Omri Smadar — Omri Smadar - @Gilapalooza [Dec 22]

    Melodic House · 1h 57m · analysed 24 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    81/100
    Level
    club ready
    Duration
    1h 57m
    Genre
    Melodic House

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Omri Smadar.

    In short

    Omri Smadar - @Gilapalooza [Dec 22] by Omri Smadar scores 81/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (87/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (78/100).

    The DJ's restraint is their greatest asset, creating a set that feels both powerful and effortless.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (29:00, 42:30, 58:00, 68:20, 76:00, 82:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Experiment with layering three tracks to create unique rhythmic textures.
    • Use subtle reverb washes to transition between different atmospheric moods.
    • Incorporate field recordings or organic samples to add a human touch to the digital precision.
    • Introduce melodic elements more gradually to avoid breaking the hypnotic flow.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 16:12Measured (DSP)90/100Listen at 16:12

      Expertly executed handover. The transition is felt through the change in percussion texture rather than a drop in energy.

    • 20:45Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 20:45

      Smooth integration of the incoming vocal track. The DJ waits for the phrase to resolve before fully committing the fader.

    • 23:45Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 23:45

      Very smooth transition, maintaining the percussive energy while introducing a new bassline motif.

    • 27:50Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 27:50

      Effective transition that shifts the focus from percussion to a more melodic synth texture.

    About this melodic house set

    Omri Smadar - @Gilapalooza [Dec 22] is a melodic house DJ set by Omri Smadar, running 1h 57m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 81/100 overall — club ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    The DJ's restraint is their greatest asset, creating a set that feels both powerful and effortless.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 87/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 78/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 46 points, moving between 65 and 90 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.

    6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 255.3 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 20 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The DJ's restraint is their greatest asset, creating a set that feels both powerful and effortless.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%86
    Beat Alignmentmeasured81
    Transition Qualitymeasured83
    Phrase Accuracymeasured90
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured87
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured92
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%85
    Narrative ArcAI88
    ProgressionAI84
    Tension & ReleaseAI81
    Section AwarenessAI85
    Flow ContinuityAI89
    PayoffAI82

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%82
    Energy Curvemeasured80
    PacingAI85
    MomentumAI89
    Peak ManagementAI82
    Energy HandoffAI84
    Fatigue ControlAI63

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%78
    Unexpected MomentsAI77
    ContrastAI78
    Transition Varietymeasured88
    Selection RiskAI77
    FreshnessAI61
    Surprise ControlAI77

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%87
    Selection QualityAI85
    Identity ConsistencyAI93
    IntentionalityAI87
    ConfidenceAI87
    RestraintAI87
    SignatureAI82

    Energy arc

    12:00104:00

    Transitions analysed (6)

    4:12

    Perfect Blend

    100
    8:50

    Invisible Handover

    100
    16:12

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Expertly executed handover. The transition is felt through the change in percussion texture rather than a drop in energy.

    90
    20:45

    Mid-range layering with vocal introduction

    Smooth integration of the incoming vocal track. The DJ waits for the phrase to resolve before fully committing the fader.

    85
    23:45

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Very smooth transition, maintaining the percussive energy while introducing a new bassline motif.

    88
    27:50

    Mid-frequency focused blend

    Effective transition that shifts the focus from percussion to a more melodic synth texture.

    82

    Technical subscores

    87

    EQ balance

    92

    Beat alignment

    85

    Energy control

    92

    Tempo stability

    86

    Loudness control

    89

    Musical coherence

    86

    Harmonic compatibility

    89

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    20 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    138 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    6,995

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    62

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    250

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    217

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (29:00, 42:30, 58:00, 68:20, 76:00, 82:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 14:30Groove Lock Established
    • 18:15Percussive Stagnation
    • 25:45Groove Lock

    Coaching notes

    • Experiment with layering three tracks to create unique rhythmic textures.
    • Use subtle reverb washes to transition between different atmospheric moods.
    • Incorporate field recordings or organic samples to add a human touch to the digital precision.
    • Introduce melodic elements more gradually to avoid breaking the hypnotic flow.
    • Experiment with brief moments of silence or extreme filtering to create more dramatic tension.
    • Add a unique signature element (e.g., a specific FX chain or vocal processing) to stand out.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Omri Smadar's Omri Smadar - @Gilapalooza [Dec 22] get?
    Omri Smadar - @Gilapalooza [Dec 22] scores 81/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Omri Smadar - @Gilapalooza [Dec 22]?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 57m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 87/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 78/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Omri Smadar sets analysed

    Similar melodic house sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Omri Smadar analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.