frequency isolation to bring in the next track's lead elements.
Strategic disruption
Perfectly executed handover of the sub-bass frequencies, maintaining the rolling groove.
Smooth introduction of a vocal element that sits perfectly above the existing kick.
About this hard techno set
Anetha | Peacock Society 2022 - ARTE Concert is a hard techno DJ set by Anetha, running 1h 59m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 86/100 overall — festival ready.
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
How the score breaks down
SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 94/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 82/100.
Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.
Energy and structure
The energy curve was sampled at 43 points, moving between 75 and 96 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.
7 transitions were detected and scored individually.
Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 202.1 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 20 ms.
How this score is built
Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.
Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.
Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.
Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.
Full SOONOS analysis
The 8 dimensions
Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.
Score breakdown
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
25%82
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
25%92
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
20%87
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
15%85
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
15%94
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
Energy arc
Transitions analysed (7)
Long EQ blend with low-end swap
Perfectly executed transition that maintains the driving energy while shifting the textural focus.
Fast layering with high-pass filter
Energetic transition that uses frequency isolation to bring in the next track's lead elements.
Perfect EQ Swap
Minor High-End Overlap
strategic_disruption
Seamless Phrase Match
Long EQ blend with low-end swap
Perfectly executed handover of the sub-bass frequencies, maintaining the rolling groove.
Mid-frequency layering and cut
Smooth introduction of a vocal element that sits perfectly above the existing kick.
Technical subscores
88
EQ balance
94
Beat alignment
93
Energy control
95
Tempo stability
90
Loudness control
90
Musical coherence
85
Harmonic compatibility
89
Transition cleanliness
Measured (DSP)
20 ms
Beat-grid drift (median)
Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.
81 ms
Drift p95
Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.
7,092
Boundaries detected
Points where the audio changes track or section.
184
Hard cuts / h
Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.
11
Clipping events
Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.
384
Level jumps
Sudden volume steps between tracks.
Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.
Recurring patterns
Long static loops (6×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 33:20, 36:00, 40:45, 47:00, 52:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
Timeline
- 04:30Acid Entry
- 09:15Rhythmic Density Peak
- 27:30Groove Lock
Coaching notes
- Experiment with longer, more atmospheric breakdowns to heighten the impact of the drops.
- Incorporate more varied synth textures to expand the emotional range of the set.
- Maintain the current level of technical precision in high-BPM transitions.
- Experiment with brief moments of silence to enhance the impact of the kick re-entry.
- Explore more minor-key melodic elements to add emotional depth to the industrial sound.
- Maintain the high level of technical precision shown in the EQ blends.
Curious how your own set scores?
Methodology and limitations
This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.
Read the full SOONOS methodology →Questions about this analysis
- What score does Anetha's Anetha | Peacock Society 2022 - ARTE Concert get?
- Anetha | Peacock Society 2022 - ARTE Concert scores 86/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
- How long is Anetha | Peacock Society 2022 - ARTE Concert?
- The analysed recording runs 1h 59m.
- Which part of the mix scores best?
- IDENTITY is the strongest category at 94/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 82/100.
- How is this score calculated?
- SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.
More Anetha sets analysed
Similar hard techno sets
- Charlotte de Witte — Charlotte de Witte - Awakenings Festival 202586
- Kobosil — Kobosil | Exhale Together Live Stream 202186
- Charlotte de Witte — Charlotte de Witte at KNTXT Sportpaleis (November 2019)86
- Sara Landry — SARA LANDRY (LIVE SET) @ DEF: THE BOILER86
- Sara Landry — Sara Landry @ Respira Festival 2026 (Santiago, Chile)86
- Kasia — Kasia Live at @Tommorowland for @Afterlife 202486
- Sara Landry — Sara Landry - Live @ By the Creek 202686
- Kobosil — Kobosil | Synoid 2020 | Revier Südost, Berlin86
Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.
Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.
Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research