Aly & Fila — Future Sound of Egypt 559 with Aly & Fila (Live from Tomorrowland 2018)

    Trance · 1h 60m · Tomorrowland · analysed 05 Sept 2026 · source: mixcloud.com

    Overall score
    89/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    1h 60m
    Genre
    Trance

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on mixcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Aly & Fila.

    In short

    Future Sound of Egypt 559 with Aly & Fila (Live from Tomorrowland 2018) by Aly & Fila scores 89/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (94/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (85/100).

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (4:00, 10:00, 19:00, 22:30, 36:00, 44:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Maintain the high technical standard throughout the set.
    • Use the cinematic elements to create 'chapters' in the narrative.
    • Ensure the low-end remains clean during complex melodic layering.
    • Continue to refine the use of atmospheric elements in breakdowns.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 2:15Measured (DSP)92/100

      Perfectly timed transition from the spoken intro into the first track's groove.

    • 06:52Measured (DSP)92/100

      Perfectly timed transition that maintains the driving energy while introducing the next melodic theme.

    • 09:45Measured (DSP)88/100

      High-impact transition using the breakdown to reset energy before a massive melodic payoff.

    • 13:32Measured (DSP)96/100

      Perfectly executed transition where the incoming melody complements the outgoing track's pads.

    • 18:04Measured (DSP)92/100

      High-impact transition that uses a breakdown to switch tracks, maximizing festival energy.

    • 22:10Measured (DSP)92/100

      Flawless transition that maintains energy while shifting melodic focus.

    • 30:15Measured (DSP)82/100

      Intentional reset

    About this trance set

    Future Sound of Egypt 559 with Aly & Fila (Live from Tomorrowland 2018) is a trance DJ set by Aly & Fila, running 1h 60m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 89/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 94/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 85/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 68 points, moving between 40 and 96 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    8 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 1208.6 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 18 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%88
    Beat Alignmentmeasured84
    Transition Qualitymeasured83
    Phrase Accuracymeasured95
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured88
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured97
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured73

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%94
    Narrative ArcAI95
    ProgressionAI92
    Tension & ReleaseAI92
    Section AwarenessAI93
    Flow ContinuityAI93
    PayoffAI97

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%91
    Energy Curvemeasured96
    PacingAI92
    MomentumAI95
    Peak ManagementAI93
    Energy HandoffAI92
    Fatigue ControlAI59

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%85
    Unexpected MomentsAI83
    ContrastAI88
    Transition Varietymeasured95
    Selection RiskAI91
    FreshnessAI59
    Surprise ControlAI83

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%94
    Selection QualityAI94
    Identity ConsistencyAI98
    IntentionalityAI95
    ConfidenceAI96
    RestraintAI86
    SignatureAI96

    Energy arc

    0:00107:00

    Transitions analysed (8)

    2:15

    Atmospheric crossfade into driving kick

    Perfectly timed transition from the spoken intro into the first track's groove.

    92
    06:52

    Long melodic blend with low-end swap

    Perfectly timed transition that maintains the driving energy while introducing the next melodic theme.

    92
    09:45

    Breakdown transition into drop

    High-impact transition using the breakdown to reset energy before a massive melodic payoff.

    88
    13:32

    Long harmonic EQ blend

    Perfectly executed transition where the incoming melody complements the outgoing track's pads.

    96
    18:04

    Drop swap after breakdown

    High-impact transition that uses a breakdown to switch tracks, maximizing festival energy.

    92
    22:10

    Long melodic blend with precise EQ handover

    Flawless transition that maintains energy while shifting melodic focus.

    92
    26:12

    Perfect Harmonic Blend

    100
    30:15

    Minor Level Jump

    intentional_reset

    82

    Technical subscores

    88

    EQ balance

    94

    Beat alignment

    92

    Energy control

    97

    Tempo stability

    87

    Loudness control

    93

    Musical coherence

    95

    Harmonic compatibility

    90

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    18 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    202 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    7,156

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    37

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    271

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    153

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (4:00, 10:00, 19:00, 22:30, 36:00, 44:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 0:00Cinematic Intro
    • 2:18First Drop
    • 4:45Percussive Layering
    • 07:45Melodic Peak
    • 10:30Energy Plateau
    • 15:45Emotional Peak
    • 17:12Tension Masterclass
    • 22:45Euphoric Peak

    Coaching notes

    • Maintain the high technical standard throughout the set.
    • Use the cinematic elements to create 'chapters' in the narrative.
    • Ensure the low-end remains clean during complex melodic layering.
    • Continue to refine the use of atmospheric elements in breakdowns.
    • Experiment with subtle rhythmic variations to add more texture.
    • Maintain the high level of technical precision and energy management.
    • Experiment with even longer melodic transitions to further enhance the storytelling aspect.
    • Use subtle filter automation during the driving sections to add more movement to the percussion.
    • Ensure the transition out of the peak drop maintains the momentum without feeling abrupt.
    Listen on Mixcloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Aly & Fila's Future Sound of Egypt 559 with Aly & Fila (Live from Tomorrowland 2018) get?
    Future Sound of Egypt 559 with Aly & Fila (Live from Tomorrowland 2018) scores 89/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Future Sound of Egypt 559 with Aly & Fila (Live from Tomorrowland 2018)?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 60m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 94/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 85/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Aly & Fila sets analysed

    Similar trance sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Aly & Fila analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Loading…