Spartaque — Supreme Podcast 304

    Peak Techno · 1h 06m · analysed 25 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    72/100
    Level
    solid
    Duration
    1h 06m
    Genre
    Peak Techno

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Spartaque.

    In short

    Supreme Podcast 304 by Spartaque scores 72/100 in the SOONOS analysis (solid). The strongest dimension is TECHNIQUE (83/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (68/100).

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (1:00, 9:00, 15:00, 19:00, 33:00, 42:15). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Experiment with more aggressive EQ cuts to create rhythmic interest during blends.
    • Use the final 5 minutes to showcase a more unique or personal track selection.
    • Vary the length of transitions to keep the listener guessing.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 3:12Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 3:12

      Smooth transition with excellent low-end management.

    • 7:45Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 7:45

      Perfectly executed transition that enhances the energy flow.

    • 11:45Measured (DSP)90/100Listen at 11:45

      Perfectly executed transition with seamless low-end handover.

    • 14:20Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 14:20

      Smooth transition focusing on rhythmic alignment and EQ balance.

    About this peak techno set

    Supreme Podcast 304 is a peak techno DJ set by Spartaque, running 1h 06m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 72/100 overall — solid.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is TECHNIQUE at 83/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 68/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 25 points, moving between 20 and 85 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 517.0 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 17 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%83
    Beat Alignmentmeasured85
    Transition Qualitymeasured69
    Phrase Accuracymeasured87
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured85
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured90
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%77
    Narrative ArcAI80
    ProgressionAI75
    Tension & ReleaseAI69
    Section AwarenessAI79
    Flow ContinuityAI84
    PayoffAI78

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%72
    Energy Curvemeasured68
    PacingAI73
    MomentumAI87
    Peak ManagementAI69
    Energy HandoffAI77
    Fatigue ControlAI46

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%68
    Unexpected MomentsAI68
    ContrastAI68
    Transition Varietymeasured85
    Selection RiskAI62
    FreshnessAI43
    Surprise ControlAI68

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%79
    Selection QualityAI76
    Identity ConsistencyAI90
    IntentionalityAI77
    ConfidenceAI84
    RestraintAI70
    SignatureAI68

    Energy arc

    0:0065:52

    Transitions analysed (6)

    3:12

    32-bar EQ blend

    Smooth transition with excellent low-end management.

    88
    7:45

    Long harmonic blend

    Perfectly executed transition that enhances the energy flow.

    92
    11:45

    Long EQ blend

    Perfectly executed transition with seamless low-end handover.

    90
    14:20

    Percussive layering

    Smooth transition focusing on rhythmic alignment and EQ balance.

    88
    24:15

    Perfect Blend

    100
    26:45

    Minor EQ Overlap

    82

    Technical subscores

    85

    EQ balance

    90

    Beat alignment

    81

    Energy control

    90

    Tempo stability

    83

    Loudness control

    83

    Musical coherence

    84

    Harmonic compatibility

    87

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    17 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    218 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    3,935

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    93

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    1781

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    164

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (1:00, 9:00, 15:00, 19:00, 33:00, 42:15). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 0:30Professional Intro
    • 5:45Energy Plateau
    • 13:10Energy Peak
    • 18:45Energy Plateau

    Coaching notes

    • Experiment with more aggressive EQ cuts to create rhythmic interest during blends.
    • Use the final 5 minutes to showcase a more unique or personal track selection.
    • Vary the length of transitions to keep the listener guessing.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Spartaque's Supreme Podcast 304 get?
    Supreme Podcast 304 scores 72/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (solid), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Supreme Podcast 304?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 06m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    TECHNIQUE is the strongest category at 83/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 68/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Spartaque sets analysed

    Similar peak techno sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Spartaque analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Loading…