Spartaque — Revive Podcast [episode 002]

    Peak Techno · 1h 03m · analysed 25 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    72/100
    Level
    solid
    Duration
    1h 03m
    Genre
    Peak Techno

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Spartaque.

    In short

    Revive Podcast [episode 002] by Spartaque scores 72/100 in the SOONOS analysis (solid). The strongest dimension is TECHNIQUE (81/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (66/100).

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (1×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (38:30). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Experiment with more aggressive filter work during transitions to add character.
    • Incorporate tracks with more distinct melodic hooks to create memorable moments.
    • Try extending the layering periods even further to create unique 'third tracks' from the blends.
    • Use more dramatic filter sweeps during transitions.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 2:15Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 2:15

      Smooth transition of high-hat patterns, maintaining the driving energy.

    • 6:40Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 6:40

      Perfectly executed bass handover that enhances the groove's momentum.

    • 11:15Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 11:15

      Perfectly executed transition where the new track emerges naturally from the old one.

    • 15:40Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 15:40

      Smooth introduction of new melodic elements while maintaining the percussive drive.

    • 19:45Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 19:45

      Effective use of high-pass filtering to clear space for the incoming track's low end.

    • 21:15Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 21:15

      Perfectly matched percussive loops, almost indistinguishable handover.

    • 25:45Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 25:45

      Clean bass transition, though slightly predictable.

    About this peak techno set

    Revive Podcast [episode 002] is a peak techno DJ set by Spartaque, running 1h 03m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 72/100 overall — solid.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is TECHNIQUE at 81/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 66/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 28 points, moving between 65 and 90 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.

    7 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 528.7 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 13 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%81
    Beat Alignmentmeasured90
    Transition Qualitymeasured59
    Phrase Accuracymeasured85
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured82
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured91
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured80

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%76
    Narrative ArcAI80
    ProgressionAI75
    Tension & ReleaseAI68
    Section AwarenessAI77
    Flow ContinuityAI85
    PayoffAI77

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%71
    Energy Curvemeasured66
    PacingAI70
    MomentumAI86
    Peak ManagementAI71
    Energy HandoffAI78
    Fatigue ControlAI47

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%66
    Unexpected MomentsAI67
    ContrastAI63
    Transition Varietymeasured85
    Selection RiskAI59
    FreshnessAI43
    Surprise ControlAI67

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%78
    Selection QualityAI75
    Identity ConsistencyAI93
    IntentionalityAI78
    ConfidenceAI81
    RestraintAI65
    SignatureAI70

    Energy arc

    0:0062:50

    Transitions analysed (7)

    2:15

    EQ-based layering

    Smooth transition of high-hat patterns, maintaining the driving energy.

    85
    6:40

    Long blend with low-end swap

    Perfectly executed bass handover that enhances the groove's momentum.

    88
    11:15

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Perfectly executed transition where the new track emerges naturally from the old one.

    92
    15:40

    Mid-frequency layering

    Smooth introduction of new melodic elements while maintaining the percussive drive.

    85
    19:45

    Filter sweep and phrase swap

    Effective use of high-pass filtering to clear space for the incoming track's low end.

    88
    21:15

    Long EQ blend

    Perfectly matched percussive loops, almost indistinguishable handover.

    92
    25:45

    Low-end swap on phrase

    Clean bass transition, though slightly predictable.

    85

    Technical subscores

    82

    EQ balance

    89

    Beat alignment

    80

    Energy control

    91

    Tempo stability

    83

    Loudness control

    82

    Musical coherence

    78

    Harmonic compatibility

    85

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    13 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    199 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    3,753

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    142

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    2460

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    187

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (1×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (38:30). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 3:45Rhythmic Peak
    • 8:20Energy Plateau
    • 11:15Masterful Blend
    • 16:20Groove Lock
    • 27:30Industrial Lead Entry
    • 23:45Percussive Plateau

    Coaching notes

    • Experiment with more aggressive filter work during transitions to add character.
    • Incorporate tracks with more distinct melodic hooks to create memorable moments.
    • Try extending the layering periods even further to create unique 'third tracks' from the blends.
    • Use more dramatic filter sweeps during transitions.
    • Introduce melodic elements to provide emotional contrast.
    • Vary the length of transitions to keep the listener engaged.
    • Use more aggressive filter sweeps during transitions to add excitement.
    • Incorporate a 'hero' track with a memorable hook to anchor the peak.
    • Experiment with brief rhythmic silences to reset the listener's ear.
    • Ensure the final fade-out is more gradual to maintain the hypnotic tail.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Spartaque's Revive Podcast [episode 002] get?
    Revive Podcast [episode 002] scores 72/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (solid), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Revive Podcast [episode 002]?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 03m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    TECHNIQUE is the strongest category at 81/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 66/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Spartaque sets analysed

    Similar peak techno sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Spartaque analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.