Spartaque — Codex Techno Podcast 075 with Spartaque
Peak Techno · 1h 01m · analysed 25 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com
Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Spartaque.
In short
Codex Techno Podcast 075 with Spartaque by Spartaque scores 84/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (91/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (79/100).
Spartaque uses transitions as rhythmic injections, ensuring the energy never dips below a professional threshold.
Key takeaways
What weakened the set
- Long static loops (5×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (17:30, 28:00, 31:00, 39:00, 46:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What to try next
- Introduce more varied mid-range elements to prevent ear fatigue over long durations.
- Experiment with brief, unexpected rhythmic breaks to surprise the listener.
- Utilize more spatial FX (reverb/delay) to create a sense of depth in the industrial soundscape.
- Smooth out the mid-range entry of aggressive synth leads to maintain hypnosis.
Timestamped insights
Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.
Intentional reset
Perfectly executed transition that maintains the rolling energy.
High-impact transition that injects new energy into the mix.
Surgical transition, maintaining the percussive drive perfectly.
Smooth introduction of new elements, keeping the energy high.
About this peak techno set
Codex Techno Podcast 075 with Spartaque is a peak techno DJ set by Spartaque, running 1h 01m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 84/100 overall — club ready.
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
Spartaque uses transitions as rhythmic injections, ensuring the energy never dips below a professional threshold.
How the score breaks down
SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 91/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 79/100.
Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.
Energy and structure
The energy curve was sampled at 23 points, moving between 82 and 96 on the SOONOS energy scale — a narrow dynamic range across the set.
6 transitions were detected and scored individually.
Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 1290.3 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 4 ms.
How this score is built
Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.
Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.
Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.
Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.
Full SOONOS analysis
Spartaque uses transitions as rhythmic injections, ensuring the energy never dips below a professional threshold.
The 8 dimensions
Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.
Score breakdown
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
25%85
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
25%89
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
20%83
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
15%79
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
15%91
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
Energy arc
Transitions analysed (6)
Perfect Phrasing
Minor EQ Overlap
intentional_reset
Long EQ blend with low-end swap.
Perfectly executed transition that maintains the rolling energy.
Quick cut on the phrase.
High-impact transition that injects new energy into the mix.
Long EQ blend with low-end swap
Surgical transition, maintaining the percussive drive perfectly.
Percussive layering and filter sweep
Smooth introduction of new elements, keeping the energy high.
Technical subscores
89
EQ balance
93
Beat alignment
92
Energy control
96
Tempo stability
91
Loudness control
91
Musical coherence
83
Harmonic compatibility
89
Transition cleanliness
Measured (DSP)
4 ms
Beat-grid drift (median)
Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.
225 ms
Drift p95
Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.
3,667
Boundaries detected
Points where the audio changes track or section.
161
Hard cuts / h
Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.
1
Clipping events
Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.
212
Level jumps
Sudden volume steps between tracks.
Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.
Recurring patterns
Long static loops (5×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (17:30, 28:00, 31:00, 39:00, 46:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
Timeline
- 14:20Groove Lock
- 18:10Tension Peak
- 21:30Groove Lock
- 27:45Energy Peak
Coaching notes
- Introduce more varied mid-range elements to prevent ear fatigue over long durations.
- Experiment with brief, unexpected rhythmic breaks to surprise the listener.
- Utilize more spatial FX (reverb/delay) to create a sense of depth in the industrial soundscape.
- Smooth out the mid-range entry of aggressive synth leads to maintain hypnosis.
- Introduce a brief atmospheric breakdown to provide a 'reset' before the final peak.
- Experiment with slightly longer layering to create more complex percussive textures.
Curious how your own set scores?
Methodology and limitations
This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.
Read the full SOONOS methodology →Questions about this analysis
- What score does Spartaque's Codex Techno Podcast 075 with Spartaque get?
- Codex Techno Podcast 075 with Spartaque scores 84/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
- How long is Codex Techno Podcast 075 with Spartaque?
- The analysed recording runs 1h 01m.
- Which part of the mix scores best?
- IDENTITY is the strongest category at 91/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 79/100.
- How is this score calculated?
- SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.
More Spartaque sets analysed
Similar peak techno sets
- Joel Mull — MindTrip Podcast 043 - Joel Mull84
- Layton Giordani — Layton Giordani live from La Estacion, Argentina 04-06-2484
- Mark Reeve — Mark Reeve @ Open Beatz Festival 202484
- Joel Mull — Joel Mull@Ein Hertz für Techno Live recorded 12031184
- Pan-Pot — PAN-POT - KEEZY ZELT AT RHEINKIRMES84
- Pan-Pot — PAN-POT - OURS / Blaues Wasser Frankfurt 2026071884
- HI-LO — HI-LO 2022 YEARMIX85
- Cari Lekebusch — The Future Underground Show with Cari Lekebusch, Israel Toledo and Nick Bowman85
Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.
Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.
Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research