Skrillex — F*CK U SKRILLEX YOU THINK UR ANDY WARHOL BUT UR NOT!! <3

    EDM Festival · 46 min · analysed 18 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    75/100
    Level
    solid
    Duration
    46 min
    Genre
    EDM Festival

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Skrillex.

    In short

    F*CK U SKRILLEX YOU THINK UR ANDY WARHOL BUT UR NOT!! <3 by Skrillex scores 75/100 in the SOONOS analysis (solid). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (81/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (72/100).

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (1×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (31:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 2:12Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 2:12

      Effective use of silence to reset the energy before the main drop.

    • 5:28Measured (DSP)68/100Listen at 5:28

      The mid-range frequencies of both tracks fight for space for about 4 bars.

    • 13:12Measured (DSP)46/100Listen at 13:12

      Strategic disruption

    • 21:55Measured (DSP)28/100Listen at 21:55

      Subjective error

    • 24:15Measured (DSP)100/100Listen at 24:15

      Strategic disruption

    About this edm festival set

    F*CK U SKRILLEX YOU THINK UR ANDY WARHOL BUT UR NOT!! <3 is a edm festival DJ set by Skrillex, running 46 min. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 75/100 overall — solid.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 81/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 72/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 7 points, moving between 85 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a narrow dynamic range across the set.

    8 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 742.1 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 21 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%75
    Beat Alignmentmeasured81
    Transition Qualitymeasured58
    Phrase Accuracymeasured83
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured69
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured81
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%79
    Narrative ArcAI77
    ProgressionAI74
    Tension & ReleaseAI81
    Section AwarenessAI78
    Flow ContinuityAI76
    PayoffAI89

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%74
    Energy Curvemeasured73
    PacingAI74
    MomentumAI85
    Peak ManagementAI81
    Energy HandoffAI82
    Fatigue ControlAI37

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%72
    Unexpected MomentsAI78
    ContrastAI67
    Transition Varietymeasured87
    Selection RiskAI78
    FreshnessAI19
    Surprise ControlAI78

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%81
    Selection QualityAI81
    Identity ConsistencyAI88
    IntentionalityAI83
    ConfidenceAI87
    RestraintAI61
    SignatureAI85

    Energy arc

    23:0035:00

    Transitions analysed (8)

    2:12

    Hard cut on the downbeat with vocal echo

    Effective use of silence to reset the energy before the main drop.

    85
    5:28

    Short EQ blend

    The mid-range frequencies of both tracks fight for space for about 4 bars.

    68
    13:12

    EQ Clash / Level Jump

    strategic_disruption

    46
    15:45

    Vibe Shift

    64
    18:40

    Clean Blend

    82
    21:55

    Phase Drift / Muddy Layering

    subjective_error

    28
    24:15

    Perfect Drop Swap

    strategic_disruption

    100
    28:00

    Minor EQ Overlap

    82

    Technical subscores

    69

    EQ balance

    79

    Beat alignment

    78

    Energy control

    81

    Tempo stability

    71

    Loudness control

    74

    Musical coherence

    70

    Harmonic compatibility

    73

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    21 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    204 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    2,771

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    235

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    36

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    473

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (1×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (31:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 2:12Risky pressure or vibe dip
    • 5:28Risky pressure or vibe dip
    • 13:12Transition / momentum break
    • 15:45Risky pressure or vibe dip
    • 21:55Transition / momentum break
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Skrillex's F*CK U SKRILLEX YOU THINK UR ANDY WARHOL BUT UR NOT!! <3 get?
    F*CK U SKRILLEX YOU THINK UR ANDY WARHOL BUT UR NOT!! <3 scores 75/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (solid), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is F*CK U SKRILLEX YOU THINK UR ANDY WARHOL BUT UR NOT!! <3?
    The analysed recording runs 46 min.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 81/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 72/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    Similar edm festival sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Skrillex analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.