Omri Smadar — Festinoa 25 [DJ Set]

    Melodic House · 2h 00m · analysed 24 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    72/100
    Level
    solid
    Duration
    2h 00m
    Genre
    Melodic House

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Omri Smadar.

    In short

    Festinoa 25 [DJ Set] by Omri Smadar scores 72/100 in the SOONOS analysis (solid). The strongest dimension is TECHNIQUE (83/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (69/100).

    The DJ's technical proficiency is evident, but the next step is to infuse the set with a more personal and unique musical voice.

    Key takeaways

    What worked

    • Technical precision in transitions.
    • Consistent and engaging groove.
    • Effective energy management.

    What weakened the set

    • Recurring mid-frequency clash (2×) — Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 2× (09:15, 18:45).
    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (38:00, 46:00, 48:00, 58:00, 72:00, 76:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Incorporate more dynamic tension-release moments using breakdowns.
    • Experiment with melodic elements to add emotional depth to the dark groove.
    • Use creative FX (delays/reverbs) during transitions to smooth out vibe shifts.
    • Vary the transition lengths to keep the narrative unpredictable.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 04:30Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 04:30

      Smooth transition with excellent low-end management.

    • 09:15Measured (DSP)78/100Listen at 09:15

      Functional transition, slightly abrupt mid-range change but maintains groove.

    • 14:22Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 14:22

      Excellent execution of a standard tech-house blend. The incoming kick replaces the outgoing one perfectly on the 32nd bar.

    • 18:45Measured (DSP)78/100Listen at 18:45

      Slightly cluttered in the mid-range during the overlap, though the beatmatch remains locked.

    • 26:45Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 26:45

      Smooth transition with well-managed low frequencies.

    About this melodic house set

    Festinoa 25 [DJ Set] is a melodic house DJ set by Omri Smadar, running 2h 00m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 72/100 overall — solid.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    The DJ's technical proficiency is evident, but the next step is to infuse the set with a more personal and unique musical voice.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is TECHNIQUE at 83/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 69/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 58 points, moving between 60 and 89 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.

    5 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 955.3 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 18 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The DJ's technical proficiency is evident, but the next step is to infuse the set with a more personal and unique musical voice.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%83
    Beat Alignmentmeasured84
    Transition Qualitymeasured82
    Phrase Accuracymeasured84
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured83
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured88
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured75

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%77
    Narrative ArcAI79
    ProgressionAI76
    Tension & ReleaseAI71
    Section AwarenessAI77
    Flow ContinuityAI83
    PayoffAI78

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%73
    Energy Curvemeasured67
    PacingAI74
    MomentumAI85
    Peak ManagementAI75
    Energy HandoffAI79
    Fatigue ControlAI54

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%69
    Unexpected MomentsAI68
    ContrastAI67
    Transition Varietymeasured83
    Selection RiskAI66
    FreshnessAI50
    Surprise ControlAI68

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%77
    Selection QualityAI74
    Identity ConsistencyAI90
    IntentionalityAI76
    ConfidenceAI81
    RestraintAI67
    SignatureAI66

    Energy arc

    00:00120:00

    Transitions analysed (5)

    04:30

    Long EQ blend

    Smooth transition with excellent low-end management.

    88
    09:15

    EQ swap on phrase

    Functional transition, slightly abrupt mid-range change but maintains groove.

    78
    14:22

    Long EQ blend with bass swap

    Excellent execution of a standard tech-house blend. The incoming kick replaces the outgoing one perfectly on the 32nd bar.

    92
    18:45

    Mid-frequency blend

    Slightly cluttered in the mid-range during the overlap, though the beatmatch remains locked.

    78
    26:45

    EQ blend with low-end swap

    Smooth transition with well-managed low frequencies.

    85

    Technical subscores

    83

    EQ balance

    88

    Beat alignment

    81

    Energy control

    88

    Tempo stability

    82

    Loudness control

    80

    Musical coherence

    79

    Harmonic compatibility

    84

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    18 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    223 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    7,184

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    3

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    0

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    53

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Recurring mid-frequency clash

      Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 2× (09:15, 18:45).

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (38:00, 46:00, 48:00, 58:00, 72:00, 76:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What SOONOS heard

    • Technical precision in transitions.
    • Consistent and engaging groove.
    • Effective energy management.

    Timeline

    • 02:15Groove Lock
    • 08:30Energy Plateau
    • 16:30Groove Lock Plateau
    • 22:10Energy Stagnation
    • 18:45Risky pressure or vibe dip
    • 30:12Effective Breakdown

    Coaching notes

    • Incorporate more dynamic tension-release moments using breakdowns.
    • Experiment with melodic elements to add emotional depth to the dark groove.
    • Use creative FX (delays/reverbs) during transitions to smooth out vibe shifts.
    • Vary the transition lengths to keep the narrative unpredictable.
    • Sharpen EQ cuts during transitions to avoid frequency masking.
    • Shorten breakdowns to maintain dancefloor urgency.
    • Introduce more melodic or vocal elements to trigger crowd reactions.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Omri Smadar's Festinoa 25 [DJ Set] get?
    Festinoa 25 [DJ Set] scores 72/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (solid), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Festinoa 25 [DJ Set]?
    The analysed recording runs 2h 00m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    TECHNIQUE is the strongest category at 83/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 69/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Omri Smadar sets analysed

    Similar melodic house sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Omri Smadar analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.