Pachanga Boys — Seelenheil-Set | Acid Pauli, Douglas Greed, Hame, Barnt, Gidge, Pachanga Boys, Alfred Heinrichs

    Indie House · 1h 45m · analysed 24 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    80/100
    Level
    club ready
    Duration
    1h 45m
    Genre
    Indie House

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Pachanga Boys.

    In short

    Seelenheil-Set | Acid Pauli, Douglas Greed, Hame, Barnt, Gidge, Pachanga Boys, Alfred Heinrichs by Pachanga Boys scores 80/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (90/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (81/100).

    You understand that in this genre, tension is built with chords, not just snare rolls.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 8:00, 12:00, 38:00, 45:30, 52:30). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Introduce a subtle melodic hook around the 42-minute mark to provide a point of focus amidst the rhythmic density.
    • Experiment with brief, intentional filter sweeps to create more pronounced release points in the hypnotic flow.
    • Maintain the current level of technical precision in transitions, as it is the foundation of the set's success.
    • Experiment with subtle field recordings to enhance the organic house elements.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 5:45Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 5:45

      Seamless transition between organic house tracks, maintaining the percussive groove.

    • 10:12Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 10:12

      Smooth introduction of melodic elements while filtering out the previous track's highs.

    • 14:45Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 14:45

      Very smooth transition, the incoming percussion sits perfectly in the mix.

    • 20:15Measured (DSP)78/100Listen at 20:15

      Effective use of filtering to clear space for the new lead element.

    About this indie house set

    Seelenheil-Set | Acid Pauli, Douglas Greed, Hame, Barnt, Gidge, Pachanga Boys, Alfred Heinrichs is a indie house DJ set by Pachanga Boys, running 1h 45m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 80/100 overall — club ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    You understand that in this genre, tension is built with chords, not just snare rolls.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 90/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 81/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 52 points, moving between 20 and 85 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    5 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 206.9 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 9 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    You understand that in this genre, tension is built with chords, not just snare rolls.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%87
    Beat Alignmentmeasured95
    Transition Qualitymeasured90
    Phrase Accuracymeasured90
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured85
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured92
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured59

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%86
    Narrative ArcAI91
    ProgressionAI85
    Tension & ReleaseAI82
    Section AwarenessAI88
    Flow ContinuityAI91
    PayoffAI77

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%85
    Energy Curvemeasured87
    PacingAI92
    MomentumAI86
    Peak ManagementAI84
    Energy HandoffAI84
    Fatigue ControlAI63

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%81
    Unexpected MomentsAI79
    ContrastAI84
    Transition Varietymeasured90
    Selection RiskAI81
    FreshnessAI59
    Surprise ControlAI79

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%90
    Selection QualityAI89
    Identity ConsistencyAI94
    IntentionalityAI90
    ConfidenceAI86
    RestraintAI92
    SignatureAI87

    Energy arc

    0:00105:00

    Transitions analysed (5)

    5:45

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Seamless transition between organic house tracks, maintaining the percussive groove.

    88
    10:12

    Filtered transition with melodic overlap

    Smooth introduction of melodic elements while filtering out the previous track's highs.

    82
    14:45

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Very smooth transition, the incoming percussion sits perfectly in the mix.

    85
    20:15

    Filter sweep and phrase-matched entry

    Effective use of filtering to clear space for the new lead element.

    78
    27:45

    Perfect Blend

    100

    Technical subscores

    85

    EQ balance

    91

    Beat alignment

    82

    Energy control

    92

    Tempo stability

    84

    Loudness control

    89

    Musical coherence

    91

    Harmonic compatibility

    87

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    9 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    83 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    6,283

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    16

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    91

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    297

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 8:00, 12:00, 38:00, 45:30, 52:30). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 0:00Atmospheric Intro
    • 7:45Groove Lock
    • 17:30Atmospheric Peak
    • 22:10Energy Plateau

    Coaching notes

    • Introduce a subtle melodic hook around the 42-minute mark to provide a point of focus amidst the rhythmic density.
    • Experiment with brief, intentional filter sweeps to create more pronounced release points in the hypnotic flow.
    • Maintain the current level of technical precision in transitions, as it is the foundation of the set's success.
    • Experiment with subtle field recordings to enhance the organic house elements.
    • Use a short, sharp filter cut to create a moment of tension before a major melodic entry.
    • Slightly increase the tempo by 0.5 BPM over 10 minutes to build subconscious energy.
    • Maintain this level of narrative circularity in future sets.
    • Experiment with subtle live filtering on the final vocal to add a unique performance touch.
    • Ensure the transition into the final ambient section is as harmonically precise as the earlier blends.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Pachanga Boys's Seelenheil-Set | Acid Pauli, Douglas Greed, Hame, Barnt, Gidge, Pachanga Boys, Alfred Heinrichs get?
    Seelenheil-Set | Acid Pauli, Douglas Greed, Hame, Barnt, Gidge, Pachanga Boys, Alfred Heinrichs scores 80/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Seelenheil-Set | Acid Pauli, Douglas Greed, Hame, Barnt, Gidge, Pachanga Boys, Alfred Heinrichs?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 45m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 90/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 81/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Pachanga Boys sets analysed

    Similar indie house sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Pachanga Boys analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.