1788-L — Mid-Tempo (REZZ/Deathpact/1788-L)
MID Tempo Bass · 50 min · analysed 21 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com
Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, 1788-L.
In short
Mid-Tempo (REZZ/Deathpact/1788-L) by 1788-L scores 80/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is TECHNIQUE (84/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (76/100).
The DJ's command of the low-end is the foundation of this mix's success.
Key takeaways
What weakened the set
- Long static loops (3×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (10:00, 16:00, 47:15). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What to try next
- Introduce more melodic variation to add emotional depth.
- Experiment with longer, more complex transitions to showcase technical range.
- Vary the energy levels more significantly to create a more dynamic arc.
- Vary the length of builds to increase surprise.
Timestamped insights
Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.
Smooth transition into a heavier bassline, maintaining momentum.
Expertly executed layering of two complex bass tracks without frequency masking.
Perfectly timed bass handover, maintaining the rolling pressure.
High-impact transition that resets the energy for the next track.
Slightly abrupt transition, but fits the aggressive style.
Smooth transition with well-managed bass frequencies.
Effective use of filtering to bridge two high-energy segments.
About this mid tempo bass set
Mid-Tempo (REZZ/Deathpact/1788-L) is a mid tempo bass DJ set by 1788-L, running 50 min. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 80/100 overall — club ready.
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
The DJ's command of the low-end is the foundation of this mix's success.
How the score breaks down
SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is TECHNIQUE at 84/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 76/100.
Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.
Energy and structure
The energy curve was sampled at 18 points, moving between 40 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.
7 transitions were detected and scored individually.
Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 1088.5 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 20 ms.
How this score is built
Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.
Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.
Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.
Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.
Full SOONOS analysis
The DJ's command of the low-end is the foundation of this mix's success.
The 8 dimensions
Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.
Score breakdown
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
25%84
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
25%83
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
20%78
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
15%76
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
15%84
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
Energy arc
Transitions analysed (7)
EQ-balanced blend on phrase
Smooth transition into a heavier bassline, maintaining momentum.
Double-drop layering
Expertly executed layering of two complex bass tracks without frequency masking.
EQ blend with low-end swap
Perfectly timed bass handover, maintaining the rolling pressure.
Drop swap
High-impact transition that resets the energy for the next track.
Quick cut
Slightly abrupt transition, but fits the aggressive style.
EQ blend with low-end swap
Smooth transition with well-managed bass frequencies.
Filter sweep and percussive layering
Effective use of filtering to bridge two high-energy segments.
Technical subscores
85
EQ balance
91
Beat alignment
85
Energy control
91
Tempo stability
84
Loudness control
86
Musical coherence
85
Harmonic compatibility
88
Transition cleanliness
Measured (DSP)
20 ms
Beat-grid drift (median)
Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.
187 ms
Drift p95
Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.
3,004
Boundaries detected
Points where the audio changes track or section.
77
Hard cuts / h
Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.
28
Clipping events
Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.
173
Level jumps
Sudden volume steps between tracks.
Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.
Recurring patterns
Long static loops (3×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (10:00, 16:00, 47:15). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
Timeline
- 4:45Tension Peak
- 9:15Energy Plateau
- 14:10Atmospheric Breakdown
- 17:25Energy Plateau
- 18:30Risky pressure or vibe dip
- 23:30Atmospheric Reset
- 27:15Peak Energy Drop
Coaching notes
- Introduce more melodic variation to add emotional depth.
- Experiment with longer, more complex transitions to showcase technical range.
- Vary the energy levels more significantly to create a more dynamic arc.
- Vary the length of builds to increase surprise.
- Use more vocal stabs to create memorable crowd moments.
- Experiment with more creative transition effects like short loops or echo-outs.
- Ensure sub-bass clarity during complex layering.
Curious how your own set scores?
Methodology and limitations
This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.
Read the full SOONOS methodology →Questions about this analysis
- What score does 1788-L's Mid-Tempo (REZZ/Deathpact/1788-L) get?
- Mid-Tempo (REZZ/Deathpact/1788-L) scores 80/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
- How long is Mid-Tempo (REZZ/Deathpact/1788-L)?
- The analysed recording runs 50 min.
- Which part of the mix scores best?
- TECHNIQUE is the strongest category at 84/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 76/100.
- How is this score calculated?
- SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.
More 1788-L sets analysed
Similar mid tempo bass sets
- Mersiv — Mersiv 44.4 Radio Vol. 15 - HEYZ & SIPPY80
- Mersiv — MERSIV AFTERS LIVE SET80
- Mersiv — A Mersiv Moment Downtempo Mixtape81
- Mersiv — Mersiv - Morflo Records Night Vision Boulder Theater Full Set84
- Bassnectar — Bassnectar - Mesmerizing The Ultra [2005]84
- Mersiv — Shambhala 2019 Mix Series - Mersiv84
- Mersiv — Beat Retreat Downtempo Mix (Live from Morflo Twitch)74
- Bassnectar — DREAMTEMPO [1999]86
Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.
Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.
Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research