Robert Hood — Robert Hood at CUBOID - The Crave Festival 2026

    Detroit Techno · 1h 59m · analysed 19 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    79/100
    Level
    club ready
    Duration
    1h 59m
    Genre
    Detroit Techno

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Robert Hood.

    In short

    Robert Hood at CUBOID - The Crave Festival 2026 by Robert Hood scores 79/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (97/100) and the weakest is TECHNIQUE (81/100).

    True mastery is found in the ability to hold a crowd with nothing but a kick drum and a loop.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (15:00, 21:00, 28:00, 71:00, 95:00, 102:30). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Experiment with a single 'human' element (vocal snippet) to contrast the machine aesthetic.
    • Try a slightly longer breakdown at the 45-minute mark to reset the crowd's ears.
    • Ensure the high-end percussion doesn't become fatiguing over a 2-hour set.
    • Introduce a brief 'reset' moment (e.g., a 4-bar breakdown) to enhance the impact of the next peak.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 3:12Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 3:12

      Seamless transition where the new rhythmic element takes over the lead without a dip in energy.

    • 7:45Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 7:45

      A patient blend that allows the textures of both tracks to coexist, creating a new composite groove.

    • 13:10Measured (DSP)94/100Listen at 13:10

      Flawless execution of a bass handover, maintaining the drive.

    • 19:45Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 19:45

      Subtle introduction of metallic elements over 64 bars.

    • 26:15Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 26:15

      Perfectly executed handover of the sub-frequencies.

    About this detroit techno set

    Robert Hood at CUBOID - The Crave Festival 2026 is a detroit techno DJ set by Robert Hood, running 1h 59m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 79/100 overall — club ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    True mastery is found in the ability to hold a crowd with nothing but a kick drum and a loop.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 97/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 81/100.

    The final score is capped by measured beatmatching: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 32 points, moving between 75 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.

    5 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 1205.2 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 28 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    On this set, the ceiling applied is measured beatmatching.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    True mastery is found in the ability to hold a crowd with nothing but a kick drum and a loop.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%81
    Beat Alignmentmeasured67
    Transition Qualitymeasured62
    Phrase Accuracymeasured94
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured89
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured97
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%93
    Narrative ArcAI95
    ProgressionAI92
    Tension & ReleaseAI90
    Section AwarenessAI93
    Flow ContinuityAI97
    PayoffAI92

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%86
    Energy Curvemeasured84
    PacingAI95
    MomentumAI96
    Peak ManagementAI89
    Energy HandoffAI94
    Fatigue ControlAI36

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%84
    Unexpected MomentsAI86
    ContrastAI84
    Transition Varietymeasured96
    Selection RiskAI92
    FreshnessAI41
    Surprise ControlAI86

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%97
    Selection QualityAI95
    Identity ConsistencyAI99
    IntentionalityAI98
    ConfidenceAI98
    RestraintAI93
    SignatureAI97

    Final score capped by measured beatmatching — the weighted average before the cap was 88.

    Energy arc

    12:00119:00

    Transitions analysed (5)

    3:12

    Percussive swap with high-pass filtering

    Seamless transition where the new rhythmic element takes over the lead without a dip in energy.

    92
    7:45

    Long blend with mid-range EQ crossover

    A patient blend that allows the textures of both tracks to coexist, creating a new composite groove.

    88
    13:10

    Low-end swap on phrase

    Flawless execution of a bass handover, maintaining the drive.

    94
    19:45

    Long percussive blend

    Subtle introduction of metallic elements over 64 bars.

    88
    26:15

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Perfectly executed handover of the sub-frequencies.

    92

    Technical subscores

    89

    EQ balance

    94

    Beat alignment

    92

    Energy control

    97

    Tempo stability

    90

    Loudness control

    93

    Musical coherence

    83

    Harmonic compatibility

    89

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    28 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    221 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    7,128

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    122

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    0

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    185

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (15:00, 21:00, 28:00, 71:00, 95:00, 102:30). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 0:45Groove Lock Established
    • 10:15Rhythmic Peak
    • 16:20Groove Lock
    • 21:45Peak Tension
    • 29:45Rhythmic Peak

    Coaching notes

    • Experiment with a single 'human' element (vocal snippet) to contrast the machine aesthetic.
    • Try a slightly longer breakdown at the 45-minute mark to reset the crowd's ears.
    • Ensure the high-end percussion doesn't become fatiguing over a 2-hour set.
    • Introduce a brief 'reset' moment (e.g., a 4-bar breakdown) to enhance the impact of the next peak.
    • Experiment with more aggressive EQ cuts during transitions to create rhythmic 'gaps' that the crowd can fill.
    • Use a single, recognizable melodic element to provide a narrative anchor in the sea of rhythm.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Robert Hood's Robert Hood at CUBOID - The Crave Festival 2026 get?
    Robert Hood at CUBOID - The Crave Festival 2026 scores 79/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Robert Hood at CUBOID - The Crave Festival 2026?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 59m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 97/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 81/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Robert Hood sets analysed

    Similar detroit techno sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Robert Hood analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.