San Holo — San Holo - EDM Live Show from Atlanta (Full Set)

    Future Bass · 1h 25m · analysed 25 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    85/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    1h 25m
    Genre
    Future Bass

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, San Holo.

    In short

    San Holo - EDM Live Show from Atlanta (Full Set) by San Holo scores 85/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (94/100) and the weakest is TECHNIQUE (84/100).

    The DJ treats the set as a single emotional journey rather than a collection of tracks.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (1×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (51:30). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Experiment with longer, more atmospheric bridges to heighten emotional tension.
    • Incorporate more live improvisational elements during vocal breakdowns.
    • Utilize subtle polyrhythmic percussion layers to add complexity to the future bass grooves.
    • Experiment with more complex rhythmic layering during melodic breakdowns.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 0:45Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 0:45

      Perfectly timed drop that transitions the set from intro atmosphere to active groove.

    • 5:22Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 5:22

      Smooth integration of new vocal elements over the existing percussive bed.

    • 11:45Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 11:45

      Seamless energy transfer into the first major melodic peak.

    • 14:45Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 14:45

      Dramatic impact transition that resets the rhythmic pocket.

    • 24:08Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 24:08

      Intentional reset

    About this future bass set

    San Holo - EDM Live Show from Atlanta (Full Set) is a future bass DJ set by San Holo, running 1h 25m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 85/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    The DJ treats the set as a single emotional journey rather than a collection of tracks.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 94/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 84/100.

    The final score is capped by measured beatmatching: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 28 points, moving between 10 and 98 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    7 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 1088.6 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 27 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    On this set, the ceiling applied is measured beatmatching.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The DJ treats the set as a single emotional journey rather than a collection of tracks.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%84
    Beat Alignmentmeasured69
    Transition Qualitymeasured82
    Phrase Accuracymeasured94
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured83
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured95
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured80

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%92
    Narrative ArcAI94
    ProgressionAI90
    Tension & ReleaseAI93
    Section AwarenessAI93
    Flow ContinuityAI88
    PayoffAI96

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%89
    Energy Curvemeasured96
    PacingAI91
    MomentumAI94
    Peak ManagementAI93
    Energy HandoffAI90
    Fatigue ControlAI49

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%85
    Unexpected MomentsAI86
    ContrastAI89
    Transition Varietymeasured93
    Selection RiskAI91
    FreshnessAI49
    Surprise ControlAI86

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%94
    Selection QualityAI94
    Identity ConsistencyAI96
    IntentionalityAI96
    ConfidenceAI96
    RestraintAI85
    SignatureAI97

    Final score capped by measured beatmatching — the weighted average before the cap was 89.

    Energy arc

    0:0085:00

    Transitions analysed (7)

    0:45

    Cinematic impact transition with high-pass filter sweep

    Perfectly timed drop that transitions the set from intro atmosphere to active groove.

    92
    5:22

    Long melodic blend with vocal layering

    Smooth integration of new vocal elements over the existing percussive bed.

    88
    11:45

    High-pass filter sweep with impact FX

    Seamless energy transfer into the first major melodic peak.

    92
    14:45

    Hard cut on the downbeat after a 4-bar silence

    Dramatic impact transition that resets the rhythmic pocket.

    88
    21:45

    Perfect Blend

    100
    24:08

    Minor EQ Overlap

    intentional_reset

    82
    28:45

    Peak Impact Transition

    100

    Technical subscores

    83

    EQ balance

    92

    Beat alignment

    90

    Energy control

    95

    Tempo stability

    82

    Loudness control

    89

    Musical coherence

    92

    Harmonic compatibility

    86

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    27 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    216 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    5,094

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    40

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    0

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    383

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 99% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (1×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (51:30). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 1:45First Drop Impact
    • 6:15Vocal Sing-along Peak
    • 10:10Guitar Solo Introduction
    • 0:45Risky pressure or vibe dip
    • 12:15Euphoric Peak
    • 18:45Energy Reset
    • 14:45Risky pressure or vibe dip

    Coaching notes

    • Experiment with longer, more atmospheric bridges to heighten emotional tension.
    • Incorporate more live improvisational elements during vocal breakdowns.
    • Utilize subtle polyrhythmic percussion layers to add complexity to the future bass grooves.
    • Experiment with more complex rhythmic layering during melodic breakdowns.
    • Use longer atmospheric transitions to enhance the cinematic feel of the set.
    • Incorporate live instrumentation or vocal manipulation to further distinguish the pro signature.
    • Use longer filter sweeps to build anticipation during melodic transitions.
    • Incorporate more live-style instrumentation (e.g., guitar licks) to further distinguish the brand.
    • Experiment with tempo shifts to add a layer of rhythmic surprise.
    • Experiment with even longer atmospheric transitions to heighten the emotional tension.
    • Use a dedicated mid-side EQ to widen the pads while keeping the lead synths focused in the center.
    • Incorporate more live elements or vocal loops during the 'Great Reset' to bridge the silence.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does San Holo's San Holo - EDM Live Show from Atlanta (Full Set) get?
    San Holo - EDM Live Show from Atlanta (Full Set) scores 85/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is San Holo - EDM Live Show from Atlanta (Full Set)?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 25m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 94/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 84/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More San Holo sets analysed

    Similar future bass sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All San Holo analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Loading…