Spartaque — Supreme Podcast 301
Peak Techno · 1h 02m · analysed 25 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com
Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Spartaque.
In short
Supreme Podcast 301 by Spartaque scores 76/100 in the SOONOS analysis (solid). The strongest dimension is TECHNIQUE (82/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (71/100).
Technical mastery is the floor; artistic identity is the ceiling.
Key takeaways
What weakened the set
- Long static loops (5×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 31:00, 39:00, 41:00, 47:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What to try next
- Experiment with more dramatic tension/release cycles.
- Incorporate more diverse melodic textures to enhance the emotional arc.
- Try layering three decks to create unique, live mashups.
- Use subtle FX (delays/reverbs) to add more depth to the transitions.
Timestamped insights
Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.
A textbook transition. The incoming track's bassline is introduced subtly, with a clean swap at the phrase boundary that maintains perfect momentum.
Smooth integration of melodic elements. The DJ uses filtering effectively to prevent frequency masking during the overlap.
Intentional artistic
Seamless integration of new percussive elements.
Clean handover of the sub-bass frequencies.
About this peak techno set
Supreme Podcast 301 is a peak techno DJ set by Spartaque, running 1h 02m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 76/100 overall — solid.
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
Technical mastery is the floor; artistic identity is the ceiling.
How the score breaks down
SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is TECHNIQUE at 82/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 71/100.
Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.
Energy and structure
The energy curve was sampled at 25 points, moving between 65 and 92 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.
7 transitions were detected and scored individually.
Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 560.1 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 17 ms.
How this score is built
Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.
Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.
Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.
Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.
Full SOONOS analysis
Technical mastery is the floor; artistic identity is the ceiling.
The 8 dimensions
Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.
Score breakdown
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
25%82
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
25%81
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
20%75
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
15%71
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
15%82
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
Energy arc
Transitions analysed (7)
32-bar EQ blend, low-end swap on phrase
A textbook transition. The incoming track's bassline is introduced subtly, with a clean swap at the phrase boundary that maintains perfect momentum.
Long melodic blend with high-pass filtering
Smooth integration of melodic elements. The DJ uses filtering effectively to prevent frequency masking during the overlap.
Perfect Blend
Minor EQ Overlap
intentional_artistic
Seamless Phasing
Long EQ blend
Seamless integration of new percussive elements.
Low-end swap
Clean handover of the sub-bass frequencies.
Technical subscores
86
EQ balance
91
Beat alignment
84
Energy control
92
Tempo stability
85
Loudness control
85
Musical coherence
83
Harmonic compatibility
88
Transition cleanliness
Measured (DSP)
17 ms
Beat-grid drift (median)
Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.
221 ms
Drift p95
Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.
3,716
Boundaries detected
Points where the audio changes track or section.
117
Hard cuts / h
Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.
1485
Clipping events
Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.
147
Level jumps
Sudden volume steps between tracks.
Measurement confidence 99% · analysed on the full audio.
Recurring patterns
Long static loops (5×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 31:00, 39:00, 41:00, 47:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
Timeline
- 0:45Energy Hook
- 5:30Groove Lock
- 27:30Groove Peak
Coaching notes
- Experiment with more dramatic tension/release cycles.
- Incorporate more diverse melodic textures to enhance the emotional arc.
- Try layering three decks to create unique, live mashups.
- Use subtle FX (delays/reverbs) to add more depth to the transitions.
- Use subtle EQ automation to create movement in static loops.
- Experiment with more diverse melodic elements to enhance the narrative.
- Hold breakdowns slightly longer to increase the impact of the drops.
- Incorporate occasional rhythmic breaks to reset the dancefloor's attention.
Curious how your own set scores?
Methodology and limitations
This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.
Read the full SOONOS methodology →Questions about this analysis
- What score does Spartaque's Supreme Podcast 301 get?
- Supreme Podcast 301 scores 76/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (solid), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
- How long is Supreme Podcast 301?
- The analysed recording runs 1h 02m.
- Which part of the mix scores best?
- TECHNIQUE is the strongest category at 82/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 71/100.
- How is this score calculated?
- SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.
More Spartaque sets analysed
Similar peak techno sets
- Enrico Sangiuliano — Enrico Sangiuliano - Closing Set @ BACK>>To Clubbing - Milan 2011-10-0776
- Pan-Pot — PAN-POT Tomorrowland 201477
- Spektre — Mutual Respekt 211 with Spektre74
- Deborah de Luca — Deborah De Luca live @ "LE VELE" di Scampia (Napoli) 9.07.202074
- Mark Reeve — Mark Reeve Studio Madness Mix78
- Enrico Sangiuliano — Enrico Sangiuliano at Awakenings ADE 201973
- Deborah de Luca — Deborah De Luca live set @ DIE KANTINE - Linz, Austria 18.06.201679
- Layton Giordani — Layton Giordani - Radio 1's Essential Mix 2026-05-23 with tracklist72
Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.
Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.
Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research